A new study finds the online, user-generated encyclopedia is more accurate than some previous reports have suggested. But boy, is it boring.
Researchers found that cancer information on Wikipedia was similar in accuracy and depth to the information on a professionally peer-reviewed, patient-oriented cancer web site, the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query (PDQ). But the latter was written in plainer English.
LiveScience: Wikipedia Pretty Accurate, But Hard to Read
LiveScience: Wikipedia Pretty Accurate, But Hard to Read
http://www.livescience.com/technology/W ... 00601.html
- wonderboy
- Commander
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:57 am
- AKA: Paul
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Re: LiveScience: Wikipedia Pretty Accurate, But Hard to Read
I remember I got told off by wikipedia for changing random enteries so they read wrong. It was funny right up until they warned me they had my IP and would inform my employers of what I was doing whilst at work
Nearly messed my pants, I still wanna be able to do it though but now I can't because they removed the tool.
Paul.
Nearly messed my pants, I still wanna be able to do it though but now I can't because they removed the tool.
Paul.
"I'm so fast that last night I turned off the light switch in my hotel room and was in bed before the room was dark" Muhammad Ali, faster than the speed of light?