Getting it there would be easy- no more difficult than any number of flyby probes we've operated in the past. And the control system would be pretty simple, as well- not what anybody would call AI, just a simple servo system. All the tug does is orient itself on one side and maintain a fixed distance by modulating its thrust. That's one thing that makes this system attractive- its extreme simplicity (which also translates to reliability).metamorphmuses wrote:Hmm, yes, you're right it could not be manned. But surely its trajectory would need to be very precise, and its alignment to the asteroid would have to be precise as well. So, it would need to be adaptive and "intelligent" in its navigation, or it would have to be monitored and remotely piloted by a crew? I admit my ignorance here. I ask myself, what would be the feedback response time necessary to make course adjustments? Because if it were not an artificially "intelligent" craft, and the course adjustments were needed on a minute-by-minute basis, then a remote crew on Earth is not feasible, due to the fact that the asteroid would probably be several light-minutes away from Earth. I'm thinking out loud here.
APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18460
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
"Me lonely, where friend?"
:---[===] *
:---[===] *
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:13 am
- Location: Oakland, CA
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
Huh, cool. I guess I imagined quite a bit more complexity than would actually be involved.Chris Peterson wrote:Getting it there would be easy- no more difficult than any number of flyby probes we've operated in the past. And the control system would be pretty simple, as well- not what anybody would call AI, just a simple servo system. All the tug does is orient itself on one side and maintain a fixed distance by modulating its thrust. That's one thing that makes this system attractive- its extreme simplicity (which also translates to reliability).
- emc
- Equine Locutionist
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:15 pm
- AKA: Bear
- Location: Ed’s World
- Contact:
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
i imagine if most of us faced oblivion we would be olivion in the johnBeyond wrote:Oh... i don't know... oblivion has it's advantages.emc wrote:I appreciate that there's a potential solution to oblivion.
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
That is so Newtonian of youemc wrote:i imagine if most of us faced oblivion we would be olivion in the johnBeyond wrote:Oh... i don't know... oblivion has it's advantages.emc wrote:I appreciate that there's a potential solution to oblivion.
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.
- emc
- Equine Locutionist
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:15 pm
- AKA: Bear
- Location: Ed’s World
- Contact:
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
it’s all thanks to a cranial lump and my shabby attire smeared with greasy fingers from reading about gravitational tractors and neufer’s long standing influence… it’s beyond reasoningBeyond wrote:That is so Newtonian of you
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
----neufer---- That splains itemc wrote:it’s all thanks to a cranial lump and my shabby attire smeared with greasy fingers from reading about gravitational tractors and neufer’s long standing influence… it’s beyond reasoningBeyond wrote:That is so Newtonian of you
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
![Yes. :yes:](./images/smilies/yes.gif)
![Laughing :lol2:](./images/smilies/asterisk_laugh.gif)
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.
Re: APOD: Gravitational Tractor (2013 Feb 21)
A really BIG unconsolidated meteorite clearly would be dangerous.TEB wrote: Only the solid ones are really dangerous.