APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Comments and questions about the APOD on the main view screen.
Post Reply
User avatar
APOD Robot
Otto Posterman
Posts: 5589
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:27 am
Contact:

APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by APOD Robot » Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:06 am

Image NGC 3521 Close Up

Explanation: Gorgeous spiral galaxy NGC 3521 is a mere 35 million light-years distant, toward the constellation Leo. Spanning some 50,000 light-years, its central region is shown in this dramatic image, constructed from data drawn from the Hubble Legacy Archive. The close-up view highlights this galaxy's characteristic multiple, patchy, irregular spiral arms laced with dust and clusters of young, blue stars. In constrast, many other spirals exhibit grand, sweeping arms. A relatively bright galaxy in planet Earth's sky, NGC 3521 is easily visible in small telescopes, but often overlooked by amateur imagers in favor of other Leo spiral galaxies, like M66 and M65.

<< Previous APODDiscuss Any APOD Next APOD >>
[/b]

User avatar
mexhunter
Science Officer
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:41 pm
AKA: César Cantú
Location: Monterrey, Mexico.
Contact:

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by mexhunter » Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:08 am

Stunning image and excellent prosessing of Robert Gendler.
Greetings
César
I come to learn and to have fun.

John Hamilton

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by John Hamilton » Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:42 pm

Your APOD for 1/13/11 depicted and listed NGC3521 as a "mear" 35 million light years away. Thought your readers would like to know that traveling as fast as we could in available rocketry, it would take us 560,000 years to arrive there from Earth :shock: . That is not mear, but a much larger distance.

User avatar
Beyond
500 Gigaderps
Posts: 6889
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:09 am
Location: BEYONDER LAND

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by Beyond » Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:06 pm

On a Galatic scale, 35 million light years is a piddleing amount. Why It's just a hop-skip and a jump away :!:
To find the Truth, you must go Beyond.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by neufer » Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:08 pm

John Hamilton wrote:
Your APOD for 1/13/11 depicted and listed NGC3521 as a "mear" 35 million light years away. Thought your readers would like to know that traveling as fast as we could in available rocketry, it would take us 560,000 years to arrive there from Earth :shock: . That is not mear, but a much larger distance.
"Mear" : "to piss" in Spanish (from the vulgar Latin meiare, from Latin meiō)
http://asterisk.apod.com/vie ... 14#p132914
beyond wrote:
On a Galatic scale, 35 million light years is a piddleing amount.

Why It's just a hop-skip and a jump away :!:
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
orin stepanek
Plutopian
Posts: 8200
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by orin stepanek » Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:01 pm

Wow! To me it looks like a lot of star making dust in this galaxy! :)
Orin

Smile today; tomorrow's another day!

richard schumacher
Ensign
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:50 pm

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by richard schumacher » Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:29 pm

Which edge of that galaxy is nearer us? From the way light reflects and is scattered I think the upper edge is nearer. It would be interesting to have such details provided for as many APODs as possible, BTW.

D'ohh!! Five seconds later I realize that those dark areas are shadows, so the *lower* edge is nearer.

Guest

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by Guest » Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:51 pm

I am wondering, when the distance is listed, like 35 million miles, is that where the projected location of the galaxy is or where it was when the light started to make its way to us?

User avatar
NoelC
Creepy Spock
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:30 am
Location: South Florida, USA; I just work in (cyber)space
Contact:

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by NoelC » Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:37 pm

Given that we haven't found a way to break through the limits of relativity, it's right where it is in all ways that matter.

For a long time I tended to imagine that there's a "right now" that somehow transcends relativity, so that I could imagine where that galaxy is "right now" (opposed to where we see it). I've come very slowly to think that there really isn't a use for such a concept, unless we leave the dimensions of this universe entirely behind...

What if, for example, we could somehow learn (but, you see, we CAN'T) that a star had exploded (was going to explode?) and was (would be) sending a gamma ray burst in our direction. Might we build a space probe that would go out far enough to erect a shield to "shade" the Earth?

And in another random thought... if someone is standing across the room from us, we can see them and they can see us, right now (whatever that means). Not so (beyond the obvious reasons) with someone light-years away. We are essentially looking through a cosmic one-way glass, it seems. We may be looking at one another, but neither can say what the other will do until the crossing is made at the speed of light.

Inasmuch as it's hard to talk to someone on a satellite link with a 1 second delay, imagine the difficulty in talking to people we might send to Mars (okay, not THAT hard to imagine, it's been shown in Sci Fi films such as Red Planet). Basically, at some point you're on your own and you just can't make a call and must use eMail.

The distance where "you're on your own" may be a few yards for physical things, and it may be a few million miles for information.

Is this proof that our imaginations, which seem unbounded by these mere laws of physics, live outside the physical reality of our universe? Food for thought. Yesterday. :)

-Noel

Spaquarain

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by Spaquarain » Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:43 pm

So, so cool. Great photo. But, if the center of all galaxies is a black hole-why is it yellow? I know this question is VERY amaturish.

User avatar
BMAONE23
Commentator Model 1.23
Posts: 4076
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by BMAONE23 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:13 pm

John Hamilton wrote:Your APOD for 1/13/11 depicted and listed NGC3521 as a "mear" 35 million light years away. Thought your readers would like to know that traveling as fast as we could in available rocketry, it would take us 560,000 years to arrive there from Earth :shock: . That is not mear, but a much larger distance.
Sorry John,
You are just a little off there
Light travels at 186,000 miles per second
60sec X 60min X 24hrs X 365 days = 1 year X 186,000 =
1,818,371,625,696,000,000 or roughly 1.818 Quintillion miles in a light year
Then by 35 million
63,643,006,899,360,000,000,000,000 or roughly 63.646 Septillion miles
Our fastest probe is traveling at 40,850 mph X 24hrs X 365 days
It covers 357,846,000 miles per year
At that rate, it would take
177,850,267,711,138,310.89 roughly 177.85 Quadrillion years to reach it.

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18594
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by Chris Peterson » Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:33 pm

Spaquarain wrote:So, so cool. Great photo. But, if the center of all galaxies is a black hole-why is it yellow? I know this question is VERY amaturish.
Because the black hole's apparent size is much, much smaller than even a single pixel in the image. Way too small to be visible.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
NoelC
Creepy Spock
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:30 am
Location: South Florida, USA; I just work in (cyber)space
Contact:

Re: APOD: NGC 3521 Close Up (2011 Jan 13)

Post by NoelC » Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:01 am

Chris Peterson wrote:Way too small to be visible.
Do you mean "way too small to be invisible"? Er... "to be conspicuously absent"... Er... :P

The explanation I've heard for galactic centers being yellowish is that they contain older stars, as well as dust.

I've always wondered whether perhaps the light doesn't lose some energy as it leaves the gravity well, though.

-Noel

Post Reply