Just bear in mind that putting others down, scientists or no, serves to alienate them from your own point of view, which tends to be counter-productive.Dr. Skeptic wrote:I don't put down scientist. I do what I can to promote good science and try to eradicate bad science. I love and have great respect for the APOD site, in turn do not want it to be overrun by those using bad science to promote there own philosophical agendas. It is imortant to add accountablity for what is posted.
Black Hole Question
Re: Black Hole Question
Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
-
- Commander
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:20 pm
Thank you for your concern, I acknowledge your advice.
I find that being a bit "blunt" is an efficient manor to get a point across. A temporary bruise to an ego is a small price to pay to save years of relearning of another.
I would guess that many bloggers do not realize their responsibility in regards to what they post - my advice to all.
I find that being a bit "blunt" is an efficient manor to get a point across. A temporary bruise to an ego is a small price to pay to save years of relearning of another.
I would guess that many bloggers do not realize their responsibility in regards to what they post - my advice to all.
Speculation ≠ Science
-
- G'day G'day G'day G'day
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:04 am
- Location: Sydney Australia
Hello All
Relax and move forward, we have a nice group of people here, some know what they are saying , some want to learn what others are saying and some want to do their own thing.
We have several issues in cosmology that are impossible for them to be resolved here, because out there the scientists cannot work themseves out. Conflicting points of views always generates different forms of matter, thats brain matter.
Relax and move forward, we have a nice group of people here, some know what they are saying , some want to learn what others are saying and some want to do their own thing.
We have several issues in cosmology that are impossible for them to be resolved here, because out there the scientists cannot work themseves out. Conflicting points of views always generates different forms of matter, thats brain matter.
Harry : Smile and live another day.
Black Hole Question
Hi & thank you BMAONE23 those articles are fascinating
there seems to be a lot of scientific facts about Black Holes that await to be discovered ..but that is where the scientist & lust for knowledge & truth surely thrive
lets hope we learn a lot more in our livetimes
Linx
there seems to be a lot of scientific facts about Black Holes that await to be discovered ..but that is where the scientist & lust for knowledge & truth surely thrive
lets hope we learn a lot more in our livetimes
Linx
-
- G'day G'day G'day G'day
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:04 am
- Location: Sydney Australia
hello All
This MECO matter is the same ultra dense plasma, its not new, back in the last centry (100yrs ago) it was thought to be a neutron core. As more evidence came in line than it was a quark core and the theoretical preon matter core.
This falls in the study of plasma cosmology and the electromagnetic forces that generate the jets.
This MECO matter is the same ultra dense plasma, its not new, back in the last centry (100yrs ago) it was thought to be a neutron core. As more evidence came in line than it was a quark core and the theoretical preon matter core.
This falls in the study of plasma cosmology and the electromagnetic forces that generate the jets.
Harry : Smile and live another day.