Starship Asterisk*

Hi everybody!

This is just hypothetical. Could it be that only one Galaxy exists in our universe, and all the others are mirror imaged at a higher dimension or intelligence, which is calculating everything so we see what we see? Which are the proofs against this (maybe unrealistic) hypothesis?

Eternity wrote:Hi everybody!

This is just hypothetical. Could it be that only one Galaxy exists in our universe, and all the others are mirror imaged at a higher dimension or intelligence, which is calculating everything so we see what we see? Which are the proofs against this (maybe unrealistic) hypothesis?

Thanks for the answers!

I think you're being ignored.

why stop, at other galaxies, how about everything we see imaged by intelligence? have you seen the matrix movie from 1999?

Eternity wrote:Which are the proofs against this (maybe unrealistic) hypothesis?

That's not the way science is supposed to work. Theories (hypotheses) are to be proven, not disproven, although sometimes in attempting to prove a hypothesis, we find it is false. The burden is upon you to prove your hypothesis, not for us to disprove it.

Which are the proofs against this (maybe unrealistic) hypothesis?

Our ancient philosophers use to think this way untill Science got evolved with technology in rise i suppose.

Superdoc wrote:Our ancient philosophers use to think this way untill Science got evolved with technology in rise i suppose.

Huh??? What does this mean?

This is Eternity: It was just a little bit a -I know- provocative idea to inspire and stretch the imagination; and I simply didn't know if there are real proves against it. Of course, I myself can't prove it since I am not an astronomer and I am also convinced that the picture of our universe we are having is -more or less, as far it concerns our realities- correct. Still thanks for the answers for this special question..

I have always thought that the Supermassive black holes at the center of Galaxys are "attached" to one another. for example... stars falling into our own (sagA*) would then be deposited by exiting another supermassive black hole (say in Andromeda)

bongman wrote:I have always thought that the Supermassive black holes at the center of Galaxys are "attached" to one another. for example... stars falling into our own (sagA*) would then be deposited by exiting another supermassive black hole (say in Andromeda)

The problem with that is nothing ever leaves a black hole. Maybe in another dimension.

other then the Physics of a black hole state otherwise (once in, no information leaves) its still interesting to wonder where things go once they pass the event horizion, maybe it all exits outside the Hubble sphere haha