gravitational slingshot
gravitational slingshot
I was reading somewhere that Milky Way A* object threw some star outwards at more than galaxy escape velocity. So I was thinking, if it can do that to objects as large as stars, how much more speed can small spaceship gain by passing close to such an object? Assuming it does not get close enough to be torn apart by tidal forces.
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18601
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: gravitational slingshot
Escape velocity is the same for any object, regardless of mass. And a low mass object doesn't get a bigger boost in a slingshot maneuver than a high mass object. The only major difference is that a physically small body can get closer to the slingshot body than a large one, which does allow for a greater effect.makc wrote:I was reading somewhere that Milky Way A* object threw some star outwards at more than galaxy escape velocity. So I was thinking, if it can do that to objects as large as stars, how much more speed can small spaceship gain by passing close to such an object? Assuming it does not get close enough to be torn apart by tidal forces.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
Re: gravitational slingshot
According to wiki it is even less than that, and is defined by relative velocity of heavy object:
In case of Sun and A* this would be our radial velocity in the galaxy, which I assume is pretty small (if we move along anything close to circle)
On the other side, there are some pretty fast stars orbiting A*, arent there, so we could definitely use those to give us some boost Unfortunately, we don't live close enough, so this trick is up to near-galaxy-center aliens.
So, for this plan to work for _us_, we need some binary neutron star nearby. Any candidates?
In case of Sun and A* this would be our radial velocity in the galaxy, which I assume is pretty small (if we move along anything close to circle)
On the other side, there are some pretty fast stars orbiting A*, arent there, so we could definitely use those to give us some boost Unfortunately, we don't live close enough, so this trick is up to near-galaxy-center aliens.
So, for this plan to work for _us_, we need some binary neutron star nearby. Any candidates?
- geckzilla
- Ocular Digitator
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Modesto, CA
- Contact:
Re: gravitational slingshot
Man, what is A*? It's impossible to look up such a name because * isn't counted as part of the keyword. And the Wikipedia article has nothing to do with astronomy.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.
-
- 2+2=5
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:39 pm
- AKA: Swainy
- Location: The Earth, The Milky Way, Great Britain
Re: gravitational slingshot
Maybe, look inside the numbers?geckzilla wrote:Man, what is A*? It's impossible to look up such a name because * isn't counted as part of the keyword. And the Wikipedia article has nothing to do with astronomy.
1 Getting to close to the 4 m/s/m black hole is not wise? The object in question was a very solid object.
2 How did voyager boost its speed? http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/
3 If gravity did boost its speed, on the other side, why did it not slow it down?
4 How do you use this >>> http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Escape_velocity To gain speed?
Last edited by The Code on Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Always trying to find the answers
- geckzilla
- Ocular Digitator
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Modesto, CA
- Contact:
Re: gravitational slingshot
Mark, I just wanted to let you know that you made things even more confusing for me. Maybe you should not have responded if you did not want to explain it more clearly to me.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.
Re: gravitational slingshot
Sagittarius A*geckzilla wrote:Man, what is A*?
- geckzilla
- Ocular Digitator
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Modesto, CA
- Contact:
Re: gravitational slingshot
Thanks, bystander. By the way, how many *-named things are there out there? I can't recall seeing any others but sometimes my memory fails me. Why is it named with a *?
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.
-
- 2+2=5
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:39 pm
- AKA: Swainy
- Location: The Earth, The Milky Way, Great Britain
Re: gravitational slingshot
geckzilla wrote:Thanks, bystander. By the way, how many *-named things are there out there? I can't recall seeing any others but sometimes my memory fails me. Why is it named with a *?
Because there is so much to name? http://www.ianridpath.com/starnames.htm
Just a few.
Always trying to find the answers
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18601
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: gravitational slingshot
Uh... you do know that the asterisks in that list are not part of the star names? They just mean that those stars are found in the Nautical Almanac.mark swain wrote:Because there is so much to name? http://www.ianridpath.com/starnames.htmgeckzilla wrote:Thanks, bystander. By the way, how many *-named things are there out there? I can't recall seeing any others but sometimes my memory fails me. Why is it named with a *?
Just a few.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
-
- 2+2=5
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:39 pm
- AKA: Swainy
- Location: The Earth, The Milky Way, Great Britain
Re: gravitational slingshot
Come on, we all make mistakes don't we....
There ya go, ..... sorry guys.
There ya go, ..... sorry guys.
Always trying to find the answers