Page 1 of 1
Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 7:35 pm
by Jim Leff
Very brief and entertaining video clip
It takes a couple viewings to see exactly what's going on here: the ball flew straight into the pitcher's glove (and he then had to manage his body’s reaction).
I'm curious about the odds of a ball reaching a 11cm x 11cm target from a distance of 18m. Maybe assume, for simplicity, that it's equally likely to be hit anywhere within a 90° horizontal angle (let's discount foul balls), and at any vertical angle of 0 - 45°. Pitcher's mound is about 18m from home plate.
Can anyone help?
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:09 pm
by neufer
Jim Leff wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 7:35 pm
Very brief and entertaining video clip
It takes a couple viewings to see exactly what's going on here: the ball flew straight into the pitcher's glove (and he then had to manage his body’s reaction).
I'm curious about the odds of a ball reaching a 11cm x 11cm target from a distance of 18m. Maybe assume, for simplicity, that it's equally likely to be hit anywhere within a 90° horizontal angle (let's discount foul balls), and at any vertical angle of 0 - 45°. Pitcher's mound is about 18m from home plate.
Can anyone help?
To first order (for a ball traveling that fast) it must be something like 2 in (1800 cm/11 cm)
2.
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:25 pm
by Jim Leff
Thanks! 163.6 squared is 26765. So the odds are something like 2 in 26765, or 1 in 13382?
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 9:51 pm
by bystander
Did he throw out the guy on second? He didn't tag up.
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:06 pm
by Jim Leff
Good point. Not sure.
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 2:19 pm
by neufer
Jim Leff wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 8:25 pm
Thanks! 163.6 squared is 26765. So the odds are something like 2 in 26765, or 1 in 13382?
It is
an absolute fact that the probability of
- 1) hitting a 22 cm x 22 cm square in the vicinity of the pitcher is 4 times the
probability of hitting a 11 cm x 11 cm square in the vicinity of the pitcher
and that the probability of
2) hitting a 33 cm x 33 cm square in the vicinity of the pitcher is 9 times the
probability of hitting a 11 cm x 11 cm square in the vicinity of the pitcher
The only question is at what point within a 18 meter radius shell surrounding the batter
does the probability of hitting
any given 11 cm x 11 cm square drop off from that of
the stated perfect back-scatter 11 cm x 11 cm square situation.
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 4:26 pm
by Jim Leff
If I understand your question correctly, it was addressed when I suggested we assume, for simplicity, that it's equally likely to be hit anywhere within a 90° horizontal angle and at any vertical angle of 0 - 45°.
However I’m still not sure if I’ve translated your previous reply into the correct “1 in xx” statement of odds.
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 5:20 pm
by neufer
Jim Leff wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2019 4:26 pm
If I understand your question correctly, it was addressed when I suggested we assume, for simplicity, that it's equally likely to be hit anywhere within a 90° horizontal angle and at any vertical angle of 0 - 45°.
However I’m still not sure if I’ve translated your previous reply into the correct “1 in xx” statement of odds.
I was actually just trying to explain my logic in response
to your immediate reply (which you have since deleted).
If, in fact,
"
it's equally likely to be hit anywhere within
a 90° horizontal angle and at any vertical angle of 0 - 45°" =
1.11 steradians
as compared to the target area of (11 cm/1800 cm)
2 steradians,
then the answer (
for a very fast ball) is ~1 in 29,750.
One should consider pop up flies & ground balls as other non-foul playable hits
but ~1 in 29,750 is probably in the right ballpark.
Re: Geometry of a Fluke
Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 7:23 pm
by Jim Leff
I haven’t deleted anything.
Thanks.