Page 1 of 1

APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:01 am
by APOD Robot
Image Young Suns of NGC 7129

Explanation: Young suns still lie within dusty NGC 7129, some 3,000 light-years away toward the royal constellation Cepheus. While these stars are at a relatively tender age, only a few million years old, it is likely that our own Sun formed in a similar stellar nursery some five billion years ago. Most noticeable in the sharp, (zoomable) image are the lovely bluish dust clouds that reflect the youthful starlight, but the smaller, deep red crescent shapes are also markers of energetic, young stellar objects. Known as Herbig-Haro objects, their shape and color is characteristic of glowing hydrogen gas shocked by jets streaming away from newborn stars. Ultimately the natal gas and dust in the region will be dispersed, the stars drifting apart as the loose cluster orbits the center of the Galaxy. At the estimated distance of NGC 7129, this telescopic view spans about 40 light-years.

<< Previous APODDiscuss Any APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:57 am
by Ann
This is a fascinating and delightful image of a low-mass star forming region. The fact that the region is "low-mass" means that the most massive of the stars that form here are no more than, say, two or three times more massive than the Sun.

When you look at todays APOD, start by noticing the dull, dark "mist" that seems to permeate much of the field of view. (But this mist isn't all over the image, not where the background sky seems black and full of stars.) The "mist" is a mixture of gas, which is invisible, and dust, which is not. (The "dust" generally consists of tiny particles of carbon and silicon, coated with ice.)

Where the "mist" looks dark brownish gray but relatively transparent, the concentration of gas and dust is higher than average in the Milky Way, but not high enough to start forming stars.

But now you should be able to find what looks like patches and "tentacles" that are pitch black and opaque. Here the gas and dust that we have already detected in the area has started to collapse under its own weight, due to self-gravitation. The black color is due to the concentration of the dust. When patches of highly condentrated gas and dustg become opaque and pitch black the temperature inside them drops. This allows the gas inside to fall towards the center of the cloud at a faster pace. You get a "core" of concentrated gas (and dust). In fact, you get... a proto-sun.

But not everywhere. The fact that there are large black patches of concentrated gas and dust in this picture doesn't mean that there are stars forming everywhere inside this blackness.

This is an infrared image of the NGC 7129 region, taken by the Spitzer Space Telescope:
Click to view full size image
You should be able to recognize the general shape of the NGC 7129 nebula. I'm not extremely good at reading infrared images myself, but please not the largish green area which corresponds to an area of utter blackness in the image that we see in visible light. That means that something is going on inside this dark cloud that is hidden from view in visible light.

Let's return to today's APOD, which shows NGC 7129 is visible light.

There are four newborn stars in the visible ligth image that seems to be of particular interest. One is an orange source of light in the upper right part of the large blue reflection nebula. The orange source is surrounded by some visible orange turbulence, which bears some resemblance to a "hurricane". Clearly this must be a young star which is emerging from the deep dark blackness where it formed, but it is still in a turbulent stage and not fully formed. Another thing which is obvious is that this star is relatively faint. It is a low-mass star, probably more light-weight than the Sun. You can find it in the Spitzer image as a relatively faint slightly yellowish star.

Below this star, if you look at the visible light image, is another light source which is much more deeply orange. This is another star which is in the process of emerging from its dust cocoon, but this star may be slightly more massive than the one above it. In the Spitzer image this very orange source looks quite blue, indicating a more energetic source.

But two other stars are also emerging from their dust cocoons, and they are much more energetic and much brighter than the two orange ones. In the visible image, both these bright stars look white-to-peach. In the Spitzer image, the source on the right is bluer than the one to the left. In the visible-light image, a meandering hydrogen emission pink jet is emerging from this star. The jet forms the shape of an arc as it passes another embedded bright star, a star which looks bright blue in the visible image. Clearly the stellar wind from this blue star pushes the jet to one side. It is also likely that magnetic forces in the nebula helps shape the jet. The bright red crescents at the top of the image may be the ends and the "bow shocks" of this jet, as it slams into gas at the end of what may be a magnetized bubble around the nebula.

In any case, the stars with the visible pink jet emerging from it should be the highest-mass star here, or at least it should be of higher mass than the other stars which have not yet peeked out of their dusty cocoons.

Ann

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:24 pm
by orin stepanek
Wouldn't it be nice to actually see them burst into view? 8-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8tULZHI ... re=related

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:21 pm
by neufer
Ann wrote:
You should be able to recognize the general shape of the NGC 7129 nebula.
It's a cute little baby animal :!: Gitchy gitchy goo.
Ann wrote:
I'm not extremely good at reading infrared images myself, but please not the largish green area which corresponds to an area of utter blackness in the image that we see in visible light.
A large green snot booger?

Remove that dust bunny to the 2175-angst room.

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:57 pm
by Ann
orin stepanek wrote:Wouldn't it be nice to actually see them burst into view? 8-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8tULZHI ... re=related
Nice video, Orin! Although I have to wonder how those processes could ever create any stars, since the proto-stars seem to shatter all the time!

Ann

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:53 pm
by Boswell
Would it be possible to track the path of our solar system back to its beginnings to determine its Galactic birth location. Was our solar system closer to the Galactic center? Was our sun born in a similar cluster. If we knew our galactic birthplace would this answer question about where all the gold and heavier
elements come from and how we ended up between the galactic arms. Best of all is our sun traveling out of the galaxy or is it being pulled inward toward
the center. If this were possible than we could try and find our sun's sister systems which might have similar planets like earth.

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:01 pm
by orin stepanek
Ann wrote:
orin stepanek wrote:Wouldn't it be nice to actually see them burst into view? 8-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8tULZHI ... re=related
Nice video, Orin! Although I have to wonder how those processes could ever create any stars, since the proto-stars seem to shatter all the time!

Ann
I searched the net for quite a while looking for a good simulation. There may be something better; but I never found it.

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:22 pm
by neufer
Boswell wrote:
Would it be possible to track the path of our solar system back to its beginnings to determine its Galactic birth location. Was our solar system closer to the Galactic center? Was our sun born in a similar cluster. If we knew our galactic birthplace would this answer question about where all the gold and heavier elements come from and how we ended up between the galactic arms. Best of all is our sun traveling out of the galaxy or is it being pulled inward toward the center. If this were possible than we could try and find our sun's sister systems which might have similar planets like earth.
http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=Gaia&page=picture_of_the_week wrote:
ESA Picture of the Week: The quest for the Sun's siblings.
An explanatory search in the Hipparcos Catalogue

<<Following the predictions by Portegies Zwart on the possible whereabouts of the lost siblings of the Sun (i.e. stars born in the same cluster as the Sun, see PoW published on 21/04/2009), a search for potential siblings was conducted in the Hipparcos Catalogue (using the new reduction, see PoW published on 24/02/2009). This search is based on the predicted phase space distribution of the Sun's siblings from simple simulations of the orbits of the cluster stars in a smooth Galactic potential. For stars within 100 pc the simulations show that it is interesting to examine those that have small space motions relative to the Sun. From amongst the candidate siblings thus selected there are six stars with ages consistent with that of the Sun. Considering their radial velocities and abundances only one potential candidate, HIP 21158, remains but essentially the result of the search is negative. This is consistent with predictions on the number of siblings near the Sun. The research was carried out by Anthony Brown, Simon Portegies Zwart (both Leiden Observatory) and Jennifer Bean (Missouri State University) and is published in MNRAS in September 2010. Brown and Portegies Zwart will continue the theoretical work of understanding how star clusters dissolve in a realistic Galactic potential in order to better prepare future searches for the Sun's siblings in the Gaia catalogue.>> The contours show the distribution in this diagram of the stars in the Hipparcos Catalogue with σϖ/ϖ≤0.1 and σ(B-V)≤0.05. The contours show the numbers of stars in bins of 0.05×0.2 mag2, where the contour levels are at 5, 20, 50 and 500 stars/bin. The triangles are the candidate siblings selected to be nearby and have small proper motions, and the large dots are the siblings selected from the Geneva-Copenhagen Survey catalogue with ages consistent with that of the Sun (4.6 Gyr). The solid line shows the isochrone at the age and metallicity of the Sun according to the Padova models, the dashed line shows the same isochrone for the Yonsei-Yale models, and the dot-dashed line for the BaSTI models.
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/41021177.html wrote:
Sky & Telescope: The Lost Siblings of the Sun
Most stars are born in clusters rather than singly, and there’s plenty of evidence that the Sun was too.
NEWS BLOG by Alan MacRobert
Image
This Hubble closeup of part of the Trifid Nebula in Sagittarius shows the kind of environment where the Sun and solar system were probably born. Massive hot stars dominate the scene; they will run through their brief lives quickly and explode as supernovae. The larger white box shows several more modest stars that recently formed in the retreating gas-and-dust pillar to their right. The small box highlights a "proplyd," a protoplanetary disk around a star that may end up like our Sun.

For one thing, the material of the infant solar system (as preserved in the earliest meteorites) was enriched by fresh supernova debris from at least one very young, massive star (having 15 to 25 solar masses) that exploded less than 5 light-years away, no more than 2 million years after the Sun's formation. Today no such massive star exists within 300 light-years of the Sun. Clearly, the early solar system had stars close around it.

But that was 4.57 billion years ago. Where are the Sun’s cluster-mates now?

Some of them, it turns out, should remain surprisingly nearby. An analysis by Simon F. Portegies Zwart (University of Amsterdam) finds that the Sun’s birth cluster started off with about 500 to 3,000 solar masses and a diameter smaller than about 20 light-years — typical for open clusters. Evidence for the cluster's mass and size, Zwart writes, is preserved in the anomalous chemical abundances and structure of the solar system's Kuiper Belt — the realm of small, icy objects out beyond Neptune. Some of the Kuiper Belt's objects are dynamically "hot"; they were stirred up and scattered by the gravity of at least one nearby cluster star making a close pass in early days.

Like other open clusters, the Sun's birth cluster disintegrated with time. Most of its stars have long since drifted away and are mixed irretrievably into the swarms of the Milky Way — strung out during the approximately 27 orbits that they and the Sun have made around the galaxy since their origin long ago.

However, about 10 to 60 of the Sun's nestmates (a few percent) should still remain closer than 300 light-years from us and are still traveling in parallel with us, according to Portegies Zwart. The European Space Agency's upcoming Gaia astrometry satellite should be able to sort them out by their space motions. Their exact chemical abundances might then give them away for sure.

“Finding even a few,” writes Portegies Zwart, “will strongly constrain the parameters of the parental star cluster and the location in the Galaxy where we were born.” Don't expect them to look like anything special, though. The Sun is very ordinary among stars, and so were the circumstances of its origin.>>
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-long-lost-siblings-of-the-sun wrote:
From the November 2009 Scientific American Magazine
The Long-Lost Siblings of the Sun ( Preview )
The sun was born in a family of stars. What became of them?
By Simon F. Portegies Zwart

<<Had you been alive at the dawn of the solar system, the night sky would have been bright enough to read by. A thousand or so stars formed within a few light-years from the same interstellar cloud the sun did.

* The sun is a solitary star, and astronomers have traditionally assumed it formed as such. Yet most stars are born in clusters, and scraps of evidence from meteorites and from the arrangement of comets suggest that our sun was no exception.

* Its birth cluster could have contained 1,500 to 3,500 stars within a diameter of 10 light-years—a big, unhappy family whose larger members bullied the small fry and which broke up not long after our solar system came into being.

* Although the sun’s siblings have long since dispersed across the galaxy, observatories such as the European GAIA satellite will be able to look for them. Their properties might fill in the gaps of the solar system’s deep history.

People have often sought solitude in the starry night sky, and it is an appropriate place for that. The night is dark because, in cosmic terms, our sun and its family of planets are very lonely. Neighboring stars are so far away that they look like mere specks of light, and more distant stars blur together into a feeble glow. Our fastest space probes will take tens of thousands of years to cross the distance to the nearest star. Space isolates us like an ocean around a tiny island.

Yet not all stars are so secluded. About one in 10 belongs to a cluster, a swarm of hundreds to tens of thousands of stars with a diameter of a few light-years. In fact, most stars are born in such groups, which generally disperse over billions of years, their stars blending in with the rest of the galaxy. What about our sun? Might it, too, have come into existence in a star cluster? If so, our location in the galaxy was not always so desolate. It only became so as the cluster dispersed in due time.>>
-----------------------------
Zwart Neuendorffer

Re: APOD: Young Suns of NGC 7129 (2010 Sep 04)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:36 pm
by bystander
Boswell wrote:Would it be possible to track the path of our solar system back to its beginnings to determine its Galactic birth location. Was our solar system closer to the Galactic center? Was our sun born in a similar cluster. If we knew our galactic birthplace would this answer question about where all the gold and heavier elements come from and how we ended up between the galactic arms. Best of all is our sun traveling out of the galaxy or is it being pulled inward toward the center. If this were possible than we could try and find our sun's sister systems which might have similar planets like earth.
There was a thread in the Library on this topic: In which nebula was our sun formed?
Although the thread often drifted off topic, there are still some interesting comments there.