EROS 3d Stereo (APOD 17 Feb 2007)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
ta152h0
Schooled
Posts: 1399
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Auburn, Washington, USA

EROS 3d Stereo (APOD 17 Feb 2007)

Post by ta152h0 » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:10 pm

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070217.html

Has there been anymore attempts to contact Near-Shoemaker, the lander ?
Wolf Kotenberg

User avatar
iamlucky13
Commander
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by iamlucky13 » Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:11 pm

Unless it hasn't been publicized, it doesn't look like any attempts have been made since 2003. I found an update from then on the NEAR project site. Note that at the top the article is dated Feb 23, 2001, but the probe "landed" on Feb 10, 2001 and the article explicitly says NEAR had been on the surface for 22 months when the contact attempt was made. I presume the article is misdated.

The main page also has an animated sequence of images from the descent. Pretty cool.
"Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man." ~J. Robert Oppenheimer (speaking about Albert Einstein)

philschultz
Asternaut
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:10 am
Location: Houston

Eros stereo anaglyphic

Post by philschultz » Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:45 am

For 3D views in APOD, I would like to request stereo pairs over two-color stereo anaglyphics, and I'd like to know what others think. The stereo anaglyphic red/blue pictures give some sense of the third dimension, but they are monochrome, and they never seem to look right to me through the colored glasses. They seem more appropriate for comic books than for real pictures. On the other hand, stereo pairs can be in either monochrome or color, and they can show more detail. Your visual cortex isn't always fighting the red/blue preference. Of course, unless you are nearsighted, they also require special glasses to view.

A long time ago, NASA published a wonderful book of the Mars landscape (The Martian Landscape, by the Viking Lander Imaging Team, 1978) that included 3D visuals, all in stereo pairs. If you've ever studied geology, you know that stereo images showing topography are always in stereo pairs. I've thankfully never seen geological representations of topography as red/blue anaglyphic images.

I'd like to petition the editors of APOD that all future 3D views in APOD be given as stereo pairs. Comments?
Phil in Houston

ta152h0
Schooled
Posts: 1399
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Auburn, Washington, USA

Hear

Post by ta152h0 » Wed May 07, 2008 5:15 pm

My personal curiosity just might be enough to drive to to write a letter to the above mentioned institutions..Contemporary reports indicate nothing was damaged hile settling on the planeoid. .Pass the beer :D
Wolf Kotenberg

diamondblast
Asternaut
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:12 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Hear

Post by diamondblast » Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:16 am

ta152h0 wrote:My personal curiosity just might be enough to drive to to write a letter to the above mentioned institutions..Contemporary reports indicate nothing was damaged hile settling on the planeoid. .Pass the beer :D
I actually wrote to John Hopkins University believe it or not.
It was shortly after the landing in February 2001 although my memory is hazy.
Never did hear back though it was "hand delivered" by my brother who was attending the University of Maryland at the time :) Sonofagun probably never delivered it!
I never did follow up, and now sitting here 7 years later maybe it's time.
Lance

Post Reply