manuscript
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:53 pm
Having just seen the manuscript on the daily page of pics, and after reading a bit about it, it occurred to me that it was someones attempts to put a wool bag over regarding scientific discoveries and workable documents.
I am in no position to reliably deny authenticity, this was just an intuitive guess. It occurs that anyone who wants to record deep sky objects in an accurate manner certainly may, without the use of technology, old or new. That is what sort of formed the notion of this being a fraud, as all it takes is a pencil, paper, and time and patience.
And then again, if the stories of some of the more creative writing talents do survive for hundreds of years, what might be made of some of their maps of their created Universes? Most are not consistent with our current known space. Perhaps a bit of creative writing was going on, and not a hoax or fraud.
I am in no position to reliably deny authenticity, this was just an intuitive guess. It occurs that anyone who wants to record deep sky objects in an accurate manner certainly may, without the use of technology, old or new. That is what sort of formed the notion of this being a fraud, as all it takes is a pencil, paper, and time and patience.
And then again, if the stories of some of the more creative writing talents do survive for hundreds of years, what might be made of some of their maps of their created Universes? Most are not consistent with our current known space. Perhaps a bit of creative writing was going on, and not a hoax or fraud.