7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Off topic discourse and banter encouraged.
Post Reply
User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by neufer » Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:33 am

Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
geckzilla
Ocular Digitator
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by geckzilla » Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:51 pm

Man, just to reinforce the fact that climate change terribly misunderstood, there's a bunch of people who think global warming is to blame for this quake. Whiskey tango foxtrot, over.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.

User avatar
neufer
Vacationer at Tralfamadore
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: 7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by neufer » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:35 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caribbean_Plate wrote:
<<There are two contending theories as to the origin of the Caribbean Plate.

Image

1) One holds that it is a large igneous province that formed in the Pacific Ocean tens of millions of years ago. As the Atlantic ocean widened, North America and South America were pushed westward, separated for a time by oceanic crust. The Pacific Ocean floor subducted under this oceanic crust between the continents. The Caribbean Plate drifted into the same area, but as it was less dense (although thicker) than the surrounding oceanic crust, it did not subduct, but rather overrode the ocean floor, continuing to move eastward relative to North America and South America. With the formation of the Isthmus of Panama 3 million years ago, it ultimately lost its connection to the Pacific.

2) A more recent theory asserts that the Caribbean Plate came into being from an Atlantic hotspot which no longer exists. This theory points to evidence of the absolute motion of the Caribbean Plate which indicates that it moves westward, not east, and that its apparent eastward motion is only relative to the motions of the North American Plate and the South American Plate.>>
Art Neuendorffer

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21592
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

NSF: Learning from Haiti

Post by bystander » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:23 pm


User avatar
wonderboy
Commander
Posts: 570
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:57 am
AKA: Paul
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: 7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by wonderboy » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:37 pm

Now I read somewhere that as the ice caps melt and release all the meltwater, there is an undeniable release of pressure on the earths crust. this would allow for more freedom of movement. So if the melting of the ice caps is caused by global warming, and the freedom of the plates to move more freely is caused by the melting of the ice caps due to global warming, then there is a link to global warming which could account for the recent movement in plate tectonics causing high magnitude quakes in haiti and china.

Could this not account for the volcano in iceland, maybe a tectonic shift allowed for this 200 year old dormant volcano to spew its load all over iceland. Just a thought. But I did read a fact somewhere about the meltwater thingamajig above.

Paul.
"I'm so fast that last night I turned off the light switch in my hotel room and was in bed before the room was dark" Muhammad Ali, faster than the speed of light?

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21592
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: 7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by bystander » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:53 pm

wonderboy wrote:Now I read somewhere
'Tiny' climate changes may trigger quakes
Climate change could spark more "hazardous" geological events such as volcanoes, earthquakes and landslides, scientists warned today.

In papers published by the Royal Society, researchers warned that melting ice, sea level rises and even increasingly heavy storms and rainfall - predicted consequences of rising temperatures - could affect the Earth's crust.

Even small changes in the environment could trigger activity such as earthquakes and tsunamis.

And some evidence suggests the consequences of climate change were already having an impact on geological activity in places such as Alaska

User avatar
Chris Peterson
Abominable Snowman
Posts: 18594
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re: 7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by Chris Peterson » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:17 pm

wonderboy wrote:Could this not account for the volcano in iceland, maybe a tectonic shift allowed for this 200 year old dormant volcano to spew its load all over iceland. Just a thought. But I did read a fact somewhere about the meltwater thingamajig above.
I think the connection between the loss of ice sheets and altered tectonic activity is reasonably well established. In the long term, global warming may well alter earthquake patterns. Indeed, the Earth is still rebounding from the loss of ice after the most recent glacial period, and that must certainly be affecting earthquakes and volcanic activity. But I don't think there has been enough ice loss from the anthropogenic warming of the last 150 years to have a significant tectonic impact- yet.
Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com

User avatar
bystander
Apathetic Retiree
Posts: 21592
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: 7.0 Quake Near Port Au Prince

Post by bystander » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:20 pm

Chris Peterson wrote:
wonderboy wrote:Could this not account for the volcano in iceland, maybe a tectonic shift allowed for this 200 year old dormant volcano to spew its load all over iceland. Just a thought. But I did read a fact somewhere about the meltwater thingamajig above.
I think the connection between the loss of ice sheets and altered tectonic activity is reasonably well established. In the long term, global warming may well alter earthquake patterns. Indeed, the Earth is still rebounding from the loss of ice after the most recent glacial period, and that must certainly be affecting earthquakes and volcanic activity. But I don't think there has been enough ice loss from the anthropogenic warming of the last 150 years to have a significant tectonic impact- yet.
http://asterisk.apod.com/vie ... 81#p119725

Post Reply