mountains of titan (APOD 14 Dec 2006)
-
- Asternaut
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:22 am
mountains of titan (APOD 14 Dec 2006)
Am I the only one to notice that the caption to the dec 14 APOD mentions the tallest mountains yet observed- the near vertical ridge in picture- but that they failed to notice the huge massiff at the top of the picture? If the wee ridgelets are 1.5 Km high, how huge is the thing at the top of the photo?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061214.html
I didn't see it mentioned in the caption, Is there any idea what the "Black" area at the top of the image is??? I also noticed that the mountain ridges seem to be perfectly straight. Could this be from the radar imaging process?
I didn't see it mentioned in the caption, Is there any idea what the "Black" area at the top of the image is??? I also noticed that the mountain ridges seem to be perfectly straight. Could this be from the radar imaging process?
- JohnD
- Tea Time, Guv! Cheerio!
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:11 pm
- Location: Lancaster, England
Later:
BINGO!
Cassini-Huygens website: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cassini-Huy ... IVE_0.html
"The mountains probably formed when material welled up from below to fill the gaps opened when tectonic plates pull apart, similar to the way mid-ocean ridges are formed on Earth. "
Maybe just tectonics, maybe craterchain?
I gloat!
John
BINGO!
Cassini-Huygens website: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cassini-Huy ... IVE_0.html
"The mountains probably formed when material welled up from below to fill the gaps opened when tectonic plates pull apart, similar to the way mid-ocean ridges are formed on Earth. "
Maybe just tectonics, maybe craterchain?
I gloat!
John
- iamlucky13
- Commander
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA