"Flares" in Eris Photo (APOD 18 Sep 2006)
"Flares" in Eris Photo (APOD 18 Sep 2006)
Anybody have any knowledge regarding what appear to be some sort of prominent "flares" (for lack of a better term) at the 11 and 5 oclock positions in the photo of Eris, APOD, 9/18/06?
Its hard to tell for sure but its almost certainly to do with the Earths atmosphere. The bending of light by the atmosphere changes rapidly tending to smear the light out, you can see this in the wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/136199_Eris
Look at the video you can see how the stars in the field appear to change shape between frames. This can make objects look less round.
The "flares" are probably just light scattered from the main light source (Eris). They could also just be faint background stars that are also being scattered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/136199_Eris
Look at the video you can see how the stars in the field appear to change shape between frames. This can make objects look less round.
The "flares" are probably just light scattered from the main light source (Eris). They could also just be faint background stars that are also being scattered.
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
-
- Commander
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:20 pm
Scattered disk vs Kuiper belt; Eris vs Voyager (18 Sep 2006)
Some years ago, a Voyager space craft spent some time near Jupiter, then set out to leave the solar system. When it passed the orbit of Saturn and Pluto, I was happy to hear it had presumably left the solar system and entered the farther reaches of the universe. Now with the discovery of Eris as part of our solar system, has the time capsule on the Voyager spacecraft passed that orbit or is it still within our solar system? If it has not crossed that orbit, when is it expected to do so?
Hi LSTolo, welcome
I'm not sure if either Voyager has passed Eris, however the traditional definition of the edge of the solar system is the Heliopause, where the suns influence is equal to that of interstellar space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliopause
Both Voyagers are still several years away from crossing the the Heliopause, I don't think anyone is certain how long it will be until they cross it, but the current estimate is 2015.Hopefully they will have enough power to report back when they do. It will be a shame if they run out of power before they do.
I'm not sure if either Voyager has passed Eris, however the traditional definition of the edge of the solar system is the Heliopause, where the suns influence is equal to that of interstellar space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliopause
Both Voyagers are still several years away from crossing the the Heliopause, I don't think anyone is certain how long it will be until they cross it, but the current estimate is 2015.Hopefully they will have enough power to report back when they do. It will be a shame if they run out of power before they do.
- iamlucky13
- Commander
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
I don't think there's any question as to whether or not they'll have power to transmit. They're powered by nuclear RTG's that produce steady power for years (~25, I think), before slowly tapering off. The bigger question is will it be strong enough to hear, and even more importantly, will we still be paying people to listen? NASA has recently been seriously discussing concluding the Voyager mission completely due to the cost of the mission staff and scheduling communication times on the relatively small number of very busy radio antennae that are sensitive enough to pick up the signal.
I don't know if communication with the Voyagers is handled by the Deep Space Network antennae or some of the bigger ones, like the Arecibo or Parkes radio telescopes. The latter are only designed to listen, not transmit, and I assume instructions are still needed to tell them when to send back data.
I sure hope we're still listening to them when they reach that point, but I don't know how much value they really offer. It could be that the instruments onboard aren't specific enough (they were designed to survey the solar system, not test the waters of interstellar space) to accomplish anything more than confirm the most obvious bits and pieces of our theories about what's around us.
Still useful: Yes
Worth the cost: I hope so. Just being able to confirm where the heliopause is exactly might tell us a remarkable amount about interstellar space.
I don't know if communication with the Voyagers is handled by the Deep Space Network antennae or some of the bigger ones, like the Arecibo or Parkes radio telescopes. The latter are only designed to listen, not transmit, and I assume instructions are still needed to tell them when to send back data.
I sure hope we're still listening to them when they reach that point, but I don't know how much value they really offer. It could be that the instruments onboard aren't specific enough (they were designed to survey the solar system, not test the waters of interstellar space) to accomplish anything more than confirm the most obvious bits and pieces of our theories about what's around us.
Still useful: Yes
Worth the cost: I hope so. Just being able to confirm where the heliopause is exactly might tell us a remarkable amount about interstellar space.
"Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man." ~J. Robert Oppenheimer (speaking about Albert Einstein)
Per our friend, the Wikipedia:
Wikipedia wrote:As of September 5, 2006, Voyager 2 is at a distance of around 80.5 AU (approximately 12 terameters) from the Sun, deep in the scattered disc. It is more than twice the distance from the Sun as Pluto, and far beyond the perihelion of 90377 Sedna, but not yet beyond the outer limits of the orbit of Eris.
Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
scattered disk vs. kuiper belt (APOD 18 Sep 2006)
Greetings,
I am a big fan of astronomy picture of the day, but have no other 'training' in astronomy other than what I learn from the website and its links. The picture on 9/19 induced me to follow all the links to Wikepedia, starting with dwarf planets. Wikepedia lists Eris as orbiting in the scattered disc (which it further describes: 'The innermost portion of the scattered disc overlaps with the Kuiper belt, but its outer limits extend much farther away from the Sun and above and below the ecliptic than the belt'). The astronomy picture of the day lists Eris as orbiting in the Kuiper belt.
Is this a semantics thing? Just curious....
Also, what about the multiple shadows of the moon (?) on today's picture - an effect of the lens?
MNMary
I am a big fan of astronomy picture of the day, but have no other 'training' in astronomy other than what I learn from the website and its links. The picture on 9/19 induced me to follow all the links to Wikepedia, starting with dwarf planets. Wikepedia lists Eris as orbiting in the scattered disc (which it further describes: 'The innermost portion of the scattered disc overlaps with the Kuiper belt, but its outer limits extend much farther away from the Sun and above and below the ecliptic than the belt'). The astronomy picture of the day lists Eris as orbiting in the Kuiper belt.
Is this a semantics thing? Just curious....
Also, what about the multiple shadows of the moon (?) on today's picture - an effect of the lens?
MNMary
Latest APOD photo of Eris
Just a thought on the APOD keck Observatory photo of Eris on September 18:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060918.html
Has anyone considered that the two "spikes" of light from the planet, (not the moon) may be rings?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060918.html
Has anyone considered that the two "spikes" of light from the planet, (not the moon) may be rings?
-
- Commander
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:57 pm
- Location: On a boat near Tacoma, WA, usa
- Contact:
anything is possible
In this image from Cassini http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08323 it would almost appear like the Earth has a ring in the plane of the moon (which is the small bulge in the image at the 10:30 position) The proposed ring would be the slight flare at the 4:30 position, opposite the moon.
In this image from Cassini http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08323 it would almost appear like the Earth has a ring in the plane of the moon (which is the small bulge in the image at the 10:30 position) The proposed ring would be the slight flare at the 4:30 position, opposite the moon.
-
- Asternaut
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
A General Question
this is going to sound dumb to people who know the answer, but I've been wondering for a while now...
Why is is that we can get crystal-clear images of galaxies millions of light-years away and nebulae hundreds of light years away, but all the images of something a couple hundred million miles away come back looking like sonogram pictures? Someone please enlighten me!!
Why is is that we can get crystal-clear images of galaxies millions of light-years away and nebulae hundreds of light years away, but all the images of something a couple hundred million miles away come back looking like sonogram pictures? Someone please enlighten me!!
What ever happened to standards? What happened to bare minimums? - Huey, "The Boondocks"
Re: A General Question
See this threadNeoEspiritus wrote:Why is is that we can get crystal-clear images of galaxies millions of light-years away and nebulae hundreds of light years away, but all the images of something a couple hundred million miles away come back looking like sonogram pictures? Someone please enlighten me!!
-
- Asternaut
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Thanks
Thanks
What ever happened to standards? What happened to bare minimums? - Huey, "The Boondocks"