Oooooooooooh! Lovely! APoD 11/1/9.
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 5:11 pm
Oooooooooooh! Lovely! APoD 11/1/9.
I want to *go* there!
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
or
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html if you're reading this
after 11/1/9.
Someone should print this off as a poster, with a large, red arrow pointing
to the Pale Blue Dot and the message "You are here."
Chances are, every single human being who will ever live from now until
the species goes extinct will be well within one pixel of that dot.
But I really, really want to see this view with my own eyes.
And the Martian sunset, our galaxy from above, a close binary star system
with stars of different colours...
... I need a Starship.
SDM.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
or
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html if you're reading this
after 11/1/9.
Someone should print this off as a poster, with a large, red arrow pointing
to the Pale Blue Dot and the message "You are here."
Chances are, every single human being who will ever live from now until
the species goes extinct will be well within one pixel of that dot.
But I really, really want to see this view with my own eyes.
And the Martian sunset, our galaxy from above, a close binary star system
with stars of different colours...
... I need a Starship.
SDM.
In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
What are the bright radial "rays" that appear outside the rings? Artifacts?
Re: In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
The large, diffuse, and dim ones going up and down on the picture? I was wondering about that, too.
- hughhyatt
- Asternaut
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:37 pm
- Location: Upper Holland, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
Also, why is the inner edge of the inner ring that's in Saturn's shadow offset from the one that's not in shadow? Surely, we're not seeing more through light that's reflected off the rings, then off the planet and finally back through the rings than we're seeing through scattered direct sunlight. BTW, the same thing appears to be true of the outermost edge that's in Saturn's shadow as well.
O Star-eyed Science! hast thou wandered there, To waft us home the message of despair? — Thomas Campbell
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
The backside of Saturn is illuminated by:hughhyatt wrote:Also, why is the inner edge of the inner ring that's in Saturn's shadow offset from the one that's not in shadow? Surely, we're not seeing more through light that's reflected off the rings, then off the planet and finally back through the rings than we're seeing through scattered direct sunlight. BTW, the same thing appears to be true of the outermost edge that's in Saturn's shadow as well.
1) back scattered sunlight off the sunlit side of the rings and
2) side scattered sunlight off the night side of the rings.
Neither ring illumination gets to Saturn's poles which don't see the rings.
Neither ring illumination gets to Saturn's equator hardly sees the rings.
However, the ring illumination does gradually gets brighter as one moves away from the Saturn's equator into the temperate zones particularly in the Southern Hemisphere which receives ring back scattered sunlight.
The "inner edge of the inner ring that's in Saturn's shadow " is actually the surface of Saturn itself demonstrating the contrast between the poorly lit Northern Hemisphere and the well lit Southern Hemisphere. The two dark bands on Saturn's Southern Hemisphere are simply the thick B & A ring bands preventing us from a relatively clear view of Saturn's entire back side. These thick B & A ring bands are also dark in the space view because they are truly (multiply scattered) opaque bands. The fact that the bright non-opaque C & D bands in the space view are approximately as bright as Saturn's back lit Southern Hemisphere (as seen through the C & D bands) is simply coincidence and the two (space & Saturn views) should not be confused with each other.
Last edited by neufer on Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Art Neuendorffer
- hughhyatt
- Asternaut
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:37 pm
- Location: Upper Holland, PA, USA
- Contact:
Re: In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
A very cogent explanation, Art, and one that would probably never have occurred to me. Thanks!
O Star-eyed Science! hast thou wandered there, To waft us home the message of despair? — Thomas Campbell
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
Check out: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap071023.htmlhughhyatt wrote:A very cogent explanation, Art, and one that would probably never have occurred to me. Thanks!
1) opaque B & A ring band shadows on the sunlit side of Saturn as well as
2) Saturn's well illuminated backlit Southern Hemisphere.
Now combine the two in your mind for today's Saturn Southern Hemisphere:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html
Art Neuendorffer
Pale Blue Dot (Earth)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html ...
B-R=1
(R=159 G=149 B=160)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (shrunk to my screen) ...
B-R=3
(R=204 G=193 B=207)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (full size) ...
B-R=3
(R=195 G=184 B=198)
Pale blue indeed. Though the "white" rings provide a slightly red "bias" to the eye, rendering the apparent hue a few notches more bluish. Imagine the paleness of the blue if the colors hadn't been "exaggerated".
---
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from the Voyager 1 picture at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
B-R=9
(R=149 G=179 B=158)
Not quite so pale, but the winner is actually green.
---
For anyone who arrived on this planet recently: R is red, G is green, and B is blue. Although ...
There is a popular belief that the R, G, and B in the call letters of TV station WRGB serving New York's capital distict (Albany, Schenectady, Troy) refer to the colors of color television. Not so, according to ...
Walter Ransom Gail Baker (1892-1960)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html ...
B-R=1
(R=159 G=149 B=160)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (shrunk to my screen) ...
B-R=3
(R=204 G=193 B=207)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (full size) ...
B-R=3
(R=195 G=184 B=198)
Pale blue indeed. Though the "white" rings provide a slightly red "bias" to the eye, rendering the apparent hue a few notches more bluish. Imagine the paleness of the blue if the colors hadn't been "exaggerated".
---
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from the Voyager 1 picture at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
B-R=9
(R=149 G=179 B=158)
Not quite so pale, but the winner is actually green.
---
For anyone who arrived on this planet recently: R is red, G is green, and B is blue. Although ...
There is a popular belief that the R, G, and B in the call letters of TV station WRGB serving New York's capital distict (Albany, Schenectady, Troy) refer to the colors of color television. Not so, according to ...
Another myth busted.http://www.cbs6albany.com/sections/wrgb/history/ wrote:Our new call letters paid tribute to the late Walter R. G. Baker, a pioneer in television and radio and a GE Vice President involved in setting up the station.
Walter Ransom Gail Baker (1892-1960)
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: In Saturn's shadow (1/11/09)
I think it is mostly artifacts of optical system under high gain.renshaw wrote:The large, diffuse, and dim ones going up and down on the picture? I was wondering about that, too.
Perhaps, the lens got E-Schmutz on it going through the E ring to get good shots of Enceladus.
Art Neuendorffer
- Indigo_Sunrise
- Science Officer
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:40 pm
- Location: Md
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
I actually was one of several winners in an online contest, and received an 18" x 36" poster of the 'sister image' to this. It is gorgeous!!! I have it hanging right above my desk where I can look (read: gaze longingly) at it every day. 8)SittingDownMan wrote:Someone should print this off as a poster....
P.S. You can see the two images here.
Forget the box, just get outside.
- neufer
- Vacationer at Tralfamadore
- Posts: 18805
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
Indigo_Sunrise wrote:I actually was one of several winners in an online contest, and received an 18" x 36" poster of the 'sister image' to this. It is gorgeous!!! I have it hanging right above my desk where I can look (read: gaze longingly) at it every day. 8)SittingDownMan wrote:Someone should print this off as a poster....
P.S. You can see the two images here.
Reddish lens flares
<<The main rings are overexposed in a few places.
Reddish lens flares are visible in both versions of the view.
These radially extending artifacts result from light being scattered within the camera optics.>>
Art Neuendorffer
-
- Commander
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:55 pm
- AKA: Sputnick
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
All I can say is, Like Wow, Man, What a Photo! And I thought (censored for youth's sake) was a trip!
Duty done .. the rain will stop as promised with the rainbow.
"Abandon the Consensus for Individual Thought"
"Abandon the Consensus for Individual Thought"
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
If a similar spacecraft would pull a similar stunt on Earth, would it find rings ( albeit faint ) ???
Wolf Kotenberg
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
I have a question on pale blue dot.. if the camera was on the night side of the Saturn, pointed towards the Sun and the Earth visible in the camera frame.. then practically, the Sun, the Earth and the camera would be on a single line.
Which means that the camera could see only the night side of the pale blue dot (which would not be visible at all, even if its a full moon day).. Comments??
Which means that the camera could see only the night side of the pale blue dot (which would not be visible at all, even if its a full moon day).. Comments??
apodman wrote:Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html ...
B-R=1
(R=159 G=149 B=160)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (shrunk to my screen) ...
B-R=3
(R=204 G=193 B=207)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (full size) ...
B-R=3
(R=195 G=184 B=198)
Pale blue indeed. Though the "white" rings provide a slightly red "bias" to the eye, rendering the apparent hue a few notches more bluish. Imagine the paleness of the blue if the colors hadn't been "exaggerated".
---
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from the Voyager 1 picture at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
B-R=9
(R=149 G=179 B=158)
Not quite so pale, but the winner is actually green.
---
For anyone who arrived on this planet recently: R is red, G is green, and B is blue. Although ...
There is a popular belief that the R, G, and B in the call letters of TV station WRGB serving New York's capital distict (Albany, Schenectady, Troy) refer to the colors of color television. Not so, according to ...
Another myth busted.http://www.cbs6albany.com/sections/wrgb/history/ wrote:Our new call letters paid tribute to the late Walter R. G. Baker, a pioneer in television and radio and a GE Vice President involved in setting up the station.
Walter Ransom Gail Baker (1892-1960)
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
Much like we see Venus from Earth, The Earth will have phases as seen from Saturn. We could see a 1/2 Earth to likely 3/4 full before the suns brightness obscures it. And by using the Saturnian planet to block the sun's direct light, the earth, at 1/2 phase would be extended more than far enough away to be visibledushyant wrote:I have a question on pale blue dot.. if the camera was on the night side of the Saturn, pointed towards the Sun and the Earth visible in the camera frame.. then practically, the Sun, the Earth and the camera would be on a single line.
Which means that the camera could see only the night side of the pale blue dot (which would not be visible at all, even if its a full moon day).. Comments??
apodman wrote:Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090111.html ...
B-R=1
(R=159 G=149 B=160)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (shrunk to my screen) ...
B-R=3
(R=204 G=193 B=207)
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/ ... ni_big.jpg (full size) ...
B-R=3
(R=195 G=184 B=198)
Pale blue indeed. Though the "white" rings provide a slightly red "bias" to the eye, rendering the apparent hue a few notches more bluish. Imagine the paleness of the blue if the colors hadn't been "exaggerated".
---
Brightest pixel: pale blue dot from the Voyager 1 picture at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
B-R=9
(R=149 G=179 B=158)
Not quite so pale, but the winner is actually green.
---
For anyone who arrived on this planet recently: R is red, G is green, and B is blue. Although ...
There is a popular belief that the R, G, and B in the call letters of TV station WRGB serving New York's capital distict (Albany, Schenectady, Troy) refer to the colors of color television. Not so, according to ...
Another myth busted.http://www.cbs6albany.com/sections/wrgb/history/ wrote:Our new call letters paid tribute to the late Walter R. G. Baker, a pioneer in television and radio and a GE Vice President involved in setting up the station.
Walter Ransom Gail Baker (1892-1960)
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
Any planet, anywhere in the universe inside the orbit of the observing planet will show phases.
Wolf Kotenberg
Re: Oooh! Lovely! In Saturn's Shadow (2009 Jan 11)
Outer planets (and their moons) show phases too, but only gibbous and full (more than 50% illuminated). Very far outer planets are almost full all of the time. Of the outer planets, the closest (Mars) shows the widest range. You can find current percent illuminated for all the planets for an observer on Earth in astronomical calendars and almanacs. Only inner planets show crescent phases (less than 50% illuminated).
2009 January 11 APOD
wouldn't earth be much smaller? it has to be on the other side of the sun or else it would be a "new earth" view ... not a full earth as the picture depicts...
- Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18594
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: 2009 January 11 APOD
The image of Earth looks bigger than it actually is, because of diffraction, JPEG artifacts, pixel position uncertainty, and who-knows-what sort of capture process, since the whole image is a mosaic made from images recorded over 12 hours.FeO2E wrote:wouldn't earth be much smaller? it has to be on the other side of the sun or else it would be a "new earth" view ... not a full earth as the picture depicts...
It is impossible at that distance, with that camera, to determine the phase of the Earth (which was actually a bit over 50%). In this image, the Earth subtends an angle of 1.8 arcseconds, and the camera resolution is 12 arcseconds per pixel. So the Earth is completely unresolved.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
https://www.cloudbait.com