(Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
(Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
This is not an iridescent cloud nor are water droplets responsible. It is a halo, a circumhorizon arc (http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/cha2.htm) produced by refraction in hexagonal plate shaped ice crystals in cirrus. Note the structure parallel to the horizon and the structured gradation of color from red at the top through green to blue. Both are characteristic of the halo.
Les Cowley
Atmospheric Optics - http://www.atoptics.co.uk
Les Cowley
Atmospheric Optics - http://www.atoptics.co.uk
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio May12
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090512.htmlatoptics wrote:This is not an iridescent cloud nor are water droplets responsible. It is a halo, a circumhorizon arc (http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/cha2.htm) produced by refraction in hexagonal plate shaped ice crystals in cirrus. Note the structure parallel to the horizon and the structured gradation of color from red at the top through green to blue. Both are characteristic of the halo.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080610.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040804.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040413.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap071125.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050928.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumhorizontal_arc wrote:
<<A circumhorizontal arc (also popularly called fire rainbow) is a rare optical phenomenon. In order to be observed, the sun must be high in the sky, at an elevation of [46°] or more, and can only occur in the presence of cirrus clouds. As a result it cannot be observed at locations north of [the Arctic Circle] or south of [the Antarctic Circle], although occasionally at higher latitudes from mountains. In areas of Northern Europe it can only be observed around the time of the Summer solstice. If cloud conditions are right it is seen along the horizon on the same side of the sky as the sun.
The arc is formed as light rays enter the [near] horizontally-oriented flat hexagon crystals through a [near] vertical side face and exit through the [near] horizontal bottom face. It is the 90° inclination that produces the well-separated rainbow-like colours and, if the crystal alignment is just right, makes the entire cirrus cloud appear to shine like an undulating rainbow.
Although quite rare, it is not the rarest of all natural phenomenon. The Kern arc and Lowitz arc are even rarer.
A circumhorizontal arc can be confused with an infralateral arc when the sun is high in the sky; the former is always oriented horizontally whereas the latter is oriented as a section of a rainbow, e.g. as an arc stretching upwards from the horizon.>>
Last edited by neufer on Tue May 12, 2009 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Art Neuendorffer
-
- Asternaut
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:48 am
- Location: Paris, FRANCE
- Contact:
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio May12
I totally agree with Mr Cowley, these are not irridescents clouds, but circumhorizon arc. One more thing about iridescent clouds, is that the sun is not far from the direction of look (maybe a douzen a degree at maximum). For circumhorizon, the sun is at least at 46° from the optic phenomenon. If the picture poster has taken the whole scene, we will see that the sun is way high up from the phenomenon.
Most of the time, the confusion is due to the fact the circumhorizon is very bright. Another thing we can see on the pictures neufer linked, you have repetition of colors for iridescent phenomenon (due to the interferences effect by water droplets) that you have not for circumhorizon (refraction and simple color dispersion effect).
Most of the time, the confusion is due to the fact the circumhorizon is very bright. Another thing we can see on the pictures neufer linked, you have repetition of colors for iridescent phenomenon (due to the interferences effect by water droplets) that you have not for circumhorizon (refraction and simple color dispersion effect).
Last edited by trumpetman012 on Tue May 12, 2009 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Erie-descent into hell
APOD needs to revise a header!
Is there any precedent for this?
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090512.html
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Is there any precedent for this?
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090512.html
atoptics wrote:This is not an iridescent cloud nor are water droplets responsible. It is a halo, a circumhorizon arc (http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/cha2.htm) produced by refraction in hexagonal plate shaped ice crystals in cirrus. Note the structure parallel to the horizon and the structured gradation of color from red at the top through green to blue. Both are characteristic of the halo.
Art Neuendorffer
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Art, imo you missed the most spectacular one
APOD: 2003 October 14 - Iridescent Clouds Over Aiguille de la Tsa
APOD: 2003 October 14 - Iridescent Clouds Over Aiguille de la Tsa
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Yes, those are nice iridescent water clouds...bystander wrote:Art, imo you missed the most spectacular one
APOD: 2003 October 14 - Iridescent Clouds Over Aiguille de la Tsa
but we are really talking about circumhorizon cirrus arcs
and getting the APOD corrected as it now has been:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090512.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
I have a bit of a quibble about the Wikipedia argument that the sun has to be 57.8° high
since that is only technically true if the falling ice crystals are perfectly horizontal.
Allowing for some (minimal) falling ice crystal fluttering
(or, perhaps, non-vertical falling as in the case of horse hair cirrus)
the sun really only has to be about 46° high.
However, a 68° high sun (with 22° high clouds) is still optimal
so a ~58° high sun is probably a reasonable practical minimum.
Art Neuendorffer
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Any idea what is that bright object near the top of the image; the one just above what looks like a contrail? Perhaps an artifact?
Thanks
Thanks
-
- Commander
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:20 pm
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Look! It's a bird ... It's a plane ... No its Sup ... Aww, its just a plane's vapor trail .Karthik wrote:Any idea what is that bright object near the top of the image; the one just above what looks like a contrail? Perhaps an artifact?
Thanks
Speculation ≠ Science
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Actually, I was inquiring about the bright, round object above the vapor trail.Dr. Skeptic wrote:Look! It's a bird ... It's a plane ... No its Sup ... Aww, its just a plane's vapor trail .Karthik wrote:Any idea what is that bright object near the top of the image; the one just above what looks like a contrail? Perhaps an artifact?
Thanks
Thanks
-
- Commander
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:57 pm
- Location: On a boat near Tacoma, WA, usa
- Contact:
WAKE UP Sheeple, , yer snoozing, , , LOL
This new forum stinks, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Anyone else notice that these odd rainbow effects are VERY RECENT ? ? ?
Like in the past decade ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Yer FUNNY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !~
Anyone else notice that these odd rainbow effects are VERY RECENT ? ? ?
Like in the past decade ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Yer FUNNY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !~
"It's not what you know, or don't know, but what you know that isn't so that will hurt you." Will Rodgers 1938
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
I would say you have 1 of 4 choicesKarthik wrote:Actually, I was inquiring about the bright, round object above the vapor trail.Dr. Skeptic wrote:Look! It's a bird ... It's a plane ... No its Sup ... Aww, its just a plane's vapor trail .Karthik wrote:Any idea what is that bright object near the top of the image; the one just above what looks like a contrail? Perhaps an artifact?
Thanks
Thanks
Choice 1) The planet Venus can appear this bright in the daytime sky especially through a polarized lens (but venus is too near the sun to be visible during the day)
Choice 2) The ISS is slightly brighter than Venus now and is also visible in the day time skies.
Choice 3) a mylar balloon reflecting sunlight
Choice 4) most likely a bad pixel on the ccd sensor in the camera.
-
- Science Officer
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:55 am
- Location: Oakworth, Yorkshire, England
- Contact:
Re: WAKE UP Sheeple, , yer snoozing, , , LOL
The forum stinks? Funny, I can't smell anything.craterchains wrote:This new forum stinks, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Anyone else notice that these odd rainbow effects are VERY RECENT ? ? ?
Like in the past decade ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Yer FUNNY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !~
Say what you mean for goodness sake, that way people can understand you better.
Regards,
Andy.
Andy.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:20 pm
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Looking at the "full view" there is a similar anomaly (not as bright) dead center of the picture just under the cloud.Karthik wrote:Actually, I was inquiring about the bright, round object above the vapor trail.Dr. Skeptic wrote:Look! It's a bird ... It's a plane ... No its Sup ... Aww, its just a plane's vapor trail .Karthik wrote:Any idea what is that bright object near the top of the image; the one just above what looks like a contrail? Perhaps an artifact?
Thanks
Thanks
Speculation ≠ Science
-
- Commander
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:57 pm
- Location: On a boat near Tacoma, WA, usa
- Contact:
Re: WAKE UP Sheeple, , yer snoozing, , , LOL
mmmm k, This new forum style and layout are very poor IMHO, the old one was quite adequate. Why change it?Andy Wade wrote:The forum stinks? Funny, I can't smell anything.craterchains wrote:This new forum stinks, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Anyone else notice that these odd rainbow effects are VERY RECENT ? ? ?
Like in the past decade ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Yer FUNNY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !~
Say what you mean for goodness sake, that way people can understand you better.
(The Ne likes the colors better?)
There are more Rainbow pictures here;
http://asterisk.apod.com/vie ... =11&t=5334
Also a good You Tube video (there are others too if you search for them)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NqL9Ez4 ... annel_page
"It's not what you know, or don't know, but what you know that isn't so that will hurt you." Will Rodgers 1938
-
- Commander
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:55 pm
- AKA: Sputnick
Re: WAKE UP Sheeple, , yer snoozing, , , LOL
To much waste space on the right hand side, but otherise I think the format's okay.craterchains wrote:
mmmm k, This new forum style and layout are very poor IMHO, the old one was quite adequate. Why change it?
Duty done .. the rain will stop as promised with the rainbow.
"Abandon the Consensus for Individual Thought"
"Abandon the Consensus for Individual Thought"
-
- Science Officer
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Old Orchard Beach, Maine
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Hello craterchains,
I've missed seeing your quote by Will Rogers, always was a wise reminder for me. Good to hear from you.
I've missed seeing your quote by Will Rogers, always was a wise reminder for me. Good to hear from you.
"Everything matters.....So may the facts be with you"-astrolabe
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
I would have guessed Venus except for the fact that it is circular and Venus would be crescent shaped.BMAONE23 wrote:I would say you have 1 of 4 choicesKarthik wrote:Any idea what is that bright object near the top of the image; the one just above what looks like a contrail? Perhaps an artifact?
Choice 1) The planet Venus can appear this bright in the daytime sky especially through a polarized lens
(but venus is too near the sun to be visible during the day)
Choice 2) The ISS is slightly brighter than Venus now and is also visible in the day time skies.
Choice 3) a mylar balloon reflecting sunlight
Choice 4) most likely a bad pixel on the ccd sensor in the camera.
How aboutDr. Skeptic wrote:Looking at the "full view" there is a similar anomaly (not as bright) dead center of the picture just under the cloud.
Karthik's bright object is from Mars.
Dr. Skeptic bright object is from Venus.
Art Neuendorffer
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
The explanation of the apod says that the photo was taken using a polarising lens. Would the colours appear if it was not polarised?atoptics wrote:This is not an iridescent cloud nor are water droplets responsible. It is a halo, a circumhorizon arc (http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/cha2.htm) produced by refraction in hexagonal plate shaped ice crystals in cirrus. Note the structure parallel to the horizon and the structured gradation of color from red at the top through green to blue. Both are characteristic of the halo.
Les Cowley
Atmospheric Optics - http://www.atoptics.co.uk
- Jim
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Sure, but they would be more washed out:grump wrote:The explanation of the apod says that the photo was taken using a polarising lens. Would the colours appear if it was not polarised?atoptics wrote:This is not an iridescent cloud nor are water droplets responsible. It is a halo, a circumhorizon arc (http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/cha2.htm) produced by refraction in hexagonal plate shaped ice crystals in cirrus. Note the structure parallel to the horizon and the structured gradation of color from red at the top through green to blue. Both are characteristic of the halo.
The circumhorizontal arc is due to (near Brewster angle) ice crystal prisms refracting mostly vertically polarized light.
The background blue sky color is from little horizontal dielectric dipoles creating horizontally polarized noise light near the circumhorizon arc.
A vertical polarizer helps us to see other planets during the day (as well as circumhorizontal arcs) by cutting out singularly scattered blue Rayleigh scattering.
Art Neuendorffer
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18459
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: (Not) An Iridescent Cloud Over Ohio (2009 May 12)
Or more simply, it improves contrast.neufer wrote:A vertical polarizer helps us to see other planets during the day (as well as circumhorizontal arcs) by cutting out singularly scattered blue Rayleigh scattering.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com