by The Meal » Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:01 pm
Thanks, Fred. A very nice explanation. I missed the hint in the last link in the caption text, but I concur that it must reference our nearly 2x in 55 day phenomenon.
The moon should move Eastward referenced to the background Gamma Ray sources, but there are conceivable explanations for why the image may be flipped, mirrored, etc. The caption refers to the center of the galaxy to the right side of the image. I'm more familiar with the visible spectrum of the galaxy, and so could not make heads or tails of the Sagittarius constellation in that region, but someone with a better inherent understanding of our gamma-ray sky could probably comment on the correlation between the orientation of the image and our own night sky.
~Neal
Thanks, Fred. A very nice explanation. I missed the hint in the last link in the caption text, but I concur that it must reference our nearly 2x in 55 day phenomenon.
The moon should move Eastward referenced to the background Gamma Ray sources, but there are conceivable explanations for why the image may be flipped, mirrored, etc. The caption refers to the center of the galaxy to the right side of the image. I'm more familiar with the visible spectrum of the galaxy, and so could not make heads or tails of the Sagittarius constellation in that region, but someone with a better inherent understanding of our gamma-ray sky could probably comment on the correlation between the orientation of the image and our own night sky.
~Neal