Poll: Recent Submissions #25 -- A Long Time Coming

[owlice]

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Each image is available in a larger size; please click on an image to enlarge it.

Please vote for up to THREE images you would like to know more about.

Thank you!
_____________________________________________________________________________________


<- Poll: Recent Submissions #24

Omega Centauri
http://martinsastro.net/displayimage.ph ... play_media
Copyright: Martin Meupelenberg

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



Milky Way Sky
http://www.bretwebsterimages.com/
Copyright: Bret Webster

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



M42: The Orion Nebula
Copyright: Eran Zgayer

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



Wolf Moon and the Parthenon
http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Lunar-Scene ... non-09.htm
Copyright: : Anthony Ayiomamitis

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



Near IR Image of the Outflow from a Massive YSO in IRAS 17527-2439
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~watsonv/APO ... K_2p5a.jpg
Copyright: Watson P. Varricatt, Joint Astronomy Centre, Hawaii

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



Madison Skyline and Moon
http://webpages.charter.net/darksky25/
Copyright: John Rummel

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



M77 in Cetus
http://home.comcast.net/~brucepipes/site/
Copyright: Bruce Pipes

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



Sunspot at 10 o'clock
Copyright: Peter Pick

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________


NGC 2170: Fireworks!
http://www.caelumobservatory.com/gallery/n2170.shtml
Adam Block/Mount Lemmon SkyCenter/University of Arizona

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



The Antennae Galaxies in Oil
http://thecosmosgallery.com/mypaintings ... -galaxies/
Copyright: Dacio Rivera

First seen here
__________________________________________



NGC 2070: Tarantula Nebula in Hubble Palette
http://www.astromgs.com.ar/fotos/ngc207 ... 12010.html
Copyright: Marcelo Salemme

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________



North Celestial Pole, Polaris and Surrounding Galactic Cirrus
http://deepskycolors.com/astro/2010/11/ ... NCP_3k.jpg
Copyright: Rogelio Bernal Andreo

Click to view full size image 1 or image 2

First seen here
__________________________________________


Iridescence near Sunset from the Top of the World Highway, Yukon Territory
Copyright and credit: Charles Stankievech and Sophie Springer

Click to view full size image

First seen here
__________________________________________


<- Poll: Recent Submissions #24

[Bret Webster]

I really enjoy Anthony's Parthenon shot. Seems like a lot of thoughtful pre-positioning and preparation went into it! I've always loved the Parthenon anyway. Thanks Anthony!

[bystander]

I really enjoy Anthony's Parthenon shot.

Where's the iconic ?

[Ayiomamitis]

I really enjoy Anthony's Parthenon shot. Seems like a lot of thoughtful pre-positioning and preparation went into it! I've always loved the Parthenon anyway. Thanks Anthony!

Bret,

Thanks for the kind words!

You are indeed correct with regards to the advance planning, for such a hit requires proper azimuth, altitude, distance and time of day to be possible as a single exposure.

The time of day is the most critical since an attempt too early and the immediate environment dominates the exposure, thus leading to an underexposed moon. An attempt too late and the rising full moon dominates the proper exposure and the foreground is underexposed and too dim. It took me fifteen months back in 2004-2005 to reverse engineer the proper time of day which provides balanced lighting between foreground (ex. archaeological grounds) and background (rising full moon).

More specifically, we need the Sun to be between four and six degrees below the horizon when the full moon is rising and which leads to a perfect but delicate balance in lighting between foreground and background. Furthermore, this balance lasts for approximately two to three minutes.

Once we have this factor out of the way, the next aspect involving such an attempt is the proper distance since we would like a balance in the apparent diameter of the foreground (ex. the Parthenon) and the rising full moon. The latter varies between apogee and perigee - see http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Lunar-Scene ... e-2010.htm - but we can use 30 arc-minutes as a general rule of thumb. Since we would also like a similar apparent diameter for the foreground (ex. the Parthenon), we use basic trigonometry to determine the (shooting) distance which will yield the Parthenon as a 30 arc-minute object in our field of view based on its physical size.

Now that we have the proper (shooting) distance, all that is left is to identify a location with our desired distance and which matches the azimuth of the rising full moon and for this location to also provide a clear view of our target (ex. the Parthenon). Once this has been identified, the final variable in the analysis is the altitude of our target and which generally is around two degrees.

Combine all of the above factors simultaneously and you have the proper conditions for a SINGLE exposure involving the rising full moon and your foreground of interest.

I have many examples involving such "conjunctions" on my website at http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Landscape.htm . It is a real adrenaline rush planning such projects as well as seeing them materialize through the camera's viewfinder.

I should mention that the desired shooting distances can easily range between 2000 and 6000 meters and which means we have absolutely NO room for error. If we are in error by, for example, 15 arc-minutes (half the width of the full moon), the amount of distance to be covered laterally in order to correct for this deviation is so great (from 2000-6000 meter distances) that one does NOT have sufficient time to run with the equipment, reset, recenter the field of view, refocus and start shooting since the moon will have been rising while you (or I) have been running a few hundred meters to correct the error in our shooting position.

Anyway, you now have some insights as to what is required into the execution of such photos and which I pursue every month with the rising full moon .... weather permitting as always!

Anthony.

[Ayiomamitis]

I really enjoy Anthony's Parthenon shot.

Where's the iconic ?

Do you mean the one at http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Lunar-Scenes-Sounion-01.htm and/or http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Lunar-Scenes-Sounion-04.htm and/or http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Lunar-Scenes-Sounion-08.htm and/or http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Solar-Scenes-Sounion-03.htm ?

One would have to drive 60-90 minutes south of the Parthenon and to the archaeological grounds at Sounion.

Anthony.

[geckzilla]

Anthony, if the is ever removed, you'll have to inform us. Many of us are quite attached to it and would mourn its passing as any human. I think bystander panicked when he saw the construction and lack of tree and thought maybe the worst had happened without realizing it was a different site.