Page 6 of 15
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:30 am
by harry
Hello All
It must be Xmas and a Happy new year as the song goes.
Orin some one told me that if matter approaches the speed of light, fusion of the matter occurs.
What do you think?
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:17 pm
by orin stepanek
harry wrote:Hello All
It must be Xmas and a Happy new year as the song goes.
Orin some one told me that if matter approaches the speed of light, fusion of the matter occurs.
What do you think?
I'm not sure Harry; I think since light itself may be a particle; does it experience fusion? Might be something to study.
Orin
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:12 pm
by orin stepanek
I found this Harry;
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/R ... ights.html
there was no reference to fusion though.
Orin
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:46 am
by harry
Hello Orin
Think about for a sec.
Just had a thought.
If matter goes at the speed of light, before it even gets there, the amount of collisions with the odd atoms would increase. Energized photons cause fission reactions breaking down the matter to protons and the resultant possible fusion.
Must try it one day.
If we cannot take matter to the mountain we will bring the mountain to the matter. By shooting high energy photons into the matter.
In stars, before a supernova, the iron is broken down by high energy photons to neutrons and to protons and to neutrons and psossibly quarks.
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:51 pm
by orin stepanek
If you are traveling in a warp bubble you wouldn't encounter these collisions as you would be carrying your own space with you. I wouldn't think it would be practical to to accelerate to light speed. Actually no one knows if either can be done. Think of this when we turn on a light source we are sending photons out at the speed of light.
When those photons hit other matter they are stopped completely unless that object is transparent or opaque.
I'll leave the atom smashing to those more qualified. It's a little too deep for me.
Orin
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:17 pm
by harry
Hello Orin
I did not know you could carry your own space.
I will learn to carry my own space.
Must tell that to my wife.
Happy New Year
Merry Xmas for those celeb today
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 5:27 am
by orin stepanek
harry wrote:Hello Orin
I did not know you could carry your own space.
I will learn to carry my own space.
Must tell that to my wife.
Happy New Year
Merry Xmas for those celeb today
I'm not sure you can! Like I said I'm not sure either can be done! I'll be long gone before a working warp drive can be built. It is nice to imagine though. Happy new year to you Harry and everybody.
Orin
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:00 am
by harry
Hello Orin
Smile,,,,,,,,,,,,,,thats not the type of space of I was talking about.
You know ,,,,,,,,,,"I need my spcae" thing
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:20 pm
by orin stepanek
harry wrote:Hello Orin
Smile,,,,,,,,,,,,,,thats not the type of space of I was talking about.
You know ,,,,,,,,,,"I need my spcae" thing
OK Harry you got me there! I think if warp drive were to come into being the biggest problem would be when stopping. So that you wouldn't stop into some place; like a sun or inside an asteroid of planet.
So navigation would be key to safety.
Orin
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:36 pm
by harry
Hello Orin
The bad thing about going at C is that it can be used as a weapon.
You can blow up a planet.
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:00 pm
by orin stepanek
harry wrote:Hello Orin
The bad thing about going at C is that it can be used as a weapon.
You can blow up a planet.
Harry how can traveling at the speed of light blow up a planet?:?
Orin
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 6:33 am
by harry
Hello Orin
What would be the mass of the object at the speed of light?
This would determine the damage.
Also if the object is travelling at the speed of light it is able to cause a probable chain reaction by breaking down matter by fission reaction and than fusion reaction.
There is a file somewhere that expalins how a planet can blow up.
If I find it I will post it.
Smile, it may not.
But! what if? Imagine the weapon at hand.
Dooms day weapon.
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:06 pm
by orin stepanek
True Harry; if the object was large enough. Be like in Star wars.
I wonder what limits light to the speed of light? There must be some limiting factor?
And can that limit be broken?
http://science.howstuffworks.com/news-item6.htm
Orin
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:00 pm
by harry
Hello orin
I read the link
Breaking the Light Speed Limit
http://science.howstuffworks.com/news-item6.htm
This sounds very interesting
reminds me of
Speed of light broken with basic lab kit
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2796
If you can slow down and bed light, you would think that we could even make it go faster.
Light Speed
If you could spin a carousel fast enough to get its rim moving at nearly the speed of light, would time stand still for people on the carousel?
http://science.howstuffworks.com/question245.htm
I do not agree with time travel.
Nice to be able, imagine the possibilties.
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:42 pm
by orin stepanek
To go back in time; wouldn't you have to literally go back in space? Think of it; we are moving through space so what happened a 100 years ago; happened where we were in space a 100 years ago. I think we would have to go back to that point in time and space which in mind is impossible.
Unless space quite expanding and started to retract.
Orin
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:15 am
by harry
hello orin
you are 100% right.
but! it is fun to imagine time travel.
Did you ever whatch the movie " Time Machine" with Rod Taylor, the old one back in 1957. Its a classic.
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:51 am
by harry
Hello Orin
Did you give this link before
What happens to a substance if its speed is more than the speed of light?
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=56
They have other interesting comments, not that I agree with them.
Its not in my nature to agree,,,,,,,,,smile.
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:38 am
by Orca
You still can't actually slow light down...you can just make it pass through substances that cause it to have long absorption/emission times. The light is still traveling 186,000 m/s in between each particle. It's the minute amount of time in the absorption/emission process that "slows it down," on average, from point a to point b.
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:34 am
by orin stepanek
Orca wrote:You still can't actually slow light down...you can just make it pass through substances that cause it to have long absorption/emission times. The light is still traveling 186,000 m/s in between each particle. It's the minute amount of time in the absorption/emission process that "slows it down," on average, from point a to point b.
You may be right Orca; but this lady; Lene Hau says you can. Under extreme conditions of course.
http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/2001 ... light.html
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:19 am
by harry
Hello All
It does not have to be extreme conditions.
But! in extreme conditions where you have degerate matter the electron shell is absorbed by the neucleus of the atom. This force is so extreme that light may not even escape.
You can slow down light in magnetic fields.
You can aslo make light go faster than the speed of light. That is what some say.
Seed of light broken with basic lab kit
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2796
Is faster-than-light propagation allowed by the laws of physics?
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/gravity/LR.asp
Has there been an experiment that measured speed faster than the speed of light in vacuum?
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/questi ... number=495
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:12 pm
by Orca
Orin, so...by super-cooling certain atoms, the absorption/emission of light is slowed down tremendously...but again, I don't see how it is "slowing light," it is just slowing the process by which light travels through a gas.
Also, the researcher uses the term "nifty" too often.
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:51 pm
by orin stepanek
Orca wrote:Orin, so...by super-cooling certain atoms, the absorption/emission of light is slowed down tremendously...but again, I don't see how it is "slowing light," it is just slowing the process by which light travels through a gas.
Also, the researcher uses the term "nifty" too often.
Orca; when light is absorbed it emits heat since light is energy. Now doesn't that stop light? If you put a light in a box; turn off the light; and open the light in a dark room; there wouldn't be any light escaping the box. Same as you shut the light off in a room; the room becomes dark; so you stop light; right? Maybe you can't slow it down but you can stop it even though you change it into a different form of energy.
Orin
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:57 pm
by orin stepanek
Orca; I'm finding all kinds of things on the Internet that some scientists say they can do with light. Here is an example.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002 ... plight.htm
I know it has Lene Hau it it again.
Orin
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:33 pm
by Orca
orin stepanek wrote:
Orca; when light is absorbed it emits heat since light is energy. Now doesn't that stop light?
Orin
Well, when a photon of light is absorbed by an atom, "heat" increases...in the atom...as it is more energetic. But when this energy is released, it is once again a photon, perhaps of a longer wavelength (ie less energy than it started with) but nonetheless a photon. That is, it's still released as EM radiation. And again, no matter how exotic the molecules in the lab are, and no matter how long it takes for the absorption/emission process to occur, at least between each atom light would still be traveling at C, methinks! Unless I am missing something, which is never very far out of the realm of possibility.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:42 am
by harry
Hello All
I understand what Orca is talking about.
The spped of light or the potential of the photon to go at the speed of light does not decrease. Once the photons go through what ever condition, it will resume back to the speed of light. At a different frequency.