Science Math Notation

The cosmos at our fingertips.
User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18599
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: Science Math Notation

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:15 am

Nitpicker wrote:Are the glyph names perfectly standardised and agreed upon? I thought the glyph names themselves were overloaded.
I wouldn't say "overloaded", just that some have more than one name (like "period" and "full stop"). But while a few glyphs have more than one name, some of them have many different uses.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Nitpicker
Inverse Square
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:39 am
Location: S27 E153

Re: Science Math Notation

Post by Nitpicker » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:26 am

To correct myself, it looks like the dot-operator is defined in the set of unicode Mathematical Operators (U+2200–U+22FF) as U+22C5 (if you can find a font which supports it).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_Ma ... _Operators

(Edit: here is a list of fonts which support the dot operator: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode ... upport.htm )

Post Reply