APOD: Virgo Cluster Galaxies (2023 May 26)

[APOD Robot]

Virgo Cluster Galaxies

Explanation: Galaxies of the Virgo Cluster are scattered across this nearly 4 degree wide telescopic field of view. About 50 million light-years distant, the Virgo Cluster is the closest large galaxy cluster to our own local galaxy group. Prominent here are Virgo's bright elliptical galaxies Messier catalog, M87 at bottom center, and M84 and M86 (top to bottom) near top left. M84 and M86 are recognized as part of Markarian's Chain, a visually striking line-up of galaxies on the left side of this frame. Near the middle of the chain lies an intriguing interacting pair of galaxies, NGC 4438 and NGC 4435, known to some as Markarian's Eyes. Of course giant elliptical galaxy M87 dominates the Virgo cluster. It's the home of a super massive black hole, the first black hole ever imaged by planet Earth's Event Horizon Telescope.

<< Previous APOD

This Day in APOD

Next APOD >>

[Ann]

Virgo Cluster Galaxies. Image Credit & Copyright: Abdullah Alharbi

---

The most interesting aspect of today's APOD is the enormous yellow halos around the massive elliptical galaxies, M87 (bottom), M86 (elongated galaxy near top) and M84 (top). These enormous yellow halos add incredible mass to these elliptical galaxy monsters.

Bystander (the Eyes galaxies, NGC 4435 and NGC 4438). Image credit: Derek (schmeah) at Cloudy Nights.

---

NGC 4440. Image credit: SDSS.

---

Just below M86 is bystander, or the Eyes galaxies, NGC 4435 and NGC 4438. NGC 4438 has some blue stars and some star formation, which is very unusual for galaxies in the center of the Virgo Cluster.

Near center of the APOD is a cute and very elegant little barred spiral galaxy. It appears to be made up of old stars only.

Ann

[mostly cloudy]

I would have liked to explore more of Abdullah Al-Harbi‘s wonderful photographs, but a Instagram account is required.

[AVAO]

I would have liked to explore more of Abdullah Al-Harbi‘s wonderful photographs, but a Instagram account is required.

Try https://www.astrobin.com/users/Abdullah_alharbi/

[Ann]

Virgo Cluster Galaxies. Markarian's Chain is on the left. Image Credit & Copyright: Abdullah Alharbi

---

Markarian's Chain. Image credit: Joe Renzetti

In galaxy clusters, the individual galaxies tend to lose their gas and dust and spiral arms and turn into "yellow blobs" or ellipticals. In the Virgo Cluster we find three very big ellipticals, M87, M86 and M84. M87 is the biggest of them, and it is famous for its monstrous black hole!

Giant jet and enormous black hole of M87. Image credit: NASA.

---

M86 and M84 form one end of a long "chain" of galaxies, Markarian's Chain. What I find most fascinating about Markarian's Chain is a possible interaction and gas flow between NGC 4438 and M86:

Bridge of gas between M86 and NGC 4438
Credits: Tomer Tal and Jeffrey Kenney/Yale University and NOAO/AURA/NSF

There are many fascinating things to see in the picture by Tomer Tal and Jeffrey Kenney! First of all, there is an amazing bridge of gas between giant elliptical galaxy M86 and smallish distorted spiral galaxy NGC 4438. Or is that bridge for real? Some astronomers believe that this gaseous feature is merely a foreground cirrus cloud in the Milky Way. Well, maybe so, but isn't it a remarkable coincidence that the bridge appears to begin at NGC 4438, one of the few galaxies in Markarian's Chain that contains dust and gas? And isn't it remarkable that the bridge appears not just to originate at reasonably gas-rich NGC 4438 but also to flow towards the center of gravity in Markarian's Chain, huge elliptical galaxy M86?

There are more things going on near elliptical galaxy M86. Look at the outflow from NGC 4438. That thing is for real. And also look at the strange shape of galaxy NGC 4402, which is losing gas all along its dust lane as it is plunging through the intergalactic medium of the Virgo Cluster:

NGC 4402 experiencing ram pressure as it is falling through the intergalactic medium of the Virgo Cluster. Gas is escaping all along the dust lane. Credit: ESA/Hubble.

---

Gas escaping from the core of active galaxy NGC 4388. Credit: Subaru Telescope.

---

NGC 4402 and NGC 4388 are two doomed gas-losing soon to be ex-spiral galaxies. NGC 4438 is losing gas from its core. It seems all but certain that the cause of the mass loss from NGC 4388 is the antics of its massive and active black hole. However, galaxy D100 in the Coma Cluster is losing gas from its center because it is falling through the intergalactic medium of the Coma Cluster, and it has already lost all the gas in its disk:

The black hole of NGC 4388 is seen blowing a giant bubble. Credits: NASA/ESA/Jeffrey Kenney/Elizabeth Yale/Yale University

---

Spiral galaxy D100 in the Coma Cluster losing gas from its center due to ram pressure. Credit: ESA/Hubble.

---

And finally, let's look at IC 3355, a small irregular galaxy that looks intensely pink in the picture by Tomer Tal and Jeffrey Kenney:

IC 3355. Credit: Tomer Tal/Jeffrey Kenney/Yale University and NOAO/AURA/NSF

IC 3355. Credit: SDSS.

---

I can't be sure, but based on its appearance I'd say that IC 3355 could be a small galaxy being captured by the Virgo Cluster and falling through its intergalactic medium. It still retains most of its gas, but the "friction" between the intergalactic medium and its own gas probably triggers a lot of star formation.

The intergalactic medium of large galaxy clusters strips the constituent galaxies of gas. The intergalactic medium of large galaxy clusters is made of lots of scattered old stars, huge amounts of ambient hot gas and a lot of dark matter.

Old yellow stars are scattered throughout the Virgo Cluster. Credit: Chris Mihos (Case Western Reserve University)/ESO

---

The largest galaxy of the Virgo Cluster, M87, spewing hot gas (in blue) into the intergalactic medium of the Virgo Cluster. Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/CfA/W. Forman et al.; Radio: NRAO/AUI/NSF/W. Cotton; Optical: NASA/ESA/Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA), and R. Gendler

---

The intergalactic medium of a large galaxy cluster is a dangerous place! Watch out!

Ann

[AVAO]

Virgo Cluster Galaxies

Near the middle of the chain lies an intriguing interacting pair of galaxies, NGC 4438 and NGC 4435, known to some as Markarian's Eyes.

ThanX Ann - your post was faster
...so as an addition...

Active Galaxy NGC 4438: "A monstrous black hole's rude table manners include blowing huge bubbles of hot gas into space. At least, that's the gustatory practice followed by the supermassive black hole residing in the hub of the nearby galaxy NGC 4438. Known as a peculiar galaxy because of its unusual shape, NGC 4438 is in the Virgo Cluster, 50 million light-years from Earth." (Source: ESA)

Core Area with black hole in NGC 4438: It doesn't look like bubbles to me, it's like loops.

Click to view full size image

Click to view full size image

...and the gas bridge between NGC 4438 (left) and M86 (right)...

Click to view full size image

(can be seen in a composit Image of H alpha (red / NOAO/AURA/NSF) and X-ray gas (blue/violett / KIPAC).

...in a high active region.

(image collage from different sources and wavelengths)
biggg: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/521 ... de52_o.jpg

jac berne (flickr)

[johnnydeep]

I would have liked to explore more of Abdullah Al-Harbi‘s wonderful photographs, but a Instagram account is required.

Try https://www.astrobin.com/users/Abdullah_alharbi/

Wow, the full resolution version is 35 MB!

[orin stepanek]

Glad it's not my job to count them!

[Ann]

Virgo Cluster Galaxies

Near the middle of the chain lies an intriguing interacting pair of galaxies, NGC 4438 and NGC 4435, known to some as Markarian's Eyes.

ThanX Ann - your post was faster
...so as an addition...

Active Galaxy NGC 4438: "A monstrous black hole's rude table manners include blowing huge bubbles of hot gas into space. At least, that's the gustatory practice followed by the supermassive black hole residing in the hub of the nearby galaxy NGC 4438. Known as a peculiar galaxy because of its unusual shape, NGC 4438 is in the Virgo Cluster, 50 million light-years from Earth." (Source: ESA)

Click to view full size image

Click to view full size image

...and the bridge between M86 and NGC 4438
(can be seen in a composit Image the X-ray gas is visible in blue (source: KIPAC))

Click to view full size image

...image collage from different sources and wavelengths...

...in a high active area...

biggg: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/521 ... de52_o.jpg
jac berne (flickr)

Thanks AVAO, I always appreciate the pictures you post!

Your picture of the bridge between NGC 4438 and M86 shows more than mine, since your picture also includes X-rays.

And I really like your last picture! The deceptively smallish-looking object with red outflows at lower center left is of course giant elliptical galaxy M87 and the great outflows from the monstrous black hole. But I particularly like your inclusion of large but "waning" spiral galaxy M90 at top left in your image. So here is a closeup of M90:

Massive outflows of gas from M90. Credit: MegaCam at CFHT/Coelum.

Canada France Hawaii Telescope wrote:

The colour image of the galaxy NGC 4569 in the Virgo cluster, obtained with MegaCam at the CFHT. The red filaments at the right of the galaxy show the ionised gas removed by ram pressure. This is about 95% of the gas reservoir of the galaxy needed to feed the formation of new stars (image ©2015 CFHT/Coelum).

So M90 has been losing 95% of the gas needed to create new stars!!! How does that affect the colors of M90?

M90 looks completely non-blue in the picture by Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Note the blue background galaxy, IC 3583.

---

M90 in ultraviolet light by GALEX. A few blue strands can be seen, but the galaxy is mostly yellow. Note the blue background galaxy, IC 3583.

---

What about the B-V and U-B indices of M90? The B-V index is 0.720, which is quite normal for a large galaxy that is bound to contain huge numbers of old red stars. But the U-B index, 0.425, is red, and it means that M90 has formed few or no ho massive stars lately.


Let's have a look at a map of the location of Virgo Cluster galaxies. I found the map on the Wikipedia page for M88, which is why there is an arrow pointing at M88. Remember that the center of the Virgo Cluster is at M87, M86 and M84.

Location of some galaxies in the Virgo cluster. Illustration: Roberto Mura.

---

Let's have a look at some of the outliers, shall we? M64 is the Black Eye Galaxy! You will have to read the Wikipedia entry yourselves.

Another outlier is M85, a lenticular galaxy without star formation with a suppressed and not at all richly starforming spiral companion, NGC 4394.

Yes, but look at outlier M61, which is truly bursting with star formation!

M61 in ultraviolet light. Credit: GALEX.

---

M61. Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, ESO, J. Lee and the PHANGS-HST Team

---

Has the intergalactic medium robbed M81 of any of its gas? I don't think so! M61 is almost "extremely blue for a large galaxy": Its B-V is 0.510, and its U-B is —0.110.

The only large galaxy that I can think of off hand that is bluer than M61 is M101, the Pinwheel Galaxy!

And finally, I can't help myself. Do look at this brilliant picture by Mark Hanson of M90 and nearby elliptical galaxy M89:

M90 (left) and M89. Credit and copyright: Mark Hanson.

---

And if I'm not allowed to post this picture, and the picture disappears, then do go to this page to read about the picture and the galaxies!

Ann

[VictorBorun]

what puzzle me most:
1) a chain of galaxies may be a disk we see edge-on, but then Markarian's Chain is a disk at the edge of the Virgo cluster. How come?
2) foreground stars belonging to Milky Way galaxy seem to be a big problem for the image on wiki but not so for this APOD:

Click to view full size image 1 or image 2

...
How come?

[mostly cloudy]

I would have liked to explore more of Abdullah Al-Harbi‘s wonderful photographs, but a Instagram account is required.

Try https://www.astrobin.com/users/Abdullah_alharbi/

Many thanks!

[Ann]

what puzzle me most:
1) a chain of galaxies may be a disk we see edge-on, but then Markarian's Chain is a disk at the edge of the Virgo cluster. How come?
2) foreground stars belonging to Milky Way galaxy seem to be a big problem for the image on wiki but not so for this APOD:

Click to view full size image 1 or image 2

Virgo Cluster.jpgVirgo Cluster 2.jpg

...
How come?

As for the question of foreground stars, I'll pass.

But when it comes to the structure of Markarian's Chain, and the chain of galaxies lining up, I personally believe that we are seeing an effect of the cosmic web.

Matter is not distributed equally in the cosmos, but instead it "organised" into filaments and voids:

A view of the present-day cosmic web 300 million light-years across, as modeled by IllustrisTNG. Galaxies (gold) have blown off shocked gas (white).TNG COLLABORATION

---

The cosmic web of filaments and voids. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

---

The way I understand it, the cosmic filaments are quite literally "full of galaxies". Well, not full of galaxies, but galaxies tend to line up along those filaments. In reality, the filaments are elongated structures of dark matter and baryonic ("ordinary") matter in the form of gas. This is where galaxies typically form.

I think, therefore, that the galaxies of Markarian's Chain have formed along a filament of dark matter and gas.

Ann

[Chris Peterson]

But when it comes to the structure of Markarian's Chain, and the chain of galaxies lining up, I personally believe that we are seeing an effect of the cosmic web.

Matter is not distributed equally in the cosmos, but instead it "organised" into filaments and voids:

Filaments link superclusters, not the individual galaxies within galaxy clusters. The galaxies in the Virgo Cluster are gravitationally bound, which means they are in orbit around the cluster center (and in a sense around each other due to n-body perturbations). That means the chain is transient as an apparently linear structure. Like lines of stars that catch our eyes, a coincidence. (And a number of the galaxies in the chain are actually background galaxies that aren't in line with the others at all.)

[Ann]

But when it comes to the structure of Markarian's Chain, and the chain of galaxies lining up, I personally believe that we are seeing an effect of the cosmic web.

Matter is not distributed equally in the cosmos, but instead it "organised" into filaments and voids:

Filaments link superclusters, not the individual galaxies within galaxy clusters. The galaxies in the Virgo Cluster are gravitationally bound, which means they are in orbit around the cluster center (and in a sense around each other due to n-body perturbations). That means the chain is transient as an apparently linear structure. Like lines of stars that catch our eyes, a coincidence. (And a number of the galaxies in the chain are actually background galaxies that aren't in line with the others at all.)

I certainly see your point, Chris. I guess that galaxies in galaxy clusters orbit the center of mass of the cluster in a way that is at least slightly similar to how stars in rich star cluster orbit the center of the cluster:

Click to play embedded YouTube video.

Stars orbiting inside a rich star cluster.

For all of that... Some galaxy arrangements sure are suggestive.

Galaxy group NGC 4410. Credit: Mark Hanson.

---

Ann

[AVAO]

But when it comes to the structure of Markarian's Chain, and the chain of galaxies lining up, I personally believe that we are seeing an effect of the cosmic web.

Matter is not distributed equally in the cosmos, but instead it "organised" into filaments and voids:

Filaments link superclusters, not the individual galaxies within galaxy clusters. The galaxies in the Virgo Cluster are gravitationally bound, which means they are in orbit around the cluster center (and in a sense around each other due to n-body perturbations). That means the chain is transient as an apparently linear structure. Like lines of stars that catch our eyes, a coincidence. (And a number of the galaxies in the chain are actually background galaxies that aren't in line with the others at all.)

I have a different opinion. Neither chains of galaxies nor chains of stars are random, because they contradict the laws of statistical random distribution in thousands of versions.

Stars form in strands of filaments and often persist as chains of stars once the gas and dust have dissipated.


Original data source: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA20357.jpg
IC 417 jac berne (flickr)

[Chris Peterson]

But when it comes to the structure of Markarian's Chain, and the chain of galaxies lining up, I personally believe that we are seeing an effect of the cosmic web.

Matter is not distributed equally in the cosmos, but instead it "organised" into filaments and voids:

Filaments link superclusters, not the individual galaxies within galaxy clusters. The galaxies in the Virgo Cluster are gravitationally bound, which means they are in orbit around the cluster center (and in a sense around each other due to n-body perturbations). That means the chain is transient as an apparently linear structure. Like lines of stars that catch our eyes, a coincidence. (And a number of the galaxies in the chain are actually background galaxies that aren't in line with the others at all.)

Neither chains of galaxies nor chains of stars are random, because they contradict the laws of statistical random distribution in thousands of versions.

Stars form in strands of filaments and often persist as chains of stars once the gas and dust have dissipated.


Original data source: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA20357.jpg
IC 417 jac berne (flickr)

I think nearly all chains of stars are random, particularly as they almost always lie at different distances (that is, they are not linear structures at all). Of course, there may be very recently formed stars that are still related to each other, but that is rare compared with most of what we see. The "chains" I'm talking about here are the groups of a half dozen or so stars that often show up in astronomical images and our eyes detect as linear. Chains of galaxies that happen to be linear may or may not be random. But if they are inside a cluster, they are almost certainly coincidental alignments, because there is no mechanism to maintain them in a linear orientation.

[AVAO]

Filaments link superclusters, not the individual galaxies within galaxy clusters. The galaxies in the Virgo Cluster are gravitationally bound, which means they are in orbit around the cluster center (and in a sense around each other due to n-body perturbations). That means the chain is transient as an apparently linear structure. Like lines of stars that catch our eyes, a coincidence. (And a number of the galaxies in the chain are actually background galaxies that aren't in line with the others at all.)

Neither chains of galaxies nor chains of stars are random, because they contradict the laws of statistical random distribution in thousands of versions.

Stars form in strands of filaments and often persist as chains of stars once the gas and dust have dissipated.


Original data source: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA20357.jpg
IC 417 jac berne (flickr)

I think nearly all chains of stars are random, particularly as they almost always lie at different distances (that is, they are not linear structures at all). Of course, there may be very recently formed stars that are still related to each other, but that is rare compared with most of what we see. The "chains" I'm talking about here are the groups of a half dozen or so stars that often show up in astronomical images and our eyes detect as linear. Chains of galaxies that happen to be linear may or may not be random. But if they are inside a cluster, they are almost certainly coincidental alignments, because there is no mechanism to maintain them in a linear orientation.

Ok, for linear chains (stars along a STRAIGHT line), I agree.

The chains I mean are mostly curved and twisted, just like filaments. Combining different wavelengths often results in "closed" chains with similar distances between the stars. If certain members of stars in a star chain are missing in visible light, they are often found at other wavelengths such as IR or UV.

[Ann]

Neither chains of galaxies nor chains of stars are random, because they contradict the laws of statistical random distribution in thousands of versions.

Stars form in strands of filaments and often persist as chains of stars once the gas and dust have dissipated.


Original data source: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA20357.jpg
IC 417 jac berne (flickr)

I think nearly all chains of stars are random, particularly as they almost always lie at different distances (that is, they are not linear structures at all). Of course, there may be very recently formed stars that are still related to each other, but that is rare compared with most of what we see. The "chains" I'm talking about here are the groups of a half dozen or so stars that often show up in astronomical images and our eyes detect as linear. Chains of galaxies that happen to be linear may or may not be random. But if they are inside a cluster, they are almost certainly coincidental alignments, because there is no mechanism to maintain them in a linear orientation.

Ok, for linear chains I agree.

The chains I mean are mostly curved and twisted, just like filaments. Combining different wavelengths often results in closed chains with similar distances between stars, which reach their maximum brightness at different wavelengths.

As always, AVAO, I love your pictures. The portrayal of stars forming in a long string is fantastic. Please tell me though, what site of star formation is this? In other words, where are we in this picture?

I agree with you that stars do form in long dust lanes.

Ann

[VictorBorun]

But when it comes to the structure of Markarian's Chain, and the chain of galaxies lining up, I personally believe that we are seeing an effect of the cosmic web.

Matter is not distributed equally in the cosmos, but instead it "organised" into filaments and voids:

Filaments link superclusters, not the individual galaxies within galaxy clusters. The galaxies in the Virgo Cluster are gravitationally bound, which means they are in orbit around the cluster center (and in a sense around each other due to n-body perturbations). That means the chain is transient as an apparently linear structure. Like lines of stars that catch our eyes, a coincidence. (And a number of the galaxies in the chain are actually background galaxies that aren't in line with the others at all.)

I have a different opinion. Neither chains of galaxies nor chains of stars are random, because they contradict the laws of statistical random distribution in thousands of versions.

Stars form in strands of filaments and often persist as chains of stars once the gas and dust have dissipated.


Original data source: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA20357.jpg
IC 417 jac berne (flickr)

Stellar chains in Milky Way seen from Solar system are mostly statistic outliers: Big Dipper, Corona Borealis, you name it


However I agree with you on formation of a chain of lights (stars or galaxies, in all scales) is due to gravitational formation of a filament. True stellar filaments are contaminated by background and foreground stars of Mily Way though

[Chris Peterson]

However I agree with you on formation of a chain of lights (stars or galaxies, in all scales) is due to gravitational formation of a filament. True stellar filaments are contaminated by background and foreground stars of Mily Way though

Filaments are associated with dark matter. Stars do not line up along them. When we see structures formed from associated stars, they are short-lived dynamical phenomena resulting from the dynamics of star formation regions. Nor do filaments determine the orientation or movement of galaxies within clusters, because those are dominated by the gravity of the galaxies themselves as well as local dark matter halos. Filaments are structures that are seen at and above the scale of superclusters. Scale matters.

[VictorBorun]

However I agree with you on formation of a chain of lights (stars or galaxies, in all scales) is due to gravitational formation of a filament. True stellar filaments are contaminated by background and foreground stars of Mily Way though

Filaments are associated with dark matter. Stars do not line up along them. When we see structures formed from associated stars, they are short-lived dynamical phenomena resulting from the dynamics of star formation regions. Nor do filaments determine the orientation or movement of galaxies within clusters, because those are dominated by the gravity of the galaxies themselves as well as local dark matter halos. Filaments are structures that are seen at and above the scale of superclusters. Scale matters.

Scale just follows both space and time: star formation filaments are short-lived; within a 100 million years your typical open stellar cluster is already hard to trace.
That alone would not stop us from seeing some young stellar chains here and there; what does stop us is the star field being contaminated with false chains of star at different distances and of different luminosity.
The same will be true for large scale foam of filaments and voids when we are able to see well all the galaxies of high red shift: many objects at different distances will be noise drowning the filaments

[Ann]

Stellar chains in Milky Way seen from Solar system are mostly statistic outliers: Big Dipper, Corona Borealis, you name it




However I agree with you on formation of a chain of lights (stars or galaxies, in all scales) is due to gravitational formation of a filament. True stellar filaments are contaminated by background and foreground stars of Mily Way though

Five of the seven bright stars of the Big Dipper actually belong together. Only the end stars, blue Alkaid and orange Dubhe, are unrelated (and background) party crashers.

Ann

[AVAO]

As always, AVAO, I love your pictures. The portrayal of stars forming in a long string is fantastic. Please tell me though, what site of star formation is this? In other words, where are we in this picture?

Ann

ThanX Ann

...I think the situation in IR at IC 417 is very similar to the Orion Nebula...

HERSCHEL

Click to view full size image

WISE/SST

Click to view full size image

biggg: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/529 ... c2c1_o.jpg
WISE/SST

Click to view full size image

jac berne (flickr)

Click to view full size image

bigg:https://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/system/ ... 1603797871
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Megeath (University of Toledo, Ohio)

[Chris Peterson]

Five of the seven bright stars of the Big Dipper actually belong together. Only the end stars, blue Alkaid and orange Dubhe, are unrelated (and background) party crashers.

But they are still separate stars, not gravitationally bound together. They are physically near each other, and like most physically close stars in a galaxy are orbiting inside the galaxy at approximately the same speed. The pattern they create, from any viewpoint, is coincidental and transient.

[Chris Peterson]

However I agree with you on formation of a chain of lights (stars or galaxies, in all scales) is due to gravitational formation of a filament. True stellar filaments are contaminated by background and foreground stars of Mily Way though

Filaments are associated with dark matter. Stars do not line up along them. When we see structures formed from associated stars, they are short-lived dynamical phenomena resulting from the dynamics of star formation regions. Nor do filaments determine the orientation or movement of galaxies within clusters, because those are dominated by the gravity of the galaxies themselves as well as local dark matter halos. Filaments are structures that are seen at and above the scale of superclusters. Scale matters.

Scale just follows both space and time: star formation filaments are short-lived; within a 100 million years your typical open stellar cluster is already hard to trace.
That alone would not stop us from seeing some young stellar chains here and there; what does stop us is the star field being contaminated with false chains of star at different distances and of different luminosity.
The same will be true for large scale foam of filaments and voids when we are able to see well all the galaxies of high red shift: many objects at different distances will be noise drowning the filaments

My point is that they aren't "filaments" unless there's something binding them together. There is in the case of cosmological structure. There isn't in the case of stars or galaxies inside a cluster.