Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
Ann
- 4725 Å
- Posts: 13838
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am
Post
by Ann » Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:17 am
I wasn't aware that the disk surrounding the central neutron star was so relatively large. If the entire Crab Nebula is 10 light-years across, then I guess that the swirling disk must be at least 2 light-years in diameter. Halfway to Proxima Centauri!
Anyway, NASA had better make good use of the Chandra X-ray Telescope now before they retire it. It is such a shame that Chandra will be decommissioned, because the telescope has performed extremely well, has shown no great signs of aging, and is the best X-ray telescope in existence anywhere, unless I am mistaken.
Ann
Color Commentator
-
Roy
Post
by Roy » Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:11 pm
Looks like two annular rings with a jet or ejection down from the center.
Anyway, we can calculate the average expansion velocity of the nebula - given a diameter of 10 ly, radius of 5 ly, 946 years from first observed to image referenced for Hubble visible light (2000 - 1054) = 1585 kilometers per second. Enormous amount of energy released to start that off.
-
Sa Ji Tario
Post
by Sa Ji Tario » Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:43 pm
Roy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:11 pm
Looks like two annular rings with a jet or ejection down from the center.
Anyway, we can calculate the average expansion velocity of the nebula - given a diameter of 10 ly, radius of 5 ly, 946 years from first observed to image referenced for Hubble visible light (2000 - 1054) = 1585 kilometers per second. Enormous amount of energy released to start that off.
There are stars that generate winds of 2,000-3,000 k/s
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18594
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Chris Peterson » Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:49 pm
Sa Ji Tario wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:43 pm
Roy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:11 pm
Looks like two annular rings with a jet or ejection down from the center.
Anyway, we can calculate the average expansion velocity of the nebula - given a diameter of 10 ly, radius of 5 ly, 946 years from first observed to image referenced for Hubble visible light (2000 - 1054) = 1585 kilometers per second. Enormous amount of energy released to start that off.
There are stars that generate winds of 2,000-3,000 k/s
Yes, but (kinetic) energy is proportional to mass and velocity squared. The important point here is mass. The total mass that is moving here is many orders of magnitude greater than the mass of any stellar wind.
-
Bird_Man
- Ensign
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:08 pm
Post
by Bird_Man » Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:34 pm
Ann wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:17 am
Anyway, NASA had better make good use of the Chandra X-ray Telescope now before they retire it. It is such a shame that Chandra will be decommissioned, because the telescope has performed extremely well, has shown no great signs of aging, and is the best X-ray telescope in existence anywhere, unless I am mistaken.
Ann
Ann makes a good point and apparently isn't the only astronomer that thinks it's important to save the Chandra X-ray Telescope. Here is an interesting NPR article on the topic:
https://www.npr.org/2024/07/23/nx-s1-50 ... nniversary
-
johnnydeep
- Commodore
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:57 pm
Post
by johnnydeep » Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:40 pm
Bird_Man wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:34 pm
Ann wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:17 am
Anyway, NASA had better make good use of the Chandra X-ray Telescope now before they retire it. It is such a shame that Chandra will be decommissioned, because the telescope has performed extremely well, has shown no great signs of aging, and is the best X-ray telescope in existence anywhere, unless I am mistaken.
Ann
Ann makes a good point and apparently isn't the only astronomer that thinks it's important to save the Chandra X-ray Telescope. Here is an interesting NPR article on the topic:
https://www.npr.org/2024/07/23/nx-s1-50 ... nniversary
Agreed. I can't believe that such a mundane thing as a limited budget is the problem here (though, yes, even NASA has to contend with the earthly realm every now and then). You'd think that at least
ONE so-called "tech billionaire" would come to the rescue and donate funds.
--
"To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}
-
Christian G.
- Science Officer
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 10:37 pm
Post
by Christian G. » Tue Jul 23, 2024 7:32 pm
If only Lord Rosse could see modern images of the "crab" he first drew in the 19th century!
What a baffling object…
-
Avalon
Post
by Avalon » Wed Jul 24, 2024 2:13 am
What a spectacular image! I assume there is another jet shooting out on the other side of the disc? What sets that pulsar rotating so incredibly fast?
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18594
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Chris Peterson » Wed Jul 24, 2024 2:16 am
Avalon wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 2:13 am
What a spectacular image! I assume there is another jet shooting out on the other side of the disc? What sets that pulsar rotating so incredibly fast?
Conservation of angular momentum. The same thing that speeds up a figure skater when they pull in their arms.
-
AVAO
- Commander
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 12:24 pm
- AKA: multiwavelength traveller
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Post
by AVAO » Wed Jul 24, 2024 3:42 am
Judy in the NEW YORK TIMES. Cogratulations!
Out There
Watch These Supernovas Explode Across Time
For the 25th anniversary of the Chandra X-ray Observatory, NASA produced ghostly time-lapse videos of two centuries-old stellar eruptions.
Published July 12, 2024
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/12/scie ... =url-share
A time-lapse video, assembled from images collected over two decades by the Chandra X-ray Observatory, shows the Crab Nebula, a supernova explosion first observed in 1054.CreditCredit...NASA/CXC/SAO; Image Processing: NASA/CXC/SAO/
J. Schmidt, J. Major, A. Jubett, K. Arcand