An eminently reasonable philosophy. The better you understand a subject, the more qualified you are to challenge the status quo. However, in most of science, the better you understand a subject the more likely you are to see why the status quo is the strongest position, and the less likely you are to place much weight in alternatives. All very healthy.apodman wrote:I don't take the convenient way out and say current theories of gravitation are wrong because I would like to find something more convenient. I personally would want to learn more about the current understanding before proposing alternatives, lest my alternatives look lame.
Are Positrons (anti electrons) the source of Gamma rays?
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18490
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: Are Positrons (anti electrons) the source of Gamma rays?
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
-
- Science Officer
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Old Orchard Beach, Maine
Re: Are Positrons (anti electrons) the source of Gamma rays?
Hello Chris,
A very reasonable answer, and more food for thought as well.
Thank you.
A very reasonable answer, and more food for thought as well.
Thank you.
"Everything matters.....So may the facts be with you"-astrolabe