I did read that to some extent, and there is pretty much same situaton (ungrounded assumptions in every 2nd paragraph). Here, we cant even deal with one simple formula you claim to be valid, so how could you seriously want us to discuss each and every statement from myriads you wrote there? Under current rate of meaningful responses on your part, It would take many months if not yearsJimJast wrote:I think that it will be more efficient if you just read from the internet my popular "Gravitation for everyone" ("Explanation for high school students and astrophysicists why thing fall").
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
It seems to me that you think, if your work is titled "gravity for everyone, explanation for high-school students", it is perfectly ok to use bad math, because noone notices and noone cares how do you get to your results. Unfortunately, we do, so I have diffent suggestion here for you. Why dont you write "gravitation for mainstream scientists, explanation for clean math fans", where you would do your best to use bullet-proof math method to derive your results, and THEN put that up for discussion?