Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
Sudhamshu
- Ensign
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 7:14 am
- Location: Chennai, India
-
Contact:
Post
by Sudhamshu » Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:55 am
It was interesting to note that in M64's Black eye there were 2 concentric counter-rotating system of stars. One in the inner 3,000 light years and the other extending to 40,000 light years.
I wonder what happens at 3,000 light years or the horizon where the rotations of both system of stars intersect. That region must be having some amazing collision of Stars
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
. Eventually, the Black eye might move in the direction of the fastest of the 2 systems.
-
astro_uk
- Science Officer
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:59 pm
Post
by astro_uk » Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:45 am
Counter rotation is actually quite common in early type galaxies, the SAURON
http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/sauron/ team has found many such cases, though the counter rotation is usually confined to the very inner region. My understanding is that the system remains fairly stable, there would be little interaction between the two discs and the situation remains the same for a long period. The SAURON group has found cases of counter rotating cores that could be many Gyr old.
-
jimmysnyder
- Ensign
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by jimmysnyder » Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:08 am
Sudhamshu wrote: I wonder what happens at 3,000 light years or the horizon where the rotations of both system of stars intersect. That region must be having some amazing collision of Stars.
The distance between stars, when compared to the diameter of the stars is quite large. Indeed astronomical. Therefor, collisions between stars are extremely rare even during the time that galaxies are colliding. However, the gas and dust between the stars pervades all of the space between them so that when two galaxies collide, that matter, although thin, reacts violently. There might be such action occurring on the boundary between the regions, but my guess is that it has quieted down since the collision,
Making mistakes since 1950.
-
ChrisO
- Asternaut
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:49 pm
- Location: Earth
Post
by ChrisO » Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:12 pm
Hi, Thanks for nice SAURON link, that is most fascinating. It seems unimaginable about the amount of data the astronomers can get at with this project.
[bad joke-of-the-day]
So... who gives SAURON the Black Eye? Why Dr. Frodo Baggins of course!
[/bad joke-of-the-day]
-
Axel
- Ensign
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 12:41 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
Post
by Axel » Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:10 pm
I understand encounters between galaxies - even head-on collisions - involve such tenuous structures that anyone living on a planet in one of the galaxies wouldn't notice anything special was happening. But there is contact between dust and molecular clouds, fields, and so forth. So on reading about these counter-rotating disks I wondered if such a galaxy builds up a tremendous charge, like an amber (elektron) rod being rubbed with cat's fur.
-
Galvatron
- Asternaut
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:22 pm
Post
by Galvatron » Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:29 pm
Hi.
I'm new here but I was just noticing that the center dust cloud structure of the black eye galaxy looks like it's a five sided Pentagon shape. Similar in structure to the phenomenon found recently on Saturn although I think that was six sided.
Seems like these types of structures may be more common throughout the universe and rather contrary to what most would think.
Very interesting.
-
iamlucky13
- Commander
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
Post
by iamlucky13 » Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:08 pm
Axel wrote:I understand encounters between galaxies - even head-on collisions - involve such tenuous structures that anyone living on a planet in one of the galaxies wouldn't notice anything special was happening. But there is contact between dust and molecular clouds, fields, and so forth. So on reading about these counter-rotating disks I wondered if such a galaxy builds up a tremendous charge, like an amber (elektron) rod being rubbed with cat's fur.
The thing is that the electromagnetic force is many orders of magnitude more powerful than gravity. As charged particles are exchanged between gas and dust clouds by momentum interactions, the electromagnetic interaction increases, evening out the charge. So on stellar scales the universe tends to remain electrically neutral. This is just one of the many problems with the electric universe theory.
However, vigorous star formation is often a feature of highly disturbed areas like this.
"Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man." ~J. Robert Oppenheimer (speaking about Albert Einstein)
-
Sudhamshu
- Ensign
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 7:14 am
- Location: Chennai, India
-
Contact:
Post
by Sudhamshu » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:33 am
jimmysnyder wrote:
The distance between stars, when compared to the diameter of the stars is quite large. Indeed astronomical. Therefor, collisions between stars are extremely rare even during the time that galaxies are colliding.
Thanks for correcting me. I searched a little on the web to find out that Star collisions are actually very rare. I find that a bit surprising knowing Gravity is always attractive. My comment was influenced by the bright objects visible close to the centre of the eye.
-
jimmysnyder
- Ensign
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by jimmysnyder » Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:17 am
Axel wrote:I understand encounters between galaxies - even head-on collisions - involve such tenuous structures that anyone living on a planet in one of the galaxies wouldn't notice anything special was happening.
I don't know. I just found out that our galaxy is colliding with the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. I wasn't all that suprised. I thought I had noticed something special was happening.
Making mistakes since 1950.