Got Planets?

The cosmos at our fingertips.
User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: Got Planets?

Post by Beyond » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:31 am

Back when i used to make homemade apple pies, i used rectangular pans. I really liked the corner pieces of pie. They were so good for holding and eating with one hand.
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: Got Planets?

Post by BMAONE23 » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:33 am

rstevenson wrote:
Chris Peterson wrote:
geckzilla wrote:I actually like crunchy, crumbly cookies. I thought everyone liked them like that for a long time but then sometime in high school maybe I learned that soft was the preferred texture.
Soft generally means they were made with too much sugar. I agree, a bit more crunchy/crumbly is better.
The industry terms are "chewy" and "crunchy" -- and they are completely different beasts, made with quite a different proportion of ingredients. A soft (chewy) cookie doesn't have too much sugar in it, it has the right amount for a soft cookie. Examples of chewy cookies would be chocolate chip or molasses cookies. Examples of hard (crunchy) cookies would be ginger snaps or shortbreads.

Most of the time, if a cookie that should be chewy is hard but not crunchy, it just means the baker mixed them too much, developing too much of the gluten, or maybe they used the wrong kind of flour. But if they follow a good recipe and have some idea what they're doing, it's easy to make the different kinds consistently chewy or crunchy, as desired.

I know whereof I speak...
DonutMachine-Dec04.jpg
Rob
Such a toroid affair

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: Got Planets?

Post by geckzilla » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:43 am

This is possibly one of the most abjectly derailed threads in the history of Asterisk.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

BDanielMayfield
Don't bring me down
Posts: 2524
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:24 am
AKA: Bruce
Location: East Idaho

Re: Got Planets?

Post by BDanielMayfield » Sat Oct 04, 2014 12:22 pm

geckzilla wrote:This is possibly one of the most abjectly derailed threads in the history of Asterisk.
Quite so. It even resisted my attempt to get it back on track.

Oh well. As the Borg say, "resistance is futile".
Just as zero is not equal to infinity, everything coming from nothing is illogical.

User avatar
rstevenson
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Re: Got Planets?

Post by rstevenson » Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:34 pm

geckzilla wrote:This is possibly one of the most abjectly derailed threads in the history of Asterisk.
Er, um, no ... it's like this. We were talking about planets, and planets -- at least planets like Earth -- likely have plate techtonics, and plate techtonics can be likened to the crustiness of cookies, and like, ... um ..., yeah, like that. See?

Rob

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18596
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: Got Planets?

Post by Chris Peterson » Sat Oct 04, 2014 1:54 pm

rstevenson wrote:
geckzilla wrote:This is possibly one of the most abjectly derailed threads in the history of Asterisk.
Er, um, no ... it's like this. We were talking about planets, and planets -- at least planets like Earth -- likely have plate techtonics, and plate techtonics can be likened to the crustiness of cookies, and like, ... um ..., yeah, like that. See?
And the train wreck continues...
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: Got Planets?

Post by Beyond » Sat Oct 04, 2014 9:25 pm

Chew chew chew chew chew chew chew chew...
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: Got Planets?

Post by MargaritaMc » Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:56 am

I thought I'd put in my twopennyworth (but not about cookies, as I'm on a diet... 8-) )


First, our friend Wikipedia, on the estimate for exoplanets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet
An exoplanet or extrasolar planet is a planet that does not orbit Earth's Sun and instead orbits a different star, stellar remnant, or brown dwarf. Over 1800 exoplanets have been discovered (1822 planets in 1137 planetary systems including 467 multiple planetary systems as of 29 September 2014).[5] There are also free floating planets, not orbiting any star, which tend to be considered separately, especially if they are free floating gas giants, in which case they are often counted, like WISE 0855–0714, as low-mass brown dwarfs.[6]

The Kepler mission space telescope has also detected a few thousand[7][8] candidate planets,[9][10] of which about 11% may be false positives.[11] There is at least one planet on average per star.[3] Around 1 in 5 Sun-like stars[a] have an "Earth-sized" planet in the habitable zone,
with the nearest expected to be within 12 light-years distance from Earth.[12][13] Assuming 200 billion stars in the Milky Way,[d] that would be 11 billion potentially habitable Earths, rising to 40 billion if red dwarf stars are included.[14] The free-floating planets in the Milky Way possibly number in the trillions.[15]

Note 3:Cassan, A.; et al. (2012). "One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations". Nature 481 (7380): 167–169. arXiv:1202.0903. Bibcode:2012Natur.481..167C. doi:10.1038/nature10684. PMID 22237108


And now, the derivation of the word "planet", also from Wikipedia:

The planets in early Greek astronomy
The name "planet" comes from the Greek term πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning "wanderer", as ancient astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. Five planets can be seen with the naked eye: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Sometimes the luminaries, the Sun and Moon, are added to the list of naked eye planets to make a total of seven. :shock:



Margarita
"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
— Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

User avatar
owlice
Guardian of the Codes
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Got Planets?

Post by owlice » Sun Oct 05, 2014 4:44 pm

MargaritaMc wrote:
The planets in early Greek astronomy
The name "planet" comes from the Greek term πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning "wanderer", as ancient astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. Five Six planets can be seen with the naked eye: Earth, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Sometimes the luminaries, the Sun and Moon, are added to the list of naked eye planets to make a total of seven eight. :shock:
Margarita
Fixed it. 8-)
A closed mouth gathers no foot.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18596
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: Got Planets?

Post by Chris Peterson » Sun Oct 05, 2014 7:51 pm

owlice wrote:
MargaritaMc wrote:
The planets in early Greek astronomy
The name "planet" comes from the Greek term πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning "wanderer", as ancient astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. Five Six planets can be seen with the naked eye: Earth, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Sometimes the luminaries, the Sun and Moon, are added to the list of naked eye planets to make a total of seven eight. :shock:
Margarita
Fixed it. 8-)
Sort of. Earth wasn't considered a planet in antiquity. So if you're including everything we now treat as a planet which is visible with the naked eye, you need to include Uranus to the list.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: Got Planets?

Post by Beyond » Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:03 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:Sort of. Earth wasn't considered a planet in antiquity. So if you're including everything we now treat as a planet which is visible with the naked eye, you need to include Uranus to the list.
So depending on the alignment of the planets in the night sky that you're looking at, you may have to look behind you to see Uranus.
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
MargaritaMc
Look to the Evenstar
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm
Location: 28°16'7"N 16°36'20"W

Re: Got Planets?

Post by MargaritaMc » Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:14 pm

Chris Peterson wrote: Sort of. Earth wasn't considered a planet in antiquity. So if you're including everything we now treat as a planet which is visible with the naked eye, you need to include Uranus to the list.
My :shock: was seeing The Sun listed as a planet :!: :wink:
planet (n.) Online Etymology Dictionary
late Old English planete, from Old French planete (Modern French planète), from Late Latin planeta, from Greek planetes, from (asteres) planetai "wandering (stars)*," from planasthai "to wander," of unknown origin, possibly from PIE *pele- (2) "flat, to spread" on notion of "spread out." So called because they have apparent motion, unlike the "fixed" stars. Originally including also the moon and sun; modern scientific sense of "world that orbits a star" is from 1630s.
* So Lee Marvin was correct: he was born under "a wandering star"...
"In those rare moments of total quiet with a dark sky, I again feel the awe that struck me as a child. The feeling is utterly overwhelming as my mind races out across the stars. I feel peaceful and serene."
— Dr Debra M. Elmegreen, Fellow of the AAAS

Post Reply