protocol (APOD 14 May 2008)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
ta152h0
Schooled
Posts: 1399
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Auburn, Washington, USA

protocol (APOD 14 May 2008)

Post by ta152h0 » Thu May 15, 2008 3:45 am

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080514.html

if there is ever a war, economic or military, between the two major participants of the ISS mission, will there be continued support of the supply ships despite either numbnuts leader stupidity, no matter the political situation ?
Wolf Kotenberg

iampete
Ensign
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:36 am
Location: Southern California, USA

Post by iampete » Thu May 15, 2008 4:50 am

The problem, of course, is that war can be defined to occur when diplomacy between adversaries breaks down.

Even if there were some treaty or diplomatic protocol which covers this, such agreement probably would not be worth one heck of a lot.

Given how much of the US's military capability depends on various space assets, I would doubt that the US would consider a Russian space launch during periods of hostility to be a benign event. I expect the reverse situation to be much the same.

For economic "war", I would hope that reasonable people on both sides would realize that the ISS and support missions thereto have close to zero influence on economic competition in any near- or medium-term timeframe.

Just my $0.02

User avatar
NoelC
Creepy Spock
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:30 am
Location: South Florida, USA; I just work in (cyber)space
Contact:

Post by NoelC » Thu May 15, 2008 8:37 pm

You have just defined another very good reason not to have a war, Wolf.

-Noel

Post Reply