Re: APOD: All the Water on Planet Earth (2016 Sep 11)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 11:08 am
Puts things in perspective, doesn't it?
APOD and General Astronomy Discussion Forum
https://asterisk.apod.com/
Just under 3 kilometers...or slightly less than the current average ocean depth.RocketRon wrote:
What may be more interesting to know is what average depth of water would occur everywhere if the entire surface of earth was quite flat and covered with all the water calculated here.
As a GAS, half the atmosphere (on Earth) lies below 5.5 kilometers.RocketRon wrote:
As a GAS, the atmosphere (on Earth) has more depth, considerably more....
Of course, such a thing couldn't be constructed. It's just an illustration of the temperature that would (theoretically) result given packing in a bunch of 100 watt emitters (humans) in a confined space.Nitpicker wrote:I agree on the size, but the core metabolic heat would dissipate rather quickly, as everyone was crushed and/or suffocated to death. Lovely thought.Chris Peterson wrote:All of humanity would fit in a volume of about one cubic kilometer. Smaller than a pixel in this image.ta152h0 wrote:how big would this sphere be if you take the volume of every inhabitant of the Earth and create a sphere representing this volume ?
The internal temperature from metabolic heat would be high enough to initiate thermonuclear fusion.
The usually quoted value for the volume of the biosphere is a sphere approximately 20 km in diameter.But how much volume does every living thing on Earth take up?
Your point entirely escapes me. But I do recognize that you're missing the point of this APOD. Badly.Guest wrote:It is just plain dumbed down anti-science to entertain the silly notion of the Earth's water bundled into a little ball. You may as well bundle the whole crust beyond the depth man has ever ventured and roll it into a ball, it is about as arbitrary, useful and misleading a comparison!
This concept was the starting point for a 1968 science fiction novel called Stand on Zanzibar, by John Brunner. From its Wikipedia article...BMAONE23 wrote:You could also take all the human inhabitants and relocate them to the Hawaiian islands with some room to spareta152h0 wrote:how big would this sphere be if you take the volume of every inhabitant of the Earth and create a sphere representing this volume ?
As I recall, at the end of the book the outermost people were likely to be ankle deep in the sea, an image that has stuck with me ever since.The primary engine of the novel's story is overpopulation and its projected consequences, and the title refers to an early twentieth-century claim that the world's population could fit onto the Isle of Wight – which has an area of 381 square kilometres (147 sq mi) – if they were all standing upright. Brunner remarked that the growing world population now required a larger island; the 3.5 billion people living in 1968 could stand together on the Isle of Man (area 572 square kilometres (221 sq mi)), while the 7 billion people who he (correctly) projected would be alive in 2010 would need to stand on Zanzibar (area 1,554 square kilometres (600 sq mi)). Throughout the book, the image of the entire human race standing shoulder-to-shoulder on a small island is a metaphor for a crowded world.
I think gravity did that already, about 4 billion years ago. It's what the water's sitting on.You may as well bundle the whole crust beyond the depth man has ever ventured and roll it into a ball,