What was the absolute magnitude of Eta Carinae in 1843?
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:52 pm
In 1843, Eta Carinae became the second brightest star in the sky, with an apparent magnitude of -0.8, despite being several thousand light-years away.
How bright was Eta Carinae intrinsically? To answer the question, we need to make several assumptions. Let's assume that Eta Carinae was located 8,000 light-years from the Earth. Let's assume that the light that reached the Earth from the star was completely unaffected by reddening (which is impossible, but never mind). Let's not worry about the bolometric (total) luminosity of the star in 1843, which is probably hard to estimate, since there were presumably no measurements done of the brightness of the star in different wavelengths back in 1843. Let's just assume that a magnitude of -0.8 corresponded to the "visual" magnitude of the star, whatever we mean by that.
If we make all these assumptions, how bright was Eta Carinae intrinsically (and visually) back in 1843? Let's compare it with the Sun, whose absolute magnitude in V (visual) light is +4.84.
Ann
How bright was Eta Carinae intrinsically? To answer the question, we need to make several assumptions. Let's assume that Eta Carinae was located 8,000 light-years from the Earth. Let's assume that the light that reached the Earth from the star was completely unaffected by reddening (which is impossible, but never mind). Let's not worry about the bolometric (total) luminosity of the star in 1843, which is probably hard to estimate, since there were presumably no measurements done of the brightness of the star in different wavelengths back in 1843. Let's just assume that a magnitude of -0.8 corresponded to the "visual" magnitude of the star, whatever we mean by that.
If we make all these assumptions, how bright was Eta Carinae intrinsically (and visually) back in 1843? Let's compare it with the Sun, whose absolute magnitude in V (visual) light is +4.84.
Ann