by alter-ego » Tue May 01, 2018 3:24 am
neufer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 30, 2018 4:20 pm
MarkBour wrote: ↑Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:59 pm
Think about Albert Einstein's famous request, what is the star closest to the Sun that anyone photographed during this eclipse, I wonder?
In this image, I see one at about the 8-o'clock position, but it is not very close in.
Due to atmospheric distortion no one has improved all that much on Eddington using
visible light
from the ground (and getting closer to the Sun doesn't help a lot).
Well not so anymore.
Gravitational Starlight Deflection Measurements during the 21 August 2017 Total Solar Eclipse wrote:
Precise starlight positions near the sun were measured during the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse in order to measure their gravitational deflections. The equipment, procedures, and analysis are described in detail. A portable refractor, a CCD camera, and a computerized mount were set up in Wyoming. Detailed calibrations were necessary to improve accuracy and precision. Nighttime measurements taken just before the eclipse provided cubic optical distortion corrections. Calibrations based on star field images 7.4 deg on both sides of the sun taken during totality gave linear and quadratic plate constants. A total of 45 images of the sky surrounding the Sun were acquired during the middle part of totality, with an integrated exposure of 22 seconds.
The deflection analysis depended on accurate star positions from the USNO's UCAC5 star catalog. The final result was a deflection coefficient L = 1.752 arcsec, compared to the theoretical value of L = 1.751 arcsec, with an uncertainty of only 3%.
...
The recent 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse across the United States provided a convenient opportunity to repeat this experiment. This paper reports successful starlight deflection measurements performed in Wyoming using high quality amateur astronomical equipment.
The final results show the most precise and accurate measurements of this kind ever reported.
Done with 100mm aperture (stopped down to 87mm), and 543mm focal length, (comparison images taken within 1 minute before and after totality) these results are 2x better that the best previous measurements made in the 60's and 70's when the best technology provided "large photographic plates (0.2 m to 0.45 m), long refractor telescopes (1.5 m to 8.5 m focal length), and comparison images taken with the same telescope a few months before or after the eclipse to determine non-perturbed star positions."
Nice work by Donald Bruns. The S&T article:
A Picture-Perfect Solar Eclipse Experiment by D. Bruns is informative and an easy read.
[b][/b][quote=neufer post_id=281998 time=1525105214 user_id=124483]
[float=right][img3=""]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XepA3VHXdGY/VaIT-3KEUsI/AAAAAAAAEEU/GFhDM_097BE/s1600/eddington-1919-solar-eclipse.png[/img3][/float][quote=MarkBour post_id=281997 time=1525103967 user_id=141361]
Think about Albert Einstein's famous request, what is the star closest to the Sun that anyone photographed during this eclipse, I wonder?
In this image, I see one at about the 8-o'clock position, but it is not very close in.[/quote]
Due to atmospheric distortion no one has improved all that much on Eddington using [b][u]visible[/u][/b] light [b][u]from the ground[/u][/b] (and getting closer to the Sun doesn't help a lot).
[/quote]
Well not so anymore.
[quote="[url=https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00343]Gravitational Starlight Deflection Measurements during the 21 August 2017 Total Solar Eclipse[/url]"]
Precise starlight positions near the sun were measured during the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse in order to measure their gravitational deflections. The equipment, procedures, and analysis are described in detail. A portable refractor, a CCD camera, and a computerized mount were set up in Wyoming. Detailed calibrations were necessary to improve accuracy and precision. Nighttime measurements taken just before the eclipse provided cubic optical distortion corrections. Calibrations based on star field images 7.4 deg on both sides of the sun taken during totality gave linear and quadratic plate constants. A total of 45 images of the sky surrounding the Sun were acquired during the middle part of totality, with an integrated exposure of 22 seconds. [color=#0000FF]The deflection analysis depended on accurate star positions from the USNO's UCAC5 star catalog. The final result was a deflection coefficient L = 1.752 arcsec, compared to the theoretical value of L = 1.751 arcsec, with an uncertainty of only 3%.[/color]
...
The recent 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse across the United States provided a convenient opportunity to repeat this experiment. This paper reports successful starlight deflection measurements performed in Wyoming using high quality amateur astronomical equipment. [color=#0000FF][b]The final results show the most precise and accurate measurements of this kind ever reported.[/b][/color]
[attachment=0]Deflection Measurements .JPG[/attachment]
[/quote]
Done with 100mm aperture (stopped down to 87mm), and 543mm focal length, (comparison images taken within 1 minute before and after totality) these results are 2x better that the best previous measurements made in the 60's and 70's when the best technology provided "large photographic plates (0.2 m to 0.45 m), long refractor telescopes (1.5 m to 8.5 m focal length), and comparison images taken with the same telescope a few months before or after the eclipse to determine non-perturbed star positions."
Nice work by Donald Bruns. The S&T article: [url=http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/a-picture-perfect-solar-eclipse-experiment/]A Picture-Perfect Solar Eclipse Experiment by D. Bruns[/url] is informative and an easy read.