Page 2 of 2

Re: APOD: The Missing Craters of Asteroid Itokawa (2014 Feb

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:29 am
by Nitpicker
BobStein-VisiBone wrote:
APOD Robot wrote:...craters might ... be filled in whenever the asteroid gets ... struck by a massive meteor.
So what you're saying is, Asteroid Itokawa might show evidence of a crater after all. One that is bigger than Asteroid Itokawa.
I don't think that's what APOD Robot meant. The massive meteor would still be smaller than the asteroid.

Re: APOD: The Missing Craters of Asteroid Itokawa (2014 Feb

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:33 am
by Chris Peterson
Nitpicker wrote:
BobStein-VisiBone wrote:
APOD Robot wrote:...craters might ... be filled in whenever the asteroid gets ... struck by a massive meteor.
So what you're saying is, Asteroid Itokawa might show evidence of a crater after all. One that is bigger than Asteroid Itokawa.
I don't think that's what APOD Robot meant. The massive meteor would still be smaller than the asteroid.
Yes, he was just playing with the idea of the crater being larger than the asteroid (i.e. all you have is unstructured rubble), not suggesting that the impactor was larger than the asteroid.

Re: APOD: The Missing Craters of Asteroid Itokawa (2014 Feb

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:02 am
by Nitpicker
Chris Peterson wrote:
Nitpicker wrote:
BobStein-VisiBone wrote:
So what you're saying is, Asteroid Itokawa might show evidence of a crater after all. One that is bigger than Asteroid Itokawa.
I don't think that's what APOD Robot meant. The massive meteor would still be smaller than the asteroid.
Yes, he was just playing with the idea of the crater being larger than the asteroid (i.e. all you have is unstructured rubble), not suggesting that the impactor was larger than the asteroid.
It might show evidence of an impact, or of being ejectum (if that really is a word), but it does not show evidence of a crater.

Re: APOD: The Missing Craters of Asteroid Itokawa (2014 Feb

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:10 am
by Chris Peterson
Nitpicker wrote: It might show evidence of an impact, or of being ejectum (if that really is a word), but it does not show evidence of a crater.
I think you're over analyzing a tongue-in-cheek comment.

Re: APOD: The Missing Craters of Asteroid Itokawa (2014 Feb

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:21 am
by Nitpicker
Actually just nitpicking.

Re: APOD: The Missing Craters of Asteroid Itokawa (2014 Feb

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:29 am
by Mark Jones
It has always seemed clear to me that Asteroid Itokawa is a great example of a mature contact binary object. Two asteroids, at one on merging orbits came together, bumped into one another, scattered loads of debris into nearby space. They "stuck" together, at first like 2 beach balls, then the ejected debris and dust settled by gravitational attraction by these bodies to cover them. These events could have taken place just in the past few hundred or thousand years and have so far avoided any collision from other significant, damaging objects. Contact Binary asteroids are relatively common in the inner solar system, accounting for at least 10 percent of all asteroids, by many reckonings.