Question on Time and Telescopes.
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:02 am
This no doubt rates as a newby's first (and probably not last) stupid question, but the answer is out there, so break it to me gently, pleeeaase.
Having learned more of Astronomy from Assimov and ilk than from anything approaching education, and being borderline numerically dyslectic, I have only a 'visual' form of knowledge and interest in the field. Pure amateur. I've now retired and have more time to think about all that I don't know about it yet. This question has vexed me for some time and I just know there's a simple answer, but I can't find it.
I understand that when we look at a distant object we see it as it was, not as it is now, due to the speed of light.
I get that looking at distant objects is tantamount to looking into the past.
What bothers me is the newer discoveries, and statements, that we can 'see' the 'Big Bang' formation of the Universe.
Given that, to my understanding, light speed is the upper limit of anything getting anywhere, and that presumably the Universe couldn't expand faster than that, how did we get here before the light from the Big Bang?? Wouldn't that initial light emission be well past this point by now???
Is the whole reported discovery being warped by journalese and what we are really seeing is just the residual 'glow'? Or am I hopelessly clueless, and will I, as my username suggests, die wondering?
Having learned more of Astronomy from Assimov and ilk than from anything approaching education, and being borderline numerically dyslectic, I have only a 'visual' form of knowledge and interest in the field. Pure amateur. I've now retired and have more time to think about all that I don't know about it yet. This question has vexed me for some time and I just know there's a simple answer, but I can't find it.
I understand that when we look at a distant object we see it as it was, not as it is now, due to the speed of light.
I get that looking at distant objects is tantamount to looking into the past.
What bothers me is the newer discoveries, and statements, that we can 'see' the 'Big Bang' formation of the Universe.
Given that, to my understanding, light speed is the upper limit of anything getting anywhere, and that presumably the Universe couldn't expand faster than that, how did we get here before the light from the Big Bang?? Wouldn't that initial light emission be well past this point by now???
Is the whole reported discovery being warped by journalese and what we are really seeing is just the residual 'glow'? Or am I hopelessly clueless, and will I, as my username suggests, die wondering?