Signal to Noise Ratio
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 4:49 pm
The signal to noise ratio of the APOD forum is far too low to be acceptable.
The "booboiserie" are in ascendance, and are drowning out anything resembling a conversation among intelligent people interested in the field of astronomy. Their posts range from bizarre (and long-winded) non-sequiters to low-brow school yard taunts, from just plain dumb remarks to anti-scientific diatribes, from drum beating for pet theories to piling on in what can only be deliberate and repeated attempts to drown out sense and science.
I haven't been here long, and, having lost patience, I won't be here much longer. I fear for the future when a forum like this can be overrun by the stupid, the ignorant, the self-aggrandizing and the devious.
I can only assume there are other places where sensible discussion takes place. Perhaps someone will post a link to such discussions, if only to hasten my departure. But I'll hang on long enough to see what reponse this cry for help elicits.
Rob
PS
Lest there be any confusion, I must thank Chris Peterson in particular for his continued attempts to redress the balance, to correct basic flaws, to remind others of what science really is -- though how he has the patience to keep trying I do not know.
The "booboiserie" are in ascendance, and are drowning out anything resembling a conversation among intelligent people interested in the field of astronomy. Their posts range from bizarre (and long-winded) non-sequiters to low-brow school yard taunts, from just plain dumb remarks to anti-scientific diatribes, from drum beating for pet theories to piling on in what can only be deliberate and repeated attempts to drown out sense and science.
I haven't been here long, and, having lost patience, I won't be here much longer. I fear for the future when a forum like this can be overrun by the stupid, the ignorant, the self-aggrandizing and the devious.
I can only assume there are other places where sensible discussion takes place. Perhaps someone will post a link to such discussions, if only to hasten my departure. But I'll hang on long enough to see what reponse this cry for help elicits.
Rob
PS
Lest there be any confusion, I must thank Chris Peterson in particular for his continued attempts to redress the balance, to correct basic flaws, to remind others of what science really is -- though how he has the patience to keep trying I do not know.