APOD: Spiral Galaxy NGC 1350
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
APOD: Spiral Galaxy NGC 1350
There doesn't seem to be very much dust in this galaxy. This gives it a lot of transparency.
Orin
Orin
-
- Asternaut
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:30 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
A lot of supernova under the bridge
This galaxy is 85 million ly away.
Most of the light coming from it seems to be coming from ?billions? of blue stars.
Most blue stars don't last 85 million years.
If those three facts are correct then virtually all of the stars responsible for most of the light we are seeing in this image have already exploded as supernova.
If I am right and there are billions of blue stars involved though, wouldn't that mean on the order of 100's or thousands of supernova per year. Or are there only millions of blue stars even in such a large blue galaxy?
Puzzling and awe inspiring at the same time.
Most of the light coming from it seems to be coming from ?billions? of blue stars.
Most blue stars don't last 85 million years.
If those three facts are correct then virtually all of the stars responsible for most of the light we are seeing in this image have already exploded as supernova.
If I am right and there are billions of blue stars involved though, wouldn't that mean on the order of 100's or thousands of supernova per year. Or are there only millions of blue stars even in such a large blue galaxy?
Puzzling and awe inspiring at the same time.
-
- Asternaut
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 6:24 pm
galactic gymnist
Several galaxies seem to have arms well above or below their galatic plane. Could it be that a large collision, from the appropriate angle, could start the galaxy tumbling in addition to rotating?
It is probably that orbital kinetic energy is needed to stabiliz the effects of gravitational forces tending to pull the stars towards the gravitational center of the galaxies with central supermassive black holes. In this case, rotational orbits would be necessary for galgctic stability.
For spherical galaxies, since no large central black hole is presant, there is no apparent rotation other than orbital mass rotations like in globular clusters.
Have we been looking at galactic changes long enough to determine rotational effects in other galaxies or can we see them with enough clarity to determine this?
For spherical galaxies, since no large central black hole is presant, there is no apparent rotation other than orbital mass rotations like in globular clusters.
Have we been looking at galactic changes long enough to determine rotational effects in other galaxies or can we see them with enough clarity to determine this?
New poster - so forgive me if I break posting etiquette.
In the photograph ‘Spiral Galaxy NGC 1350’ there appears to be a filament-like object, about 1 o'clock from the galactic core, at the top of the picture.
If anyone could let me know whether this is an anomaly, or if there is some other explanation I would be very grateful.
David
In the photograph ‘Spiral Galaxy NGC 1350’ there appears to be a filament-like object, about 1 o'clock from the galactic core, at the top of the picture.
If anyone could let me know whether this is an anomaly, or if there is some other explanation I would be very grateful.
David
-
- Science Officer
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:12 am
- Location: The Enchanted Forests of N. Central USA
If I'm looking in the right place at what I think you're seeing in the area in question, are columns of dark nebula gas and dirt moving slower and congealing behind objects that are shielding the nebula “stuff” from the high-energy stellar winds. Sort of like a shadow but also contains cooler, more dense materials.
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
I have cropped down the picture to give you more of a reference point at the location of the object. But due to the resolution of this, you will have to use the original large image for a better view.
http://photos.yahoo.com/dgarnot
David
http://photos.yahoo.com/dgarnot
David
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
Last edited by makc on Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
It is pretty small in relation to the rest of the image, and possibly distant, but hard to tell given its position in the photograph.
I did initially wonder whether it was;
a) A mark on the image, but it is not uniform or coloured in such a manner to suggest this
b) Associated with the star below it, but the curvature makes me doubt this, without the interference from some other dark mass (in astronomical terms) "close by".
Hence the query.
However, the curvature might relate to the dimmer star slightly to the right of the brighter one below. Although, in truth without a finer resolution it may be very difficult to tell.
I am, of course, interested in all of your thoughts, so please keep them coming.
David
I did initially wonder whether it was;
a) A mark on the image, but it is not uniform or coloured in such a manner to suggest this
b) Associated with the star below it, but the curvature makes me doubt this, without the interference from some other dark mass (in astronomical terms) "close by".
Hence the query.
However, the curvature might relate to the dimmer star slightly to the right of the brighter one below. Although, in truth without a finer resolution it may be very difficult to tell.
I am, of course, interested in all of your thoughts, so please keep them coming.
David
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska
It may be a star; but I don't believe so. Its too fuzzy; unless a star in nova. Look at Makc's inset; it looks as though there are filaments associated around it. That makes me believe that the filament is associated with the object below it.
Orin
Orin
Here's what author sais in his e-mail:
(btw, in my image I've enchanced it even more )Dr. Henri Boffin wrote:Thank you for your interest in ESO images.
I am afraid that the feature you are discussing at such great length
is only a small hair or dust on the detector/mirror.
It appears so prominently because we have tried to enhance the
background galaxies.
- orin stepanek
- Plutopian
- Posts: 8200
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Nebraska