Starship Asterisk*

Bright Spiral Galaxy M81

Explanation: One of the brightest galaxies in planet Earth's sky is similar in size to our Milky Way Galaxy: big, beautiful M81. This grand spiral galaxy can be found toward the northern constellation of the Great Bear (Ursa Major). This superbly detailed view reveals M81's bright yellow nucleus, blue spiral arms, and sweeping cosmic dust lanes with a scale comparable to the Milky Way. Hinting at a disorderly past, a remarkable dust lane actually runs straight through the disk, to the left of the galactic center, contrary to M81's other prominent spiral features. The errant dust lane may be the lingering result of a close encounter between M81 and its smaller companion galaxy, M82. Scrutiny of variable stars in M81 has yielded one of the best determined distances for an external galaxy -- 11.8 million light-years.

<< Previous APOD

This Day in APOD

Next APOD >>

[/b]

This is a very beautiful picture of one of the most-photographed objects in the sky. I love the details and the vibrant RGB + Ha colors.

The caption says that the dust lane seen across the bulge of M81 is an innate part of M81. I thought it was believed to be a dusty streamer of cirrus in the Milky Way, seen across the face of M81.

I can see that the stellar spikes look quite different, and I wonder what starsurfer is going to say.

Ann

Are we looking at the Galaxy from the top or from the bottom? It is turning clockwise in any case.

Ann wrote:I can see that the stellar spikes look quite different, and I wonder what starsurfer is going to say.

Ann

Well, I'll say that the differing numbers of spikes (the brightest have eight, then the less bright have four, but most stars have none) is a giveaway that this is an added effect. Personally, I feel that it detracts from an otherwise excellent image.

Bruce

Edit: Spike count correction.

Unless he's using some data other than Subaru, HST, and Gendler's and hasn't told us, then yeah, those are all generated. He likes to do that. The mirroring of the image and the use of eight spikes do baffle me.

Renato wrote:Are we looking at the Galaxy from the top or from the bottom? It is turning clockwise in any case.

What do you mean by “top” or “bottom”?

Has any one ever wonder about this fellow having two nucleus??? If you look closely (or perhaps not so closely) one can see two bright nucleus: one stronger (at the right) than the other.

sunlight wrote:Has any one ever wonder about this fellow having two nucleus??? If you look closely (or perhaps not so closely) one can see two bright nucleus: one stronger (at the right) than the other.

I think this is some sort of imaging artifact. M81 probably doesn't have a double nucleus. M31 is the only example I know of for a double nucleus spiral galaxy.

My guess would be dust lanes breaking up our view of the core.

Wasn't the vertical dust lane actually IFN (Integrated Flux Nebula) in our own galaxy, superimposed by chance over M81?

D.

dsecrieru wrote:Wasn't the vertical dust lane actually IFN (Integrated Flux Nebula) in our own galaxy, superimposed by chance over M81?

The IFN is extremely tenuous, only visible by reflected light in very deep images. It's nowhere near dense enough to significantly attenuate any bright objects behind it, including the core of M81.

Chris Peterson wrote:

sunlight wrote:Has any one ever wonder about this fellow having two nucleus??? If you look closely (or perhaps not so closely) one can see two bright nucleus: one stronger (at the right) than the other.

I think this is some sort of imaging artifact. M81 probably doesn't have a double nucleus. M31 is the only example I know of for a double nucleus spiral galaxy.

My guess would be dust lanes breaking up our view of the core.

Here's a near-infrared picture of it from HST. It comes to a fine point and even saturates the sensor slightly. There are two slightly brighter lobes encircling the nucleus but definitely only one nucleus.

From the view we have of M81, does it look to anyone else as if the upper right section is higher than the nucleus and is being swept up and away to the left?

stardog wrote:From the view we have of M81, does it look to anyone else as if the upper right section is higher than the nucleus and is being swept up and away to the left?

Misalignment of two different data sets of the same section of the galaxy. Not real. (Assuming you are talking about the same thing I see. Maybe you mean something else.)

Edit: I think you are talking about something else. You mean it looks like the upper arm is inclined from the plane of the galaxy?

Awesome image....lots of star forming zones.

:---[===] *

stardog wrote:From the view we have of M81, does it look to anyone else as if the upper right section is higher than the nucleus and is being swept up and away to the left?

Given the absence of any real depth perception data in that regard, I'm going to assume that anything my brain computes is spurious.

Ann wrote: I can see that the stellar spikes look quite different, and I wonder what starsurfer is going to say.

While the diffraction spikes are fake, what bothers me most about this image is that it is mirror reversed. However it is a fairly pleasant version of one of all time favourite spiral galaxies and I consider this slightly better than the official HST image.

Hi,
yes, there are misalignments in some areas.
Unfortunately, at the time I did the assembling, I was not yet a Registar user so I assembled hundreds of sub-frames manually in PS (Subaru, HST and Gendler [RGB]) along 4/5 months.

For what concerns the spikes, Subaru stars were pretty compromised by blooming so, no choice, I had to mask them with fake ones.

Bests.

rcolombari wrote:For what concerns the spikes, Subaru stars were pretty compromised by blooming so, no choice, I had to mask them with fake ones.

Ah, so there can be good reasons for spiking up an astro-image. That's good to know. Thanks for your excellent work.

Bruce

Chris Peterson wrote:M31 is the only example I know of for a double nucleus spiral galaxy.

Reading this I decided to be on the look out for more double nuclei in spirals. So far the only one is M83 but it's no secret. Maybe they aren't so rare but they may be so close together that it's difficult to find them? M83's was obscured by thick dust too.

geckzilla wrote:

Chris Peterson wrote:M31 is the only example I know of for a double nucleus spiral galaxy.

Reading this I decided to be on the look out for more double nuclei in spirals. So far the only one is M83 but it's no secret. Maybe they aren't so rare but they may be so close together that it's difficult to find them? M83's was obscured by thick dust too.

Whatcha about M31?

geckzilla wrote:

Chris Peterson wrote:M31 is the only example I know of for a double nucleus spiral galaxy.

Reading this I decided to be on the look out for more double nuclei in spirals. So far the only one is M83 but it's no secret. Maybe they aren't so rare but they may be so close together that it's difficult to find them? M83's was obscured by thick dust too.

AFAIK M31 is the only spiral galaxy known to have a double nucleus, and the only one where such a nucleus is visible in ordinary white light images. There is evidence that M83 has something odd going on around its central black hole that is creating a double nucleus, but that isn't certain, and is nowhere near as prominent as what we see in M31.

In part, it depends on what we mean by "double nucleus". At a fine enough scale, you could argue that every galaxy has multiple nucleuses.