by neufer » Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:28 pm
buzdavis wrote:This is a pretty image, but not the number of triplets (like Orion's belt). Is this usual ?
Sharpless 171 star births were all natural and didn't involve any fertility drugs.
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap081018.html
[quote="buzdavis"]This is a pretty image, but not the number of triplets (like Orion's belt). Is this usual ?[/quote]
Sharpless 171 star births were all natural and didn't involve any fertility drugs.
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap081018.html