Doh! What's a factor of 1000 among friends. I knew I had something wrong - Yes, it is 220 million.
So the blur would be 1/4000 of the radius.
Search found 59 matches
- Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:29 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: visual distortion of distant galaxies
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5338
- Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:21 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: visual distortion of distant galaxies
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5338
If we are seeing the same star at the edge and in the middle at the same time wouldn't it be a blur? This is not valid, and not because you've missed a coulpe of zeroes. To see anything in two places would require it to move faster than light. EDIT: Oops :oops: :oops: :oops: I am so sorry for accid...
- Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:55 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: Polaris
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4448
The motion of the stars around the Milkyway is a minor dynamic. It will take 100's of thousands of years before nearby stars (like Polaris) change their position noticably.
The precession of the Earth's axis takes only 26,000 years.
See Why is Polaris the North Star?
The precession of the Earth's axis takes only 26,000 years.
See Why is Polaris the North Star?
- Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:39 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: visual distortion of distant galaxies
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5338
- Fri Jul 15, 2005 6:29 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: too many Reflections on the Inner Solar System
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4049
He's refering to Reflections on the Inner Solar System
In it you can see the near horrizon with structures in the reflection but can't see them above. You should see the red sunset in the reflection but don't.
In it you can see the near horrizon with structures in the reflection but can't see them above. You should see the red sunset in the reflection but don't.
- Fri Jul 15, 2005 6:22 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: visual distortion of distant galaxies
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5338
I'm surprised no one has tried to answer this. I would think that the visual distortions would be very noticable. If the 100.000 diameter galaxy rotates every 200.000 years, (our galaxy takes 220.000,) then by the time the light from the outer edge becomes parallel to the front of the galaxy (50.000...
- Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:37 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: Analemma of the moon
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2631
The moon looking bigger on the horizon is an illusion as the pictures show. You can Goggle "moon paradox" for background.
Here's a 25 page explanation The Moon Illusion
Here's a 25 page explanation The Moon Illusion
- Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:54 pm
- Forum: The Bridge: Discuss an Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Topic: Confused by today's APOD description of the moon S. position
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2440
Since no one tried to answer this, I'll take a shot. I'll assume the moon is near the ecliptic as you do. If it is a new moon, thus being on the same side as the sun, then it would also be farthest north. Instead if it's a full moon, opposite the sun, it would be farthest south. Try a drawing: (sun)...
- Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:55 pm
- Forum: Starship Asterisk: Handbook
- Topic: New! APOD software
- Replies: 125
- Views: 273495