Page 2 of 2

Re: APOD: Miass River Sunrise (2013 Mar 02)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 5:51 pm
by geckzilla
Oh damn, that's really the rock and not a sensationalized fake? Sounds like people with some authority on the matter have confirmed it.

Re: APOD: Miass River Sunrise (2013 Mar 02)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:19 pm
by Chris Peterson
geckzilla wrote:Oh damn, that's really the rock and not a sensationalized fake? Sounds like people with some authority on the matter have confirmed it.
Looks real. Still incredibly small compared with the parent mass, of course. And smaller than I'd expect to make such a big hole in the ice from simply falling through at a relatively low speed. I'd be interested in an analysis of that process. Maybe somebody could drop a rock out of a helicopter next year when the ice conditions are similar.

Re: APOD: Miass River Sunrise (2013 Mar 02)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:22 pm
by Beyond
Well, don't forget it broke into 3-pieces when they tried to lift it up to weigh it. There may very well be more of it in the lake, especially in smaller pieces.

Re: APOD: Miass River Sunrise (2013 Mar 02)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:26 pm
by geckzilla
Pretty sloppy work, that.

Re: APOD: Miass River Sunrise (2013 Mar 02)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:39 pm
by neufer
Click to play embedded YouTube video.
Chris Peterson wrote:
Looks real. Still incredibly small compared with the parent mass, of course. And smaller than I'd expect to make such a big hole in the ice from simply falling through at a relatively low speed. I'd be interested in an analysis of that process. Maybe somebody could drop a rock out of a helicopter next year when the ice conditions are similar.
A 1.5m rock too small to make a 6m hole :!: :?:

What about the splash :?:

Re: APOD: Miass River Sunrise (2013 Mar 02)

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:58 pm
by Chris Peterson
neufer wrote:A 1.5m rock too small to make a 6m hole :!: :?:

What about the splash :?:
Yes, I'd expect it to be far too small. In fact, I'd expect a 1.5 m rock to make approximately a 1.5 m hole. So this would seem to be related to the "splash", or some other radial energy transport. That's what I'd like to see examined in some detail.