Nope. Waste of money, and reduced value missions. Rovers do better. A human mission is going to be locked down to a base, probably in a geologically boring area, and is going to spend most of its time keeping the toilets working. And all the interesting things they see are likely to be- as in this case- rocks.rstevenson wrote:One of the things I find most frustrating about seeing all these images from our amazing rovers is that there is no human there to say, "Hmmm, that looks interesting. Let's have a look." Sure, the rover team does some of that, but it's a major job to get the rover to go over there to have a look, where a human could just jog over and give it a poke, take a close-up photo and maybe a sample, and be back in 10 minutes. We need to start getting people there ASAP, trained scientist/explorers at first, of course.
For the cost of a single manned mission we could send up 100 rovers, and produce probably 1000 times the scientific knowledge.