At the very least, I imagine it would require substantial software changes, as the mirror segments are actively driven by motors to achieve the final optical performance. Without feedback from all of the mirrors, I expect the system in its current state might not perform properly.johnnydeep wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:32 pm I was wondering about something: if either or both of the two "wings" of the main mirror failed to unfold into position, could the telescope still do some imaging and provide useful data? After all, there would still be at least 12 of the 18 total hexagonal mirror segments in place. I would think there would only be a loss of resolution and light gathering power.
APOD: JWST on the Road to L2 (2021 Dec 31)
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18459
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: APOD: JWST on the Road to L2 (2021 Dec 31)
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: APOD: JWST on the Road to L2 (2021 Dec 31)
Chris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:52 pmAt the very least, I imagine it would require substantial software changes, as the mirror segments are actively driven by motors to achieve the final optical performance. Without feedback from all of the mirrors, I expect the system in its current state might not perform properly.johnnydeep wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:32 pm
I was wondering about something: if either or both of the two "wings" of the main mirror failed to unfold into position, could the telescope still do some imaging and provide useful data? After all, there would still be at least 12 of the 18 total hexagonal mirror segments in place. I would think there would only be a loss of resolution and light gathering power.
https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/whereIsWebb.html?units=metric wrote:
The Port Primary Mirror Wing is fully deployed and latched.
Nominal Event Time: Launch + 13 days (Friday 1/7/22)
The left/port (+V2) wing of the primary mirror is fully deployed and latched.
Each wing holds three of the 18 mirror segments. This is a motor-driven deployment.
Art Neuendorffer
- johnnydeep
- Commodore
- Posts: 3079
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:57 pm
Re: APOD: JWST on the Road to L2 (2021 Dec 31)
And the starboard wing folds out tomorrow, with individual mirror segment fine positioning starting a day after that, followed by coasting to the L2 insertion burn.neufer wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 7:48 pmChris Peterson wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:52 pmAt the very least, I imagine it would require substantial software changes, as the mirror segments are actively driven by motors to achieve the final optical performance. Without feedback from all of the mirrors, I expect the system in its current state might not perform properly.johnnydeep wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:32 pm
I was wondering about something: if either or both of the two "wings" of the main mirror failed to unfold into position, could the telescope still do some imaging and provide useful data? After all, there would still be at least 12 of the 18 total hexagonal mirror segments in place. I would think there would only be a loss of resolution and light gathering power.https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/whereIsWebb.html?units=metric wrote:
The Port Primary Mirror Wing is fully deployed and latched.
Nominal Event Time: Launch + 13 days (Friday 1/7/22)
The left/port (+V2) wing of the primary mirror is fully deployed and latched.
Each wing holds three of the 18 mirror segments. This is a motor-driven deployment.
--
"To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}
"To B̬̻̋̚o̞̮̚̚l̘̲̀᷾d̫͓᷅ͩḷ̯᷁ͮȳ͙᷊͠ Go......Beyond The F͇̤i̙̖e̤̟l̡͓d͈̹s̙͚ We Know."{ʲₒʰₙNYᵈₑᵉₚ}