Page 1 of 1

SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:39 pm
by bystander
Celebrities and Science 2010
Sense about Science | 29 Dec 2010
Each year at Sense About Science we review the odd science claims people in the public eye have made – about diets, cancer, magnets, radiation and more – sent in to us by scientists and members of the public. Many of these claims promote theories, therapies and campaigns that make no scientific sense. We ask scientists to respond, to help the celebrities realise where they are going wrong and to help the public to make sense of celebrity claims.

WHAT’S NEW IN THE 2010 REVIEW?

This year, we have seen the biggest rise in dubious theories about how the body works, so we have included singer and actress Olivia Newton-John, who said that she takes digestive enzymes and plant tonics to boost her immune system. Other unusual ideas about boosting our bodily functions have prompted strange diets, from Naomi Campbell’s maple syrup, lemon and pepper regime to Girls Aloud’s Sarah Harding sprinkling charcoal over her meals.

In sport and fitness, cage fighter Alex Reid shared tips about preparing for a fight (he ‘reabsorbs’ his sperm). David Beckham and Kate Middleton have been spotted wearing a hologram-embedded silicone bracelet which claims to improve energy and fitness. And Cheryl Cole reputedly extolled a weight loss regime based on her blood group.

In health and disease, celebrity views about the causes of cancer retained the improvement seen in 2009, though actress Joanna Lumley and former Harrods owner Mohamed Fayed both get a mention.

And although we have noted far fewer claims about the benefits of ‘chemical free’ food this year, model Gisele Bündchen raised some old misconceptions as she joined the ‘breast is best’ baby feeding debate.

As always, the review notes people in the public eye who do make scientific sense. Reports of Jennifer Aniston’s ‘baby food diet’ caused some raised eyebrows, so dietitians were glad to see her deny rumours that she follows the puréed food regime. Jennifer said: “Sorry, but the last time I had baby food, I believe I was one. I’ve been on solids for about forty years now.”

To improve the outlook for 2011, we have distilled our scientists’ responses into easy-to-remember pointers for celebrity commentators.
  • Detox is a marketing myth: ƒƒour body does it without pricey potions and detox diets.
  • There’s no need to boost: ƒƒbodily functions occur without ‘boosting’.
  • Energy and fitness come from food and ƒƒexercise: there are no shortcuts.
  • Nothing is chemical free: ƒƒeverything is made of chemicals, it’s just a case of which ones.

Re: SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:15 pm
by geckzilla
Good luck with the delusional health masses. Chances are those of us already intelligent to know better already do know better and the rest can't seem to understand the sound arguments against all the nonsense they believe in. The detox and chemical thing especially... Water is a chemical? Who knew!? For some reason you say chemical and people imagine that you're preparing your food with pesticides and Windex.

Re: SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:47 pm
by bystander
geckzilla wrote:... Water is a chemical? Who knew!? ...
:lol: Dihydrogen Monoxide :roll:

Re: SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:49 pm
by Beyond
All i could get out of bystanders link for >Dihydrogen Monoxide< is that it is some kind of acid.
Water is (2)-parts Hydrogen and (1)-part Oxygen. If you throw water on a regular fire - It goes out. If you throw it on a really hot fire(i forget the tempreture required)that breaks down the molecular bonds, then you're feeding the fire with oxygen and hydrogen and get about a 5000 degree flame. This was discovered by Arsonists for hire many years ago. At "normal" tempretures, water also tastes good. Versatile stuff, water. Gulp-gulp -- Ahhhh.

Re: SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:19 am
by bystander
beyond wrote:All i could get out of bystanders link for >Dihydrogen Monoxide< is that it is some kind of acid.
Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka Hydronium Hydroxide or Hydric Acid) is H2O.

Re: SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:21 am
by geckzilla
Oh dear, DHMO.org claims another victim. :lol:

Re: SAS: Celebrities and Science 2010

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:40 am
by Beyond
bystander wrote:
beyond wrote:All i could get out of bystanders link for >Dihydrogen Monoxide< is that it is some kind of acid.
Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka Hydronium Hydroxide or Hydric Acid) is H2O.
Well, it must be the weakest acid around or we'd all be in BIG trouble :!: