Starship Asterisk*

http://www.controversial-science.com/artifacts/compelling-lunar-anomalies.html wrote:
<<Following is one of at least 12 known versions of Apollo 10 frame AS10-32-4822. (Exactly why there are a dozen or more versions of this frame is outside the scope of this brief overview, though that fact begs some explanation by the space agency.) Though it is inexplicably blacked out in the official NASA image catalogue, frame "4822" can still be ordered from the space agency. The image shows a number of striking anomalies, not the least of which is a vast region of rectilinear structure looking for all the world like an extremely dilapidated city (hence its nickname "L.A. on the moon"). Other strange features include a peculiar square "crater" scored by razor straight notches and surrounded by honeycomb like "mountains.">>

http://www.ufomystic.com/2007/11/14/square-craters-moon/ wrote:

• …there are only two possible over-all conclusions:
  The first is that I have applied procrustean reasoning to an accident of nature; in short, that I am seeing things that are not there. The second is that we are confronted with an alien artifact at least 3.9 billion years old and of truly colossal proportions.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=44264 wrote:

wonderboy wrote:It would definetely be interesting to explore the area, I remember reading somewhere that dome like structures were seen on the moon (covered in regolith mind) which these madmen who found them claimed to be cities for that they should have been ejecta'd from the planet at 90 degrees.