Re: Stream of Stuff
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:37 pm
You shouldn't use colloidal silver, no matter what label it's given. For any reason. Ever.
APOD and General Astronomy Discussion Forum
https://asterisk.apod.com/
Whygeckzilla wrote:You shouldn't use colloidal silver, no matter what label it's given. For any reason. Ever.
geckzilla wrote:For the same reason you shouldn't put actual excretions from a bull in your body.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/colloi ... er/AN01682
"...However, no sound scientific studies to evaluate these health claims have been published in reputable medical journals."
That reminds me of this in the "From the -Can youbelieve that!- Files" (a bunch of threads down from this one)geckzilla wrote:For the same reason you shouldn't put actual excretions from a bull in your body
geckzilla wrote:Except that no one claims castoreum is some kind of panacea.
Actually, i almost agree a 100% with you. Silver, IF one is not allergic to it --which is rare-- is perfectly safe to use topically. Silver is even used in bandages in hospitals. I found that out from a registered RN who is also a trauma nurse. She had also never heard of anyone having an allergic reaction to bandages with silver in them.geckzilla wrote:You shouldn't use colloidal silver, no matter what label it's given. For any reason. Ever.
haha, after looking up panacea and finding out it basically means "cure-all", i would have to say that anyone that claims anything but -Death- is a panacea, is nut-sogeckzilla wrote:Except that no one claims castoreum is some kind of panacea.
You've mentioned this before. Whatever positive effects you think you feel are purely placebo.Beyond wrote:I use micro-colloidal silver water (which can't be bought anywhere). I manufacture it myself with a low-voltage machine that takes 3-hours to make a quart of 10ppm micro-colloidal silver water, in which the size of the silver ranges from a fraction of a micron, down to as small as .0008 microns. Regular colloidal silver water ranges from 5 to 20 microns, or even bigger, depending on the quality of the equipment.
Even though i don't have much of a need for it, i find that when i do, it works good.
Which reminds me, i gotta make up some more.
Doctor geckzilla, I'm sure the cold germs that started to get rambunctious in my throat on occasion, if they could, would sue you for malpractice. They got to experience the "placebo" effect first hand, but alas, weren't around long enough to complain.:)))geckzilla wrote:You've mentioned this before. Whatever positive effects you think you feel are purely placebo.Beyond wrote:I use micro-colloidal silver water (which can't be bought anywhere). I manufacture it myself with a low-voltage machine that takes 3-hours to make a quart of 10ppm micro-colloidal silver water, in which the size of the silver ranges from a fraction of a micron, down to as small as .0008 microns. Regular colloidal silver water ranges from 5 to 20 microns, or even bigger, depending on the quality of the equipment.
Even though i don't have much of a need for it, i find that when i do, it works good.
Which reminds me, i gotta make up some more.
AHA Gotcha on this one. I would be able to tell the difference immediately upon tasting. The micro-silver water is only made with steam distilled water, which has a smooth taste to it. My well water doesn't have that smooth taste. You should examine more carefully the things that you are "willing" to do.geckzilla wrote:I'm not sure you understand what a placebo is. I'm willing to bet that if your throat were acting up and you gave someone else exacting instructions to make your mixture but with the catch that they randomly hand you either the real mixture as per your instructions or plain tap water that you would be unable to confirm whether you'd imbibed the colloidal silver or the plain tap water.
tsk, tsk. Such language. Of course i could tell the difference. In the case of a cold, if i felt a cold coming on, I'd take 2 oz. of micro-silver water. If there was little to no change, in two or three hours, I'd take two more ounces. That usually does it.geckzilla wrote:You're missing the point to the point of being an asshole, but fine. I'll alter my proposed experiment to you having to either drinking plain steam distilled water or drinking the steam distilled water with the colloidal silver.
Usually. That's a key word. I'd suggest you are guilty of a kind of selection bias here, amplifying the cases where you made an association with success, and ignoring the cases where you didn't.Beyond wrote:tsk, tsk. Such language. Of course i could tell the difference. In the case of a cold, if i felt a cold coming on, I'd take 2 oz. of micro-silver water. If there was little to no change, in two or three hours, I'd take two more ounces. That usually does it.
I used the word usually, because one time i didn't catch it fast enough and it took a couple of days to get rid of it. My sinus' like to drip a lot, unless the weather is really dry, so the cold was able to 'sneak up' on me. Thus the term usually was used to be technically correct.Chris Peterson wrote:Usually. That's a key word. I'd suggest you are guilty of a kind of selection bias here, amplifying the cases where you made an association with success, and ignoring the cases where you didn't.Beyond wrote:tsk, tsk. Such language. Of course i could tell the difference. In the case of a cold, if i felt a cold coming on, I'd take 2 oz. of micro-silver water. If there was little to no change, in two or three hours, I'd take two more ounces. That usually does it.
And of course, placebos work, no doubt about it. Amazingly, they even work when you know they are placebos.
Classic selection bias.Beyond wrote:I used the word usually, because one time i didn't catch it fast enough and it took a couple of days to get rid of it. My sinus' like to drip a lot, unless the weather is really dry, so the cold was able to 'sneak up' on me. Thus the term usually was used to be technically correct.
That's the opposite of a placebo.Beyond wrote:Although I've tried a few different things that were guaranteed to work, but did absolutely nothing, like a placebo.
It's not an extraordinary claim to me. And I'm not trying to prove it to you or anyone else. I'm just relating my experience that it works and it works better than anything that i have ever gotten from a doctor, which usually (there's that word again) only gave me a fuzzy feeling stomach. If that's bias... fine. It's not only a lot cheaper but works well for my needs thus far, and so i would also assume that it works well for other needs that i don't have, but others have, and they say it works well for them in their situation, which you would probably also come against, if they were to mention it to you. But it's not a problem for me, you guys are still fungeckzilla wrote:The burden of proof does not lie with me. You are the one making the extraordinary claim.
Well, I'm not sure what you mean by "classic selection bias", but seeing as how I've never had a failure in eliminating a cold with it, how could there be any "selection bias"? Normally, (another key word?) i would ascribe "classic selection bias" to being city slicker talk, but you live out in the country up on a mountain, so i suppose I'd have to refer to it as high altitude effect.:)Chris Peterson wrote:Classic selection bias.Beyond wrote:I used the word usually, because one time i didn't catch it fast enough and it took a couple of days to get rid of it. My sinus' like to drip a lot, unless the weather is really dry, so the cold was able to 'sneak up' on me. Thus the term usually was used to be technically correct.