Re: The thousand post club
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 9:22 pm
![:P :p:](./images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Laughing :lol2:](./images/smilies/asterisk_laugh.gif)
APOD and General Astronomy Discussion Forum
https://asterisk.apod.com/
A puppy? Have you got a picture of it?orin stepanek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:22 pm I was looking for this puppy; and here it is!!!![]()
![]()
hooray!!! Better check my glasses!
Ann wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 12:41 amA puppy? Have you got a picture of it?orin stepanek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:22 pm I was looking for this puppy; and here it is!!! hooray!!! Better check my glasses!
Ann
orin stepanek wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 1:43 am
We rescued her from Paws and Claws after Sassy passed!
Her Name is Magic!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws wrote:
British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law is the best known and most widely cited. They were part of his ideas in his extensive writings about the future:
- 1) When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2) The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3) Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from Magic.
A law which I think is quite wrong. Once a people is sufficiently advanced scientifically (as are we), no technology, no matter how advanced, will ever be interpreted as magic. It will simply be seen as technology that isn't understood.
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:35 amA law which I think is quite wrong.
Once a people is sufficiently advanced scientifically (as are we [sic]), no technology, no matter how advanced, will ever be interpreted as magic. It will simply be seen as technology that isn't understood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptions_of_religious_imagery_in_natural_phenomena wrote:
<<Perceptions of religious imagery in natural phenomena, sometimes called simulacra, are sightings of images with spiritual or religious themes or import to the perceiver. The phenomenon appears to approach a cultural universal and may often accompany nature worship, animism, and fetishism, along with more formal or organized belief systems.
Within Christian traditions, many instances reported involve images of Jesus or other Christian figures seen in food. Sightings of this type have been reported in such varied media as cloud photos, Marmite, chapatis, shadows, Cheetos, tortillas, trees, dental x-rays, cooking utensils, windows rocks and stones, painted and plastered walls, and dogs' hindquarters. Again, some of these items have been offered for sale on internet auction sites, and a number have been bought by the Golden Palace casino. When such images receive publicity, people frequently come considerable distances to see them, and to venerate them.
On April 30, 2002 the Hubble Space Science Institute released new photographs of the Cone Nebula, also known as the Space Mountain, to showcase a new extremely high resolution camera. Shortly afterwards some began to call it the "Jesus Nebula", believing they could see Jesus's face in it. The new camera was installed on Hubble by astronauts during a space shuttle mission in March 2002. The Cone Nebula, located in the constellation Monoceros, is a region that contains cones, pillars, and majestic flowing shapes that abound in stellar nurseries where natal clouds of gas and dust are buffeted by energetic winds from nurseries of newborn stars.>>
But those are religious nuts. I'm talking about scientifically advanced people. We are a scientifically advance culture that has a certain number of poorly informed people who lack critical thinking skills. They may see ghosts, but that doesn't mean everyone does. (Some of them probably think smart phones are magic!)neufer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:23 pmChris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:35 amA law which I think is quite wrong.
Once a people is sufficiently advanced scientifically (as are we [sic]), no technology, no matter how advanced, will ever be interpreted as magic. It will simply be seen as technology that isn't understood.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptions_of_religious_imagery_in_natural_phenomena wrote:
<<Perceptions of religious imagery in natural phenomena, sometimes called simulacra, are sightings of images with spiritual or religious themes or import to the perceiver. The phenomenon appears to approach a cultural universal and may often accompany nature worship, animism, and fetishism, along with more formal or organized belief systems.
Within Christian traditions, many instances reported involve images of Jesus or other Christian figures seen in food. Sightings of this type have been reported in such varied media as cloud photos, Marmite, chapatis, shadows, Cheetos, tortillas, trees, dental x-rays, cooking utensils, windows rocks and stones, painted and plastered walls, and dogs' hindquarters. Again, some of these items have been offered for sale on internet auction sites, and a number have been bought by the Golden Palace casino. When such images receive publicity, people frequently come considerable distances to see them, and to venerate them.
On April 30, 2002 the Hubble Space Science Institute released new photographs of the Cone Nebula, also known as the Space Mountain, to showcase a new extremely high resolution camera. Shortly afterwards some began to call it the "Jesus Nebula", believing they could see Jesus's face in it. The new camera was installed on Hubble by astronauts during a space shuttle mission in March 2002. The Cone Nebula, located in the constellation Monoceros, is a region that contains cones, pillars, and majestic flowing shapes that abound in stellar nurseries where natal clouds of gas and dust are buffeted by energetic winds from nurseries of newborn stars.>>
A certain number that's large enough to dominate the Electoral College ... though.Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:26 pm
We are a scientifically advance culture that has
a certain number of poorly informed people who lack critical thinking skills.
Sadly true. But when I refer to a scientifically advanced or literate society, I increasingly mean parts of the world more advanced than the U.S. We're not exactly leading the way intellectually these days. Not scientifically, not socially.neufer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:22 pmA certain number that's large enough to dominate the Electoral College ... though.Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:26 pm
We are a scientifically advance culture that has
a certain number of poorly informed people who lack critical thinking skills.
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:13 pmSadly true. But when I refer to a scientifically advanced or literate society, I increasingly mean parts of the world more advanced than the U.S. We're not exactly leading the way intellectually these days. Not scientifically, not socially.neufer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:22 pmA certain number that's large enough to dominate the Electoral College ... though.Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:26 pm
We are a scientifically advance culture that has
a certain number of poorly informed people who lack critical thinking skills.
http://stuppid.com/jesus-christ-cloned/ wrote:
<<A billionaire-funded Christian organization is currently working to clone Jesus Christ after obtaining DNA from the Shroud of Turin and feel confident they will have a Jesus clone in 2016. “No longer can we rely on hope and prayer, waiting around futilely for Jesus to return. We have the technology to bring him back right now: there is no reason, moral, legal or Biblical, not to take advantage of it.”>>
Man, I wish they could actually do that. Since the Shroud of Turin has already been demonstrated to be a forgery produced much less than 2000 years ago, it would be hilarious to see their faces when they clone a pig or some flower or whatever the actual pigment source was!neufer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 6:12 pmChris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:13 pm Sadly true. But when I refer to a scientifically advanced or literate society, I increasingly mean parts of the world more advanced than the U.S. We're not exactly leading the way intellectually these days. Not scientifically, not socially.http://stuppid.com/jesus-christ-cloned/ wrote:
<<A billionaire-funded Christian organization is currently working to clone Jesus Christ after obtaining DNA from the Shroud of Turin and feel confident they will have a Jesus clone in 2016. “No longer can we rely on hope and prayer, waiting around futilely for Jesus to return. We have the technology to bring him back right now: there is no reason, moral, legal or Biblical, not to take advantage of it.”>>
No doubt she was helped by a higher power (in her case, human, being humane).orin stepanek wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:37 pm Magic does exist! It is in the eyes of the beholder! This is MagicIMG_0416.JPG And we love her very much! She got her name by appearing at Paws and Claws overnight! No one knows how she got over that 10 ft fence; but lo and behold; in tne morning; there she was1![]()
A Big +1BDanielMayfield wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:43 pmNo doubt she was helped by a higher power (in her case, human, being humane).orin stepanek wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:37 pm Magic does exist! It is in the eyes of the beholder! This is MagicIMG_0416.JPG And we love her very much! She got her name by appearing at Paws and Claws overnight! No one knows how she got over that 10 ft fence; but lo and behold; in tne morning; there she was1![]()
[/quote]neufer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:23 pm
Within Christian traditions, many instances reported involve images of Jesus or other Christian figures seen in food. Sightings of this type have been reported in such varied media as cloud photos, Marmite, chapatis, shadows, Cheetos, tortillas, trees, dental x-rays, cooking utensils, windows rocks and stones, painted and plastered walls, and dogs' hindquarters. Again, some of these items have been offered for sale on internet auction sites, and a number have been bought by the Golden Palace casino. When such images receive publicity, people frequently come considerable distances to see them, and to venerate them.
On April 30, 2002 the Hubble Space Science Institute released new photographs of the Cone Nebula, also known as the Space Mountain, to showcase a new extremely high resolution camera. Shortly afterwards some began to call it the "Jesus Nebula", believing they could see Jesus's face in it. The new camera was installed on Hubble by astronauts during a space shuttle mission in March 2002. The Cone Nebula, located in the constellation Monoceros, is a region that contains cones, pillars, and majestic flowing shapes that abound in stellar nurseries where natal clouds of gas and dust are buffeted by energetic winds from nurseries of newborn stars.>>
Why does he have a baboon on his back?Ann wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:23 pmThe Cone Nebula would be the Jesus nebula? Come on! Can't you see that the rightmost pillar of the Pillars of Creation is the Jesus nebula? Look at his profile, looking left. There's the forehead, the eyebrow, the nose, the open mouth, even the beard. And his arms are outstretched. In this particular image he's got a red X-ray blob right on his cheek, but that is probably just a pimple. Admittedly his hair at the top of his head is a bit messy.The Pillars of Creation. The Jesus pillar at right.
X-RAY: NASA/CXC/INAF/M.GUARCELLO ET AL.; OPTICAL: NASA/STSCI
Who knows? By the way, I think it's a cat.Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 11:03 pmWhy does he have a baboon on his back?Ann wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:23 pmThe Cone Nebula would be the Jesus nebula? Come on! Can't you see that the rightmost pillar of the Pillars of Creation is the Jesus nebula? Look at his profile, looking left. There's the forehead, the eyebrow, the nose, the open mouth, even the beard. And his arms are outstretched. In this particular image he's got a red X-ray blob right on his cheek, but that is probably just a pimple. Admittedly his hair at the top of his head is a bit messy.The Pillars of Creation. The Jesus pillar at right.
X-RAY: NASA/CXC/INAF/M.GUARCELLO ET AL.; OPTICAL: NASA/STSCI
Say "Lava Lamp blobs" 3 times fast.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metonic_cycle wrote:
<<For astronomy and calendar studies, the Metonic cycle or Enneadecaeteris (from Ancient Greek: ἐννεακαιδεκαετηρίς (enneakaidekateris), "nineteen years") is a period of an almost exactly 19 years that is nearly a common multiple of the solar year and the synodic (lunar) month. The Greek astronomer Meton of Athens (fifth century BC) observed that a period of 19 years is almost exactly equal to 235 synodic months and, rounded to full days, counts 6,940 days. The difference between the two periods (of 19 solar years and 235 synodic months) is only a few hours, depending on the definition of the year. When Meton introduced the cycle around 432 BC, it was already known by Babylonian astronomers. A mechanical computation of the cycle is built into the Antikythera mechanism. The cycle was used in the Babylonian calendar, ancient Chinese calendar systems and the medieval computus (i.e., the calculation of the date of Easter). It regulates the 19-year cycle of intercalary months of the modern Hebrew calendar.>>
Code: Select all
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bystander 19005 / 3.94 ppd since Mon Aug 28, 2006 / Apathetic Retiree
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
neufer 16448 / 3.81 ppd since Mon Jan 21, 2008 / Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Chris Peterson 14619 / 3.13 ppd since Wed Jan 31, 2007 / Abominable-Snowman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ånn 9910 / 2.86 ppd since Sat May 29, 2010 / 4725 Å
geckzilla 8999 / 2.02 ppd since Wed Sep 12, 2007 / Ocular Digitator
owlice 8356 / 1.50 ppd since Wed Aug 02, 2004 / Guardian of the Codes
Beyond 6889 / 1.83 ppd since Tue Aug 04, 2009 / 500 Gigaderps
Orin Stepanek 5109 / 0.98 ppd since Wed Jul 27, 2005 / Plutopian
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BMAONE23 4076 / 0.76 ppd since Wed Feb 23, 2005 / Commentator Model 1.23
APOD Robot 3725 / 1.02 ppd since Thu Dec 03, 2009 / Otto Posterman
starsurfer 3677 / 1.35 ppd since Thu Mar 15, 2012 / Stellar Cartographer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry 2881 / 0.56 ppd since Fri Nov 18, 2005 / G'day G'day G'day G'day
Nitpicker 2690 / 1.20 ppd since Thu Sep 19, 2013 / Inverse Square
rstevenson 2598 / 0.66 ppd since Fri Mar 28, 2008 / Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Boomer12k 2593 / 0.57 ppd since Sat Apr 21, 2007 / :---[===]*
BDanielMayfield 2156 / 0.81 ppd since Thu Aug 02, 2012 / Don't bring me down
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MargaritaMc 1836 / 0.73 ppd since Wed Jan 09, 2013 / Look to the Evenstar
RJN 1509 / 0.27 ppd since Sat Jul 24, 2004 / Baffled Boffin
Sandgirl 1500 / 0.70 ppd since Tue Jun 25, 2013 / Captain
ta152h0 1346 / 0.28 ppd since Sun Aug 28, 2005 / Schooled
emc 1235 / 0.28 ppd since Tue Jul 17, 2007 / Equine Locutionist
JohnD 1185 / 0.22 ppd since Wed Feb 16, 2005 / Tea Time, Guv! Cheerio!
apodman 1171 / 0.31 ppd since Wed Aug 15, 2007 / Teapot Fancier (MIA)
DavidLeodis 1169 / 0.27 ppd since Wed May 01, 2006 / Perceptatron
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MarkBour 950 / 0.42 ppd since Mon Aug 26, 2013 / Subtle Signal
Ron-Astro Pharmacist 889 / 0.35 ppd since Thu Jan 03, 2013 / Resistored Fizzacist
NoelC 876 / 0.17 ppd since Sat Nov 19, 2005 / Creepy Spock
alter-ego 851 / 0.20 ppd since Sun Apr 20, 2008 / Serendipitous Sleuthhound
Nereid 832 / 0.18 ppd since Thu Sep 28, 2006 / Intrepidus Dux Emeritus
Anthony Barreiro 793 / 0.32 ppd since Wed May 11, 2011 / Turtles all the way down
Rothkko 689 / 0.24 ppd since Thu Apr 08, 2010 / Lieutenant
Moonlady 665 / 0.31 ppd since Fri Apr 13, 2012 / Selenian
saturno2 636 / 0.23 ppd since Wed Jun 29, 2011 / Commander
dougettinger 632 / 0.22 ppd since Wed Mar 17, 2010 / Curious Querier
Case 592 / 0.13 ppd since Sat Jun 09, 2007 / Commander
Fred the Cat 589 / 0.49 ppd since Mon Feb 22, 2016 / Theoretic Apothekitty
Qev 576 / 0.14 ppd since Wed Mar 08, 2006 / Ontological Cartographer
wonderboy 569 / 0.20 ppd since Sun Jan 31, 2010 / Commander
Doum 523 / 0.11 ppd since Fri Feb 18, 2005 / A personalized rank.
iamlucky13 515 / 0.12 ppd since Thu May 25, 2006 / Commander
Dr. Skeptic 507 / 0.12 ppd since Thu Jul 27, 2006 / Commander
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code: Select all
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bystander 19143 / 3.94 ppd since Mon Aug 28, 2006 / Apathetic Retiree
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
neufer 16603 / 3.81 ppd since Mon Jan 21, 2008 / Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Chris Peterson 14714 / 3.13 ppd since Wed Jan 31, 2007 / Abominable-Snowman
Ånn 10000 / 2.86 ppd since Sat May 29, 2010 / 4725 Å
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
geckzilla 9015 / 2.01 ppd since Wed Sep 12, 2007 / Ocular Digitator
owlice 8362 / 1.49 ppd since Wed Aug 02, 2004 / Guardian of the Codes
Beyond 6889 / 1.81 ppd since Tue Aug 04, 2009 / 500 Gigaderps
Orin Stepanek 5191 / 0.99 ppd since Wed Jul 27, 2005 / Plutopian
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BMAONE23 4076 / 0.76 ppd since Wed Feb 23, 2005 / Commentator Model 1.23
APOD Robot 3796 / 1.02 ppd since Thu Dec 03, 2009 / Otto Posterman
starsurfer 3769 / 1.35 ppd since Thu Mar 15, 2012 / Stellar Cartographer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry 2881 / 0.56 ppd since Fri Nov 18, 2005 / G'day G'day G'day G'day
Nitpicker 2690 / 1.20 ppd since Thu Sep 19, 2013 / Inverse Square
rstevenson 2616 / 0.66 ppd since Fri Mar 28, 2008 / Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Boomer12k 2599 / 0.57 ppd since Sat Apr 21, 2007 / :---[===]*
BDanielMayfield 2216 / 0.81 ppd since Thu Aug 02, 2012 / Don't bring me down
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MargaritaMc 1836 / 0.73 ppd since Wed Jan 09, 2013 / Look to the Evenstar
RJN 1539 / 0.27 ppd since Sat Jul 24, 2004 / Baffled Boffin
Sandgirl 1500 / 0.70 ppd since Tue Jun 25, 2013 / Captain
ta152h0 1347 / 0.28 ppd since Sun Aug 28, 2005 / Schooled
emc 1235 / 0.28 ppd since Tue Jul 17, 2007 / Equine Locutionist
JohnD 1196 / 0.22 ppd since Wed Feb 16, 2005 / Tea Time, Guv! Cheerio!
apodman 1171 / 0.31 ppd since Wed Aug 15, 2007 / Teapot Fancier (MIA)
DavidLeodis 1169 / 0.27 ppd since Wed May 01, 2006 / Perceptatron
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MarkBour 963 / 0.42 ppd since Mon Aug 26, 2013 / Subtle Signal
Ron-Astro Pharmacist 889 / 0.35 ppd since Thu Jan 03, 2013 / Resistored Fizzacist
NoelC 876 / 0.17 ppd since Sat Nov 19, 2005 / Creepy Spock
alter-ego 861 / 0.20 ppd since Sun Apr 20, 2008 / Serendipitous Sleuthhound
Nereid 832 / 0.18 ppd since Thu Sep 28, 2006 / Intrepidus Dux Emeritus
Anthony Barreiro 793 / 0.32 ppd since Wed May 11, 2011 / Turtles all the way down
Rothkko 689 / 0.24 ppd since Thu Apr 08, 2010 / Lieutenant
Moonlady 665 / 0.31 ppd since Fri Apr 13, 2012 / Selenian
saturno2 641 / 0.23 ppd since Wed Jun 29, 2011 / Commander
dougettinger 632 / 0.22 ppd since Wed Mar 17, 2010 / Curious Querier
Fred the Cat 592 / 0.49 ppd since Mon Feb 22, 2016 / Theoretic Apothekitty
Case 592 / 0.13 ppd since Sat Jun 09, 2007 / Commander
Qev 576 / 0.14 ppd since Wed Mar 08, 2006 / Ontological Cartographer
wonderboy 569 / 0.20 ppd since Sun Jan 31, 2010 / Commander
Doum 523 / 0.11 ppd since Fri Feb 18, 2005 / A personalized rank.
iamlucky13 515 / 0.12 ppd since Thu May 25, 2006 / Commander
Dr. Skeptic 507 / 0.12 ppd since Thu Jul 27, 2006 / Commander
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------