Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:41 am
by harry
Hello Michael
My time has been very short on the net.
Moving office and home has been massive. At the same time taking care of two very large projects.
Regardless I always find time to read you posts.
Great work.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:33 pm
by cosmo_uk
Hey MM
Its nice to see you doing some live research on this thread. I'll keep my eye on it.
Cosmo
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:00 pm
by harry
Hello Michael
Well done. I read your posts and find them very scientific orientated.
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:49 am
by harry
Hello Michael
The question is:
What drives these active regions?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:07 pm
by harry
Hello Michael
Thank you for the above post.
Looks great.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:53 am
by harry
Hello Michael can you read this link and let me know what you think.
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?art ... ords=#dest
Global warming has been deemed a fact. However, the inconvenient truth is that humans are not causing it. Al Gore has been given poor advice. Like Darwin's theory of evolution and Big Bang cosmology, global warming by greenhouse gas emissions has undergone that curious social process in which a scientific theory is promoted to a secular myth. When in fact, science is ignorant about the source of the heat — the Sun.
The really inconvenient truth is that we cannot control Nature. But we can begin to learn our true place in the Universe and figure out how to cope rationally with inevitable change. Clearly, reducing air pollution is an admirable goal in itself. But we must not be deluded into thinking it will affect climate significantly. The connection between warming and atmospheric pollution is more asserted than demonstrated, while the connection with variations in the Sun has been demonstrated.
Smile
If I know Neried she would say its a crank pot link.
Neried reminds me of my wife.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:22 am
by harry
Hello Michael
Nice image.
Question:1
Sun spots have high gravitaional/electromagnetic convection currents flowing into the sun. With these forces how can you tell if the temp is higher or lower than other parts of the sun.
Q2:
How similar are the jets created by the sun compared to other jets?
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:22 am
by THX1138
This is interesting stuff to say the least, but scary too! What per chance would be the outcome of a very large CME direct hit on this planet? Besides the obvious loss of one or all of the satellites in harms way, could a real, real big one conceivably fry one side of this rock.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:15 am
by harry
Hello All
Just because it look darker does not mean it is cooler. We commumicate with light speed.
Grav/Electromagnetic forces are being pulled in and therefore the amount of light escaping would be reduced, giving us a false reading.
Just athought.
==================================
On another topic
I came across a link that correlated the size of the neucleon to the structure of the galaxy.
Smaller neucleon spiral galaxy,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,as the neucleon gets bigger the galaxy envelope does also,,,,,,,,,,when we see large so called black holes we get galaxies such as M87, where the galaxy envelope is elliptical and very active as though the jet ejects matter reforming the galaxy.
Trying to find the link
be back