APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5593
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by APOD Robot » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:06 am

Image At the Core of NGC 6752

Explanation: This sharp Hubble Space Telescope view looks deep into NGC 6752. Some 13,000 light-years away toward the southern constellation Pavo, the globular star cluster roams the halo of our Milky Way galaxy. Over 10 billion years old, NGC 6752 holds over 100 thousand stars in a sphere about 100 light-years in diameter, but the Hubble image frame spans the central 10 or so light-years and resolves stars near the dense cluster core. In fact the frame includes some of the cluster's blue straggler stars, stars which appear to be too young and massive to exist in a cluster whose stars are all expected to be at least twice as old as the Sun. Explorations of the NGC 6752 have also indicated that a remarkable fraction of the stars near the cluster's core, are multiple star systems, supporting arguments that star mergers and collisions in the dense stellar environment can create the cluster's blue straggler stars.

<< Previous APODDiscuss Any APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

Boomer12k
:---[===] *
Posts: 2691
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Boomer12k » Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:04 am

Oooooh! Sparkly!!!

:---[===] *

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13845
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Ann » Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:11 am

It is a sharp picture, as we expect from Hubble. No blue filter has been used, as I half-expect from ESA. The filters used were infrared, yellow-orange and yellow-green, which shouldn't be optimal if you are looking for blue stars. Of course, it could well be that many of the blue straggler stars aren't blue, but peak in the yellow-green part of the spectrum, where you would have expected them to peak in the yellow-orange part instead. Besides, it is equally possible that the search for blue stragglers wasn't a top priority here, but that the main purpose was to resolve as many little red dwarfs as possible.

Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Sandstone
Ensign
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:43 am

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Sandstone » Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:30 am

Ann wrote:The filters used were infrared, yellow-orange and yellow-green
Ann, how can you tell what filters were used? Just curious & wanting to learn.

Mark

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21592
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by bystander » Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:32 am

Young Stars at Home in an Ancient Cluster (NGC 6752)

ESA/HEIC Hubble Picture of the Week (2012 Jan 30)
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1205a/

NASA Goddard Photos and Videos on Flickr (2012 Feb 08)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/6841443637/

http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=26950
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

Baldwin504
Asternaut
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:27 am

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Baldwin504 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:30 am

If one could look into the maw of a worm hole, what would it look like?

Could it possibly look like NGC 6752?

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13845
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Ann » Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:05 am

Sandstone wrote:
Ann wrote:The filters used were infrared, yellow-orange and yellow-green
Ann, how can you tell what filters were used? Just curious & wanting to learn.

Mark
Each APOD usually contains a link called "This image" or something like that. This time there was no such link, so I tried the first link, deep into NGC 6752. That link takes you to the Hubble/ESA page where you can read about this particular image. This page also gives you facts about how, when and with what telescope the image was taken. You can see (look at the right side of the page), that three filters were used, an infrared filter centered at 814 nm, a optical filter centered at 606 nm, and another optical filter centered at 555 nm.

To me it is important to realize that 606 nm is a yellow-orange color, since 580 nm represents a very pure yellow, and longer waves means redder colors. Therefore 606 nm is a redder color than 580 nm, which is a pure yellow color. 555 nm is a yellowish green color, more like grass than traffic light green.

The picture that was taken through an infrared filter was shown as red. That is why the word infrared is shown as red on the Hubble/ESA page. The 606 nm optical filter is shown as green, meaning that the picture that was taken through the yellow-orange filter (and which detected yellow-orange light) is shown as a green image. The 555 nm optical picture is shown as blue, meaning that the picture that was taken through the yellow-green filter (and which detected yellow-green light) is shown as a blue image.

An interesting consequence of the choice of filters is that there will be very small color differences between the stars in the image. All stars in a globular cluster (except, perhaps, some young white dwarfs and some hot horizontal branch stars) can be expected to emit quite a lot of yellow-green light and quite a lot of yellow-orange light, too. Not all stars can reasonably be expected to emit a lot of infrared light, but only those stars whose spectra peak far into the infrared can be expected to emit so much more infrared than visual light that they look reddish at all through the filters that were used for this image. Also, only the stars that are considerably hotter than the Sun can be expected to to look at all bluish. All other stars can be expected to emit so much infrared, yellow-orange and yellow-green light that their apparent color will be more or less white in an image like this one.

If one of the filters had been a blue one, centered at, say, 450 nm, then most reddish stars in this globular cluster would have looked much redder than they do in this image. Most reddish stars emit a reasonable amount of yellow-green light, but they don't emit a lot of blue light at all. Therefore these red stars would only have been detected by the middle (yellow-green or yellow-orange) filter and the long-wave (red or infrared) filter. Similarly, the truly hot stars would have stood out better than they do in this image, because they would have been strongly detected by the blue filter and therefore they would have looked very noticeably bluer than the other stars in this cluster.

Ann
Last edited by Ann on Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Color Commentator

Fossilman
Asternaut
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Fossilman » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:01 pm

As a longtime viewer of APOD I sometimes see things in the images that look weird or non-random. Looking at today's image, I see strings of stars throughout the cluster. Has anyone ever commented on this or am I just having a post-60's flashback ?
Best to all, M

KEVINDWYER

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by KEVINDWYER » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:37 pm

Yes I was ging to ask the same question as Fossilman. In this photo as in many other photos of starfields there seen to be too many short strings of stars than I would expect to see in a random distribution. Is something going on here apart from my uninformed ideas about randomness?

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by orin stepanek » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:43 pm

There appears to be a lot of blue stars in this cluster! Maybe it's more the norm than not. :?
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by neufer » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:53 pm

Image
.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connect_the_dots wrote:
<<Connect the dots, also known as dot to dot or join the dots is a form of puzzle containing a sequence of numbered dots. When a line is drawn connecting the dots the outline of an object is revealed. The puzzles often contain simple line art to enhance the image created or to assist in rendering a complex section of the image. Connect the dots puzzles are generally created for children. The use of numbers can be replaced with letters or other symbols.

In adult discourse the phrase "connect the dots" can be used as a metaphor to illustrate an ability (or inability) to associate one idea with another, to find the "big picture", or salient feature, in a mass of data.

Reuven Feuerstein features the connection of dots as the first tool in his cognitive development program.>>
Art Neuendorffer

jshirey
Asternaut
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:40 am
Location: Wacousta, Michigan

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by jshirey » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:54 pm

100 thousand stars within 100 light years. Here, near Sol, it is the only star within 4.6 light years. There are 1,000 stars/1 light year there and 1 star/9 light years here.....9,000 times more stars in that region of space than ours! I wonder what the night sky would look like there......

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18599
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:13 pm

Baldwin504 wrote:If one could look into the maw of a worm hole, what would it look like?

Could it possibly look like NGC 6752?
No. I've prepared a highly accurate rendering of the view directly into a black hole:
blackhole.jpg
blackhole.jpg (3.52 KiB) Viewed 8069 times
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

Guest

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Guest » Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:23 pm

What would the night sky look like from inside that cluster????

User avatar
NoelC
Creepy Spock
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:30 am
Location: South Florida, USA; I just work in (cyber)space
Contact:

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by NoelC » Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:39 pm

Guest wrote:What would the night sky look like from inside that cluster????
I'm reminded of an old classic Asimov short story, "Nightfall" I think it was, where people evolved in a world where there is always light, and they all go mad from fear of the dark when they get an ever-so-rare simultaneous eclipse of all the suns lighting their planet.

-Noel

Flibberty Giblets

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Flibberty Giblets » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:22 pm

jshirey wrote:100 thousand stars within 100 light years. Here, near Sol, it is the only star within 4.6 light years. There are 1,000 stars/1 light year there and 1 star/9 light years here.....9,000 times more stars in that region of space than ours!
At the "dense cluster core" link http://heritage.stsci.edu/2003/21/caption.html in the image caption it says "Here, the stars are jam-packed together. The stellar density is about a million times greater than in our Sun's stellar neighborhood. The stars are only a few light-weeks apart, while the nearest star to our Sun is over four light-years away."

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Beyond » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:26 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Baldwin504 wrote:If one could look into the maw of a worm hole, what would it look like?

Could it possibly look like NGC 6752?
No. I've prepared a highly accurate rendering of the view directly into a black hole:
blackhole.jpg
Highly accurate rendering :?: Gee, i always thought of black holes as being kinda roundish. Oh well.
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18599
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:34 pm

Beyond wrote:Highly accurate rendering :?: Gee, i always thought of black holes as being kinda roundish. Oh well.
Not when you're "look[ing] into the maw" of one! <g>
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
Ann
4725 Å
Posts: 13845
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 5:33 am

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Ann » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:40 pm

Beyond wrote:
Highly accurate rendering :?: Gee, i always thought of black holes as being kinda roundish. Oh well.


Black hole here :?: :arrow:















Ann
Color Commentator

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Beyond » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:46 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Beyond wrote:Highly accurate rendering :?: Gee, i always thought of black holes as being kinda roundish. Oh well.
Not when you're "look[ing] into the maw" of one! <g>
Gads! I forgot the 'open sesame' part. So when you see them kinda roundish, you're pretty well safe. When you see them rather squarish, you're about to be recycled. :chomp:


ha-ha, i clicked the submit button and a picture of a horse popped up in my face and i said what the.... then i realized that Ann beat me to the posting line by a nose :!:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18599
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:50 pm

Ann wrote:
Beyond wrote:
Highly accurate rendering :?: Gee, i always thought of black holes as being kinda roundish. Oh well.


Black hole here :?: :arrow:















Ann
Well, that's one of them...
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

Donnageddon
Ensign
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:06 pm

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Donnageddon » Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:49 pm

What struck me in the description is that NGC 6752 is "Over 10 billion years old". That got me to asking "How old is the Milky Way?"

Wikipedia informs it is 13.2 billion years old. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way

I am so used to seeing fuzzy red blobs in deep space images of galaxies that formed not long after the Big Bang, that I never thought our own galaxy was formed only ~500 million after the creation of the universe.

But then if there are any astronomers on those far away galaxies looking at the Milky Way, they are going to see MW as it was long ago, and wonder at how old our galaxy is.

Its all relative.

Donnageddon
Ensign
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:06 pm

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Donnageddon » Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:51 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
Ann wrote:
Beyond wrote:
Highly accurate rendering :?: Gee, i always thought of black holes as being kinda roundish. Oh well.


Black hole here :?: :arrow:















Ann
Well, that's one of them...
Yes, when I think of a horse's black hole (which is not too often) I usually think of the other end.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18599
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by Chris Peterson » Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:06 pm

Donnageddon wrote:I am so used to seeing fuzzy red blobs in deep space images of galaxies that formed not long after the Big Bang, that I never thought our own galaxy was formed only ~500 million after the creation of the universe.
Probably, all galaxies formed in the first billion years or so of the Universe- although they continued to evolve long after that (and continue to do so now).
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21592
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: APOD: At the Core of NGC 6752 (2012 Feb 10)

Post by bystander » Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:14 pm

Donnageddon wrote:Yes, when I think of a horse's black hole (which is not too often) I usually think of the other end.
If there is stuff coming out of it, wouldn't that be a white hole?

And wouldn't a wormhole be a bridge between a black hole (entrance) and a white hole (exit)?
Know the quiet place within your heart and touch the rainbow of possibility; be
alive to the gentle breeze of communication, and please stop being such a jerk.
— Garrison Keillor

Post Reply