Search found 3 matches
- Sat May 21, 2016 3:02 am
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: APOD: 3D Mercury Transit (2016 May 20)
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4495
Re: APOD: 3D Mercury Transit (2016 May 20)
Actually, either is pretty relaxed with practice. The advantage of cross-eyed viewing is that you can cross your eyes a lot, but most people can't get their eyes farther apart than parallel (it's difficult or impossible to go wall-eyed, with your eyes both pointing outward). The consequence of this...
- Fri May 20, 2016 6:25 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: APOD: 3D Mercury Transit (2016 May 20)
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4495
Re: APOD: 3D Mercury Transit (2016 May 20)
Masodo: I never had trouble w the Magic Eyes images. But I can't get the older stereograph images on your blog to superimpose, even w a sheet of paper from my nose down to the division between them on computer screen. It may be a distance thing: on Magic eyes, the distance between images in less th...
- Fri May 20, 2016 4:16 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: APOD: 3D Mercury Transit (2016 May 20)
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4495
Re: APOD: 3D Mercury Transit (2016 May 20)
I have trouble with cross-eyed viewing and edited to add to my collection of parallel viewing images. (should have looked here first) http://blogdogit.com/images/StereoViews/View/Special-007.jpg Parallel viewing is relaxing and can be done for hours on end without the eyestrain associated with cross...