Page 3 of 3

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:45 pm
by harry
Hello geckzilla

Is your interest in cosmology.

What is an intelligent response?

Who underwrites it?

Than why write stupid statements.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:47 pm
by geckzilla
Trust me, if I had a question, I would ask it. I don't. This is more like reading a book to me than participating in a conversation. I don't talk to books.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:08 pm
by makc
...and I stopped reading books exactly because I cant talk to them :) No, I do read if I'm sure that there is some info I am looking for, but no longer for the sake of reading itself. I can no longer enjoy it.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:03 pm
by geckzilla
I don't read either, and that was a mediocre analogy at best. Really, there are just some topics I have no input on but still like to read. Is that hard to understand?

My problem with harry is that he rarely, if ever, elucidates on anything. He acts passive aggressive rather and, if anything, obfuscates instead by being vague and condescending, acting like he knows something no one else here does but fails to impart this 'knowledge' on us with each post.

At least craterchains makes it clear that he only thinks we are stupid for not believing intelligent life makes crater chains though his posts have been reduced to a mere snap and string of capital o's and zeros lately.

Really, I can understand disagreeing with bits and pieces here and there and there really is wiggle room in almost any idea/theory/what have you but he seems to disagree with everything just because it's agreed upon by a majority like some damned hippie. Being different for the sake of being different? Take it to the art clubs. Otherwise you better be a fuckin genius with some awesome explanations that can be backed up with evidence.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:50 pm
by makc
Not hard at all, I was just thinking if books could be made more interactive somehow... and I do not mean some tree of chained videos that stream upon click here and there, but book answering a question that reader might ask about its content. This would probably require some sofisticated programming... oh, sorry for offtopic :oops:

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:34 am
by craterchains
OOOOOOOO00OO00OOO00O0O0OOooOOOOO
:wink:

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:30 am
by harry
Hello All

You said
My problem with harry is that he rarely, if ever, elucidates on anything. He acts passive aggressive rather and, if anything, obfuscates instead by being vague and condescending, acting like he knows something no one else here does but fails to impart this 'knowledge' on us with each post.
Smile,,,,,,,,,,,let me tell you.

The more I read the more I find that I know very little.

I'm very opened minded.

I have my opinion and respect others.

So tell me, What do you want me to discuss?[/quote]

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:11 pm
by orin stepanek
I'll say onething: Harry does kniow how to keep a thread going. :lol:
Orin

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:42 am
by l3p3r
It keeps going alright! Round and round the same circle.... :roll:

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:07 am
by astro_uk
Yup, makes you wonder why he doesn't get either bored or frustrated.

Perhaps he is just one of those "intelligent" codes, designed to mimic human conversations by giving a standard response to any reply.

:D

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:43 pm
by craterchains
Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet,


OOOO00OO00OO00Oo

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:51 pm
by makc
spammer spammer spammer

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:17 am
by Doum
:lol:

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:32 am
by harry
Hello All

And some say this is a Big Bang site.

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:21 am
by THX1138
:roll:

Re: What Quasars are

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:55 am
by GOD
Nereid wrote:
GOD wrote:Quasars are not what scientists guess -- monstrous black holes. They are the results of what happens afterwards -- Big Bangs. There was (and will be) more than one Big Bang. The Big Bang we theorize was merely only a local affair in our part of the universe.
Welcome to The Asterisk*, GOD! :-)

Do you have any scientific material that you'd care to share with us, concerning this idea of yours?
Not yet. However Hubble and currently unimagined tech. advances over the next ten years will provide such.