Re: APOD: Tardigrade in Moss (2013 Mar 06)
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:00 am
Chris, the stuffed toy you posted has got eyes, which the tardigrades seem to be lacking!
Ann
Ann
APOD and General Astronomy Discussion Forum
https://asterisk.apod.com/
Ann- tardigrades have a pair of optical sense organs called eyespots, part of their ventral nervous system. Close enough for me.Ann wrote:Chris, the stuffed toy you posted has got eyes, which the tardigrades seem to be lacking!
Aye.Chris Peterson wrote:Ann- tardigrades have a pair of optical sense organs called eyespots, part of their ventral nervous system. Close enough for me.Ann wrote:Chris, the stuffed toy you posted has got eyes, which the tardigrades seem to be lacking!
From Slow Walkers:What is their known life span?
When environmental conditions start to deteriorate, tardigrades enter a latent state until conditions improve. A latent state is a state in which metabolism, growth and reproduction are reduced or cease temporarily while resistance to environmental extremes (cold, heat, drought, chemicals, ionizing radiation) increases. Tardigrades in a latent state can survive temperatures up to 272°C, high vacuums, ionizing radiation, outer space, and long periods with no oxygen. One tardigrade was revived from its latent state after 120 years! Since aging ceases in the latent state, entering a latent state can greatly increase the life span of the animal. Tardigrades have five routes which they employ to enter latency: encystment, anoxybiosis, cryobiosis, osmobiosis and anhydrobiosis.
Even more amazing is the third picture from the bottom, I think. This water bear has apparently "shriveled up" due to desiccation. But add some moisture, and hey presto, the water bear "comes alive" and becomes active again.Beyond wrote:At this url, http://ambergold.ru/news/219/367/Slow-w ... d,Blog_eng the 5-th picture down, is either a Tardigrade eating something, or sticking out a fat tounge.
Resistance was futile, eh Actually, after viewing it, IF i had it, I'd want to post it somewhere to get rid of it, in-a-hurryMargaritaMc wrote:It's life, Jim - but not as we know it...Click to play embedded YouTube video.
I'm sorry. I've resisted the temptation for over two days!
Margarita
The depths of my appalling taste has yet to be plumbed...Beyond wrote:Resistance was futile, eh Actually, after viewing it, IF i had it, I'd want to post it somewhere to get rid of it, in-a-hurryMargaritaMc wrote:
It's life, Jim - but not as we know it...
I'm sorry. I've resisted the temptation for over two days!
Margarita
haha, living in a vacation spot at the 'bottom' of the world, gives you an excuse. You've just got toooo much time on your hands But don't let that stop you from 'plumbing' the depths of your taste. Up north, we call that being zany, and as you may have already noticed, there are a few 'zany' posters that come and go around here. Makes things interestingMargaritaMc wrote:The depths of my appalling taste has yet to be plumbed...
Really cool video. Thanks for sharing.Science-Guy wrote:Amazing creatures. I recently did a timelapse video of waterbears emerging from their dormant state "tuns".
I was amazed how fast they became active. I set the time lapse camera to go for 3 hours but they were already very active at less than 20 minutes !
http://youtu.be/rE-6c45DaiI
It is a scanning electron microscope image that has had color photoshopped in to replicate the actual environment, as electron microscopes produce black-and-white images.houdini that wrote:someone at apod needs to explain the circular appendage by the mouth?
wikipedia does not show anything like that in the buccal tube area.
it looks like a computer generated image that has been photoshopped.
It was considered in great detail, and they applied NASA's standards of planetary protection, including submitting their plans to NASA for review, to ensure accidental contamination would not result. Furthermore, Phobos is an environment inhospitable to life even for tardigrades. They might survive in their dormant state for a while if something went wrong, but they'd never be able to reproduce, and even in their dormant state would eventually die.smitty wrote:Thank you for this helpful information. I continue to believe that intentionally running the risk of seeding extraterrestrial bodies with life forms from Earth is a very bad idea! I hope those in charge of future missions will reconsider.
The goal was not to crash-land. It was to soft-land, do an extensive study of Phobos, then return a soil sample to earth for study. The tardigrades were not the main mission. Just a tag-along.hotspot wrote:What is their known life span? Can they be crossbred?
And I guess another curious question could be... why exactly did Fobos-Grunt recently attempt to crash-land these Tardigrades onto the surface of Phobos? Very interesting detail really. Perhaps a better mission in the future could be to land a probe on Phobos (or Mars?) to detect if there are living, existing Tardigrades present?