by Ann » Fri Aug 14, 2020 7:34 pm
johnnydeep wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:35 pm
APOD Robot wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:05 am
NGC 5189: An Unusually Complex Planetary Nebula
Explanation: Why is this nebula so complex? When a star like our Sun is dying, it will cast off its outer layers, usually into a simple overall shape. Sometimes this shape is a
sphere, sometimes a
double lobe, and sometimes a
ring or a
helix. In the case of planetary nebula
NGC 5189, however, besides an overall "Z" shape (the featured image is flipped horizontally and so appears as an "S"), no such simple structure has emerged. To help find out why, the Earth-orbiting
Hubble Space Telescope has observed
NGC 5189 in great detail.
Previous findings indicated the existence of multiple epochs of material outflow, including a recent one that created a bright but distorted
torus running horizontally
across image center. Hubble results appear consistent with a hypothesis that the
dying star is part of a
binary star system with a
precessing symmetry axis.
NGC 5189 spans about three light years and lies about 3,000 light years away
toward the southern constellation of the Fly (
Musca).
So, I've read Neufer's and Ann's additional text and links, but I'm still not sure if the WR star that is the cause of the NGC 5189 nebula is visible in the photos I've seen (or any others). However, we apparently
do know that this WR star has a binary companion, which means that the existence of both are indeed inferrable, if not actually conveniently visible.
A very good color picture might give the central star away, because it would be so strikingly blue (because it is so hot). Take a look at planetary nebula Abell 43 and its very blue central star to see what I mean.
Then again, the central star of NGC 5189 might not be so blue, since it is a Wolf-Rayet type of central star. I posted a spectrum of a Wolf-Rayet star in a previous post, and if you look at it, you can see that a Wolf-Rayet star has a very bright emission line in the blue part of the spectrum, but it also has two bright emission lines in the green and yellow parts of the spectrum. Therefore, the central star might not give itself away by its blue color in any case.
I agree with you, neither the APOD nor the picture I posted by Robert Gendler helps us pick out the central star of NGC is 5189. But I did find a fine and very true-color-looking picture by Volker Wendel and Bernd Flach-Wilken, which just might give us a clue.
As you can see, one of the stars inside NGC 5189 does look much bluer than any other stars in the picture. So is it the central star? I don't know, because I don't like the fact that it appears to be situated off-center. But it is possible that Volker Wendel and Bernd Flach-Wilken have caught this blue star red-handed.
And if you want a more centrally placed central star for NGC 5189, you might want to check out
this Hubble picture of NGC 5189 which has had a grid mark placed all over it. As you can see, there is a star right at what appears to be the center of the nebula, judging by the grid mark.
Ann
[quote=johnnydeep post_id=305162 time=1597430154 user_id=132061]
[quote="APOD Robot" post_id=305142 time=1597377922 user_id=128559]
[url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap200814.html] [img]https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/calendar/S_200814.jpg[/img] [size=150]NGC 5189: An Unusually Complex Planetary Nebula[/size][/url]
[b] Explanation: [/b] Why is this nebula so complex? When a star like our Sun is dying, it will cast off its outer layers, usually into a simple overall shape. Sometimes this shape is a [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap121008.html]sphere[/url], sometimes a [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap160724.html]double lobe[/url], and sometimes a [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap091115.html]ring[/url] or a [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap030510.html]helix[/url]. In the case of planetary nebula [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_5189]NGC 5189[/url], however, besides an overall "Z" shape (the featured image is flipped horizontally and so appears as an "S"), no such simple structure has emerged. To help find out why, the Earth-orbiting [url=https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/story/index.html]Hubble Space Telescope[/url] has observed [url=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap121219.html]NGC 5189[/url] in great detail. [url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012RMxAA..48..165S/abstract]Previous findings[/url] indicated the existence of multiple epochs of material outflow, including a recent one that created a bright but distorted [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus]torus[/url] running horizontally [url=http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2012/49/image/a/]across image center[/url]. Hubble results appear consistent with a hypothesis that the [url=http://asterisk.apod.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=18008]dying star[/url] is part of a [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecz9GEOE9Wg]binary star[/url] system with a [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession]precessing[/url] symmetry axis. [url=http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2012/49/fastfacts/]NGC 5189[/url] spans about three light years and lies about 3,000 light years away [url=https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/videos/2012/49/726-Video.html]toward[/url] the southern constellation of the Fly ([url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musca]Musca[/url]).
[table][tr][td=left][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/discuss_apod.php?date=200813][b]<< Previous APOD[/b][/url][/td] [td=center][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/view_retro.php?date=0814][b]This Day in APOD[/b][/url][/td] [td=right][url=http://asterisk.apod.com/discuss_apod.php?date=200815][b]Next APOD >>[/b][/url][/td][/tr][/table]
[/quote]
So, I've read Neufer's and Ann's additional text and links, but I'm still not sure if the WR star that is the cause of the NGC 5189 nebula is visible in the photos I've seen (or any others). However, we apparently [b][i]do [/i][/b]know that this WR star has a binary companion, which means that the existence of both are indeed inferrable, if not actually conveniently visible.
[/quote]
[float=right][img3="Planetary nebula Abell 43 and its strikingly blue central star. Photo: Ed Walendowski/Adam Block/NOAO/AURA/NSF."]http://www.caelumobservatory.com/obs/abell43walendowskis.jpg[/img3][/float]A very good color picture might give the central star away, because it would be so strikingly blue (because it is so hot). Take a look at planetary nebula Abell 43 and its very blue central star to see what I mean.
Then again, the central star of NGC 5189 might not be so blue, since it is a Wolf-Rayet type of central star. I posted a spectrum of a Wolf-Rayet star in a previous post, and if you look at it, you can see that a Wolf-Rayet star has a very bright emission line in the blue part of the spectrum, but it also has two bright emission lines in the green and yellow parts of the spectrum. Therefore, the central star might not give itself away by its blue color in any case.
[float=left][img3="NGC 5189 by Volker Wendel and Bernd Flach-Wilken."]https://www.spiegelteam.de/CCD-Aufnahmen/NGC5189.jpg[/img3][/float]
I agree with you, neither the APOD nor the picture I posted by Robert Gendler helps us pick out the central star of NGC is 5189. But I did find a fine and very true-color-looking picture by Volker Wendel and Bernd Flach-Wilken, which just might give us a clue.
As you can see, one of the stars inside NGC 5189 does look much bluer than any other stars in the picture. So is it the central star? I don't know, because I don't like the fact that it appears to be situated off-center. But it is possible that Volker Wendel and Bernd Flach-Wilken have caught this blue star red-handed.
And if you want a more centrally placed central star for NGC 5189, you might want to check out [url=https://previews.123rf.com/images/nasaimages/nasaimages1706/nasaimages170600158/79503884-spiral-planetary-nebula-or-ngc-5189-located-in-the-constellation-musca-1-780-light-years-away-from-e.jpg]this Hubble picture of NGC 5189[/url] which has had a grid mark placed all over it. As you can see, there is a star right at what appears to be the center of the nebula, judging by the grid mark.
Ann