Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:16 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond Space and Time , by John L. Dobson
[non-science reference removed]
Non Science reference removed, you really haven't a clue do you.
The Electric Sky by Don Scott was removed for political and religeous reasons from the BBT , The Church, and the political establishment nature which controls funding and ideology within the sciences today. Wake Up. and start behaving like scientists instead of theologians in dire fear of the Truth. Mainstream Science is behaving like a religion and not like a science, when you deny and refuse any mention of the electrical nature of matter.
kovil, the Rules for posting to the Asterisk Café are quite explicit (emphasis added):kovil wrote:Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:16 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond Space and Time , by John L. Dobson
[non-science reference removed]
Non Science reference removed, you really haven't a clue do you.
The Electric Sky by Don Scott was removed for political and religeous reasons from the BBT , The Church, and the political establishment nature which controls funding and ideology within the sciences today. Wake Up. and start behaving like scientists instead of theologians in dire fear of the Truth. Mainstream Science is behaving like a religion and not like a science, when you deny and refuse any mention of the electrical nature of matter.
To the extent that Scott's book accepts a fundamental tenet of plasma cosmology (namely, "Since every part of the universe we observe is evolving, it assumes that the universe itself is evolving as well, though a scalar expansion as predicted from the FRW metric is not accepted as part of this evolution"), then it is non-science. There are, no doubt, other aspects of Scott's book that make it non-science, but one is enough.And last, once again, this is a scientific forum, devoted to discussing astronomy.
For avoidance of doubt, this has nothing whatsoever to do with refusal to consider, or discuss," the electrical nature of matter"
If you'd like to understand why this particular tenet of plasma cosmology is non-science, I'd be happy to explain it in considerable detail; for some background, you may wish to read this.
Similarly, if you'd like to join in the discussion in this Café thread, on the nature of modern astrophysics as science, please do so.
This thread was created by splitting posts from the view from the center of the universe, a Café thread.